User talk:LixNew2

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kollab (May 22)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kollab and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Kollab Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DoubleGrazing&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Kollab reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:11, 22 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Hello,
 * The things I said in the article are true. The problem is that our software is not known, so there are no other external sources apart from the software's website. And how do you expect me to support a software. This is just a presentation of the software and its history, so why do you need proof? I'm the creator of this software LixNew2 (talk) 14:16, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Okay, a few things...
 * Everything needs to be verifiable from reliable sources. Whether something is 'true' or not doesn't matter, if it cannot be proven to be so.
 * In any case, we are not interested in what you have to say about your software, but what independent secondary sources (newspapers, magazines, TV and radio programmes, etc.) have said about it, entirely on their own initiative. This is the definition of notability in the Wikipedia context, and is a core requirement for inclusion here. If such sources don't exist, then it won't be possible to have an article on this subject accepted into Wikipedia.
 * Given that you are writing about your own product, you have a conflict of interest (COI), which must be disclosed. You need to either make the general COI disclosure, or the more specific paid-editing one (I recommend the latter). I will post two more messages here with instructions.
 * You also must not try to use Wikipedia to promote your software, which is what you're now doing. Promotion of any sort is forbidden, and can lead to your user account being blocked.
 * HTH, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:27, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
 * I'm not promoting my software, just talking about what it's got, like visual studio code, godot, etc.
 * ... LixNew2 (talk) 14:34, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Furthermore, I don't see why you denigrate my work by making me appear as someone who is just looking for self-promotion or worse: Draft:Kollab, gives the impression that you have a financial interest, no. disclosed in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory disclosure requirements for paid editing.
 * It’s unacceptable to hear such things! LixNew2 (talk) 14:37, 22 May 2024 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Kollab has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Kollab. Thanks! DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:13, 22 May 2024 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, LixNew2. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the edit COI template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see );
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see );
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:28, 22 May 2024 (UTC)

May 2024
Hello LixNew2. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Kollab, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:LixNew2. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:29, 22 May 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Kollab


A tag has been placed on Draft:Kollab, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:40, 22 May 2024 (UTC)