User talk:Lizstless

Welcome
Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  Michaelas10   (Talk)   15:49, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style

McSweeney's issue guide
On the McSweeney's Talk page you asked about a guide to the quarterly's issues. Please check out the article Timothy McSweeney's Quarterly Concern -- ShelfSkewed [Talk] 04:29, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

Oh right - on the quarterly concern page, not the mcsweeney's page duh. Thanks! Lizstless 04:35, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Web analytics question
Hello Lizstless,

Just a note that I replied to your question on Talk:Web analytics. Stephen Turner (Talk) 10:03, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

Nomination of Napier Collyns for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Napier Collyns is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Napier Collyns until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rathfelder (talk) 19:33, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of The Barbarian Group for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Barbarian Group is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/The Barbarian Group until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.  HighKing++ 13:33, 27 June 2024 (UTC)