User talk:Lizzie656

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dr. Sharon Weiss-Greenberg (August 17)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gbawden was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dr. Sharon Weiss-Greenberg and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Dr._Sharon_Weiss-Greenberg Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Gbawden&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Dr._Sharon_Weiss-Greenberg reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gbawden (talk) 06:27, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Pam Scheininger
Hello Lizzie656,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Pam Scheininger for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Kavdiamanju (talk) 18:02, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sarah Hofstetter


A tag has been placed on Sarah Hofstetter requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Pichpich (talk) 19:46, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Bat Sheva Marcus


A tag has been placed on Bat Sheva Marcus, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Seraphimblade Talk to me 20:32, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

Promotional editing
I'm not sure what you're going on here, and you may mean well, but the "articles" you've been writing are heavily promotional. This is not acceptable. First, articles must be neutral in tone and content. Yours have not been, in part due to the use of pull quotes to finish up sentences. Summarize, and do it neutrally, don't use quotes like that. Also, don't use long, fluffy pull quotes that don't add appreciably to the informational content of the article. In addition, I note a lot of peacock terms, especially things like "leader" and the like. We don't have any need to fill up articles with adjective overload like that. If they do lead something, just neutrally describe what it is (e.g., "was Chair of the Board for Example Group from 2005 to 2010"). Finally, the articles are written in the style of a CV rather than a biography. I strongly suggest you write any future articles first as a draft, to allow more experienced editors to review them for issues like this. However, even drafts are subject to deletion if they are blatantly promotional. That must be toned down. Some of these might actually be appropriate article subjects, but we do not allow promotion of anyone or anything, including hagiographies. Seraphimblade Talk to me 20:37, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

I will take you advice on submitting as drafts and on trying to write in an overall more neutral tone---However, I don't know how many times I have to stress this, I am not writing anything on Wikipedia for Promotional reasons. I don't know if you've heard of Wikipedia's WikiProject Women in Red, a project whose goal is to add notable women to Wikipedia since there is a huge lacking of women on the site. I am an Orthodox Jewish Women I'm also a Jewish Feminist. I did not decide to add a profile on myself (which would be promotional) but rather am adding profiles of other Orthodox Jewish Women and Jewish Feminists, who are notable and deserve recognition. The only thing I'm promoting is equality. The only thing I'm trying to do is add more profiles of women. It is very clear to me why this movement even exists in the first place, because no matter what any woman did she is not considered notable.
 * I rather believe you that you're not just intending to spam. If I thought that was your only intent, I probably wouldn't bother trying to help, I block several spammers on most days. But it has nothing to do with women or anything else, or even with notability. It's entirely possible that some of the people you're writing about actually would pass notability standards. G11 deletion only has to do with an article being promotional, and would apply even if the subject were unequivocally notable. Seraphimblade Talk to me 21:43, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marcel Lindenbaum (August 23)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Marcel Lindenbaum and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Marcel_Lindenbaum Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:SwisterTwister&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Marcel_Lindenbaum reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister  talk  05:01, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Lawrence Krule


The article Lawrence Krule has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Fails WP:NBIO

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. shoy (reactions) 20:19, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Rabbanit Rachel Levmore
I moved the page from Draft:Dr. Rabbanit Rachel Levmore to Draft:Rabbanit Rachel Levmore as wp:naming conventions preclude the use of "Dr." and such from titles. Also, the use of "Dr." in articles should be avoided per wp:credential. After the first use of the full name, use only the surname per wp:Surname Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 17:31, 24 August 2016 (UTC) Did not know that, thank you so much!! Lizzie656 (talk) 18:40, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

Welcome!


Hello, Lizzie656, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The Wikipedia Adventure (a fun interactive editing tutorial that takes about an hour)
 * Wikipedia Teahouse (a user-friendly help forum)
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, or you can  to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! We are so glad you are here! Jim1138 (talk) 19:41, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

You also may find there are some specific rules in the Manual of Style, in particular, that apply to certain situations. Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages (but not article edits) by typing four tildes (~) ; this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions or ask your question on this page and then place Help me before the question. I hope this is not too late to help you and that you will not be discouraged when you learn more about Wikipedia.
 * Introduction to Wikipedia; and Contributing to Wikipedia; and Wikipedia tutorial; and Getting started
 * Avoiding common mistakes; and How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * Simplified ruleset; and Simplified Manual of Style; and Manual of Style
 * List of policies; and List of guidelines
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia; and What Wikipedia is not; and Words to watch and Manual of Style/Words to watch
 * Identifying reliable sources; and Verifiability; and No original research; and Neutral point of view
 * How to copy-edit; and How to create your first article
 * Help:Referencing for beginners; and Help:Footnotes
 * Help:Introduction to talk pages; and Help:Using talk pages; and Talk page guidelines
 * Copyright Problems; and Copyright violations; and Images; and Image use policy
 * Help:Contents and Questions provide guidance and links to pages where help can be requested. Also see Teahouse.

Welcome! Jim1138 (talk) 19:41, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

Blocked
Well, this is unfortunate, because I think you mean well. However, when I told you that you may not write promotional material, I meant it. You've continued to do that, and I've just gotten done deleting some more of it. Since the warning didn't seem to work, I've blocked your account from editing.

You may appeal the block by using the steps at the guide to appealing blocks. Alternatively, I would be willing to unblock you if you will agree to the following two conditions: You may only create new articles as a draft and must have them approved by articles for creation before moving them to mainspace, and you must stop using quotes in articles, since you are in the habit of using them to make the article promotional. While not specific unblock conditions, you'd also need to stop throwing things in like "prestigious" to describe an award. Stick to dry, plain facts, don't throw in peacock adjectives. And don't write articles on people as a CV. They should be a biography, not a resume. If you'd be willing to agree to those two conditions, please respond here (you can edit your own talk page even while blocked, and I've got it on watch and will see it). Seraphimblade Talk to me 18:19, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

Upcoming editathons: Women in Nursing & Women Labor Activists
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 16:44, 27 August 2016 (UTC) via MassMessage

Invitation to 	 Women in Architecture & Women in Archaeology editathons
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 20:05, 24 September 2016 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rabbanit Rachel Levmore (September 27)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ntb613 was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rabbanit Rachel Levmore and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Rabbanit_Rachel_Levmore Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ntb613&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Rabbanit_Rachel_Levmore reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ntb613 (talk) 00:23, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

An invitation to November's events
(To subscribe: Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 18:07, 23 October 2016 (UTC) via MassMessaging

December 2016 at Women in Red
(To subscribe: Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 22:43, 23 November 2016 (UTC) via MassMessaging

January 2017 at Women in Red
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 02:13, 29 December 2016 (UTC) via MassMessaging

February 2017 at Women in Red
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 20:55, 28 January 2017 (UTC) via MassMessaging

September 2017 at Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 21:19, 28 August 2017 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red October editathon invitation
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:54, 25 September 2017 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Draft:Marcel Lindenbaum concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Marcel Lindenbaum, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Marcel Lindenbaum concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Marcel Lindenbaum, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Marcel Lindenbaum


Hello, Lizzie656. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Marcel Lindenbaum".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. » Shadowowl  &#124;  talk  18:06, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Avi Finegold for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Avi Finegold is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Avi Finegold until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kyuko (talk) 17:08, 15 September 2020 (UTC)