User talk:Livisoccer26

August 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Allison Taylor has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Tommy! [ message ] 00:14, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

December 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Pope John Paul II, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Pope John Paul II was changed by Livisoccer26 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.916283 on 2010-12-03T15:17:46+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:18, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

January 2011
The article Rueger family has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, individual animal, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 18:43, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

October 2011
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Protestantism, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Protestantism was changed by Livisoccer26 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.886639 on 2011-10-17T23:18:24+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:18, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Clogging. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Clogging was changed by Livisoccer26 (u) (t) ANN scored at 1 on 2011-10-17T23:25:14+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:25, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Clogging with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 23:33, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Renaissance art, you will be blocked from editing without further notice. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Renaissance art was changed by Livisoccer26 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.963091 on 2011-10-18T12:33:31+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:33, 18 October 2011 (UTC)