User talk:LizardLover36

Hi there!
It's me LisaGiocondo! Just checking in, as I can see on our Art and Law Dashboard you may be a bit behind with the Wikipedia editing this term. If so, I'd encourage you to come to the upcoming Edit-a-thons and especially the seminar next week. This will give you a better idea of how to plan and strategize going forward so you have plenty to discuss in your Report.

Our Dashboard has lots of suggestions for how to get started with some really useful training. You can find more guidance and ideas on our Wikipedia ExeArtLaw2021 project page.

Some other pages that you might find helpful include:


 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article
 * Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Good luck with your editing and I hope you enjoy being a Wikipedian! LisaGiocondo (talk) 14:38, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

April 2021
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Boris Johnson, you may be blocked from editing. ''You've removed the same paragraph from this article three times so far without good reason (or any reason at all). Take your rationale to the talk page and seek consensus before attempting to remove it again. Thanks'' DSQ (talk) 09:10, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

Hiya! I'm actually quite new to this so thank you for the warning! The removal of the paragraph was actually discussed on the talk page with consensus from two users who agreed the para didn't add value to the article. Thus, I presumed that was enough to constitute as grounds for removal. Do let me know how the process normally works on Wiki if otherwise because this isn't my area of expertise. Once again, thank you for reaching out! <3 LizardLover36 (talk) 09:41, 29 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Yikes - on reflection I was a bit bitey there and I apologise for that. You can trout me if you like - I don't mind. Are you referring to the section "final sentence of intro"? If so, that doesn't really equate to consensus for the removal of the entire paragraph of long-standing information. Maybe you could start a new discussion on the talk page around the removal of the whole section if you think that's appropriate? Just be mindful that repeated reverts of the same info may be seen as edit warring and try to avoid that. Also, try to remember to include an edit summary with every edit - I have a reminder set up as I'm prone to forget. Maybe that'd be helpful for you too. You can set that up via your user preferences. Hope I've not put you off and I'll now go away and practice being more welcoming  --DSQ  (talk) 10:51, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

Yeah, on reflection, I realized that none of my edits made any sense out of context eeeek! Will def keep all your advice in mind though, thank you so much for reaching out! <3 LizardLover36 (talk) 16:14, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

u r the.lizerd