User talk:Lizo4kapriz

Deletion discussion about Benefits of philosophy is not proven, and it is possible harm
Hello, Lizo4kapriz,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Benefits of philosophy is not proven, and it is possible harm should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Benefits of philosophy is not proven, and it is possible harm.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Barney the barney barney (talk) 19:57, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Benefits of philosophy is not proven and it is possible harmful
Hello,, and thank you for your contributions!

I wanted to let you know it seems an article you worked on, Benefits of philosophy is not proven and it is possible harmful, is copied from another Wikipedia page, Benefits of philosophy is not proven, and it is possible harm. It's fine to do this as long as you provide the following information in the edit summary:


 * 1) a link to the article you copied from
 * 2) the date you copied it

You can do this now by editing the page, making any minor edit to the article, and adding the above information into the edit summary.

If you're still not sure how to fix the problem, please leave a message at the help desk. It's possible that I made a mistake, so feel free to remove the tag I placed on the article.

Thanks again for helping build the free encyclopedia! MadmanBot (talk) 21:04, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Benefits of philosophy is not proven, and it is possible harm
Hello Lizo4kapriz,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Benefits of philosophy is not proven, and it is possible harm for deletion in response to your request.

If you didn't intend to make such a request and don't want the article to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Barney the barney barney (talk) 21:09, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Benefits of philosophy is not proven and it is possible harmful
Hello, Lizo4kapriz,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Benefits of philosophy is not proven and it is possible harmful should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Benefits of philosophy is not proven and it is possible harmful.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Barney the barney barney (talk) 21:11, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Removing afd templates
Don't do this, it's disruptive, and doesn't remove the deletion discussion which will be re-added by a bot. If you continue to do this I will ask for enforcement. Barney the barney barney (talk) 21:30, 24 December 2013 (UTC)