User talk:LivingBot/ProjectSignup

Anti-media?
Why include good articles while excluding featured pictures and featured sounds? Durova Charge! 22:12, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Those were just suggestions, but I've added yours to the list as well. - Jarry1250 (t, c) 22:16, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Harry Potter signup
I think this is a great idea, but is the WP Harry Potter a good candidate?? We have only 4 FA and a dozen GA. Nonetheless, I hope the WP HP can be part of this. -- LoЯd  ۞pεth  04:51, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * If anything, it is an ideal candidate for its low number of members - exactly the sort of news that would not otherwise get any coverage. Feel free to add it. - Jarry1250 (t, c) 08:56, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Featured/Good topics (again...)
I made a mistake, sorry. Before I said number of articles in FTs = this category, number of articles in GTs = this category. But in fact, number of articles in FTs = this category + this category - 8, number of articles in GTs = this category + this category - 2. Also number of GTs = this category - 1. Sorry for the confusion on my part! rst20xx (talk) 15:17, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Why the minuses? - Jarry1250 (t, c) 17:02, 7 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Within the -8:
 * there is -7 because there are 7 articles in both the Top and High categories, i.e. 7 articles that are the main article of one featured topic and also a member of another. Unfortunately this number might change from time to time, I'll have to keep you posted.
 * There is -1 because the 555 count at Category:High-importance Featured topics articles is 1 too high. This can be seen because the pages of the category purportedly contain 200, 200 and 154 articles. This problem is due to a glitch in the MetaWiki software that occasionally happens to categories with over 200 pages in them. Again, I'll have to keep you posted.

-- rst20xx (talk) 18:02, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The -1 is because of Template:ArticleHistory/testcases (so this won't change)
 * The -2 is because of Template:ArticleHistory/testcases twice (so this won't change either)
 * Just trying to understand :) Well, looking at the sheet, I've got the number of featured topics as Top importance. Is that wrong now then? - Jarry1250 (t, c) 18:59, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
 * No that one's right! 86. Sorry, it's a very confusing system and I completely failed to explain it properly before. I realised my mistake last week when the fact that there were now over 300 articles in good topics failed to show up - rst20xx (talk) 19:39, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Maintained?
Is this still being maintained? I've seen new notices come up, but there's an apparently unprocessed requested from May 2009... 76.66.203.138 (talk) 06:22, 6 November 2010 (UTC)