User talk:Lizzielulu78

Copyright issue with Lumacurve Airfield Signs}}}
Hello. Concerning your contribution, :, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from. As a copyright violation, : appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. : has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:. If the article or image has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at :, after describing the release on the talk page. However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Angus McLellan (Talk) 18:03, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Airfield-SMALL.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Airfield-SMALL.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 18:05, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

I work for the company
How can I become authorized to put our companies information onto Wiki? I work for this company and would like to have our information up there.

Thanks, Liz


 * Hello Liz! Unfortunately there's no simple answer to your question. It's strongly discouraged that people should submit articles to Wikipedia where they have a potential conflict of interest. Equally, Wikipedia has a strong anti-advertising policy, rather unkindly the page in question is Spam, but the intent is broader than "spam". Articles on companies or groups need to meet the relevant guideline. This means that they need to be written from a neutral point of view, and that they have to be verifiable. Verifiable doesn't mean "true", it means "a reliable source somewhere said the same thing". You can find a checklist of the kind of organisations and companies that would be a shoe-in, generally, here. While we have articles on things that don't fit, that's either (a) because they are special cases somehow, or (b) we haven't got round to cleaning up. My advice to you would be "don't". I know that isn't very helpful, but the alternatives aren't so great. If someone offers to write an article on Wikipedia in return for payment, give them a wide berth. Very best wishes, Angus McLellan (Talk) 15:37, 6 February 2007 (UTC)