User talk:Lizqk

Welcome!
Hello, LizOnehub, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I notice that one of the first articles you edited was Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Onehub, which appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or any other editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One firm rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! SarahStierch (talk) 17:52, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
 * The plain and simple conflict of interest guide
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [ Articles for creation help desk], or on the [ . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 19:03, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

June 2013
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 19:03, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Onehub (December 14)
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [ Articles for creation help desk], or on the [ . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Drmies (talk) 01:38, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

The OneHub article
The problem is not so much that you are the employee of the company but that at the time being the article does not satisfy our notability criteria. May I please ask you to read two of our policies: Notability (choose specifically companies) and use of reliable sources. If you do not understand something there please ask just here, at your talk page. After you are done with the reading, you will be understanding better what is asked from you, and you can decide whether you want to abandon the article or to continue editing in the good direction.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:07, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

== Thank you Ymblanter! Yes, I did read both policies in detail and still do not understand how our article does not satisfy the notability criteria. We have a reliable source that showcases how we are unique. We want to continue editing, and we want to meet the Wikipedia standard and policies. I just need help with the editing because each time I change our article and resubmit it it gets rejected, and I am unsure as to why…Hoping that Sarah can help me. She offered to help….

LizOnehub (talk) 18:14, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
 * First, I am not sure how reliable this source is, given that on the main page the only thing they are talking about is commercialization. Compare with New York Times, for instance, which is a reliable source. Moreover, even if it were a reliable source, one source is not sufficient, we usually require at least three sources undoubtful reability. Third, this source confirms at best 10% of what is in the article.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:49, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

== Thanks again Ymblanter. I would have to disagree with you that our source is not reliable. In our space of IT, it is very well respected. This seems like an opinion? To your third point, you are correct, this source is only supporting the second sentence in our article. All other sentences are supported by other sources (all reputable, for example, Amazon and xconomy.com). However, if it is the second sentence that is in question, here are 2 other reliable sources talking about our Onehub product for Dropbox business users: http://www.fiercecontentmanagement.com/story/onehub-offers-more-sophisticated-security-dropbox-business/2013-11-12 http://unified-communications.tmcnet.com/topics/unified-communications/articles/360050-onehub-integrates-with-dropbox-enabling-secure-file-sharing.htm

Thanks for your help on this.

LizOnehub (talk) 22:24, 8 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Hi Liz. A couple of points: While articles submitted at  WP:Articles for Creation may  be declined or accepted by  any  reviewer who  is an experienced Wikipedia editor  in  good standing, it  is interesting  to  note  that  it  has been declined by  several  admins who  were on  review patrol  at  the time of your (re)sumbmissions. I  am  not  sure that  the sources you  cite above, blog  contributions  by  freelance editors Ron  MillerI and Shamilla Janakiraman are acceptable -  please see WP:Reliable sources especially  the sub section   at  WP:USERG; our WP:reliable Sources Noticeboard will  be able to  provide you  with more information. In  its current  cast, and having  reviewed the sources myself and those above, if it  were to  be published to  Wikipedia mainspace I  do  not  believe however, that  it  would be kept  if  sent  for review by  the community at  at  Articles for deletion.


 * Secondly, what my  admin  colleague  has not  yet  pointed out  but  which  needs mentioning now is your clear WP:Conflict of interest. This becomes evident from  your choice of user name and the frequent  use of the  'we'  pronoun. These are possible infringements of policy  that  could lead to  your account  being  blocked from editing  the encyclopedia. Please take a moment  to  read our WP:Username  policy, in  particular the sub sections at  WP:CORPNAME and WP:ISU. Regards, Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 00:49, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Onehub concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Onehub, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Onehub


Hello Lizqk. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Onehub".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 15:45, 12 October 2014 (UTC)