User talk:Lizzygabbie

Creating a talk page for our first assignment
 * Is this how you're supposed to leave messages on other people's talk pages? 798wilkinson (talk) 17:06, 28 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Hey! Just leaving a message for the first assignment! Lind6710 (talk) 19:44, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Sources that I will be using for the improvements on the article I will be working on...

Lindberg, David. The Beginnings of Western Science. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 2007.

Don, Allen. University of Leeds, "The Origins of Greek Mathematics." Last modified January 31, 1997. Accessed February 16, 2014. http://www.math.tamu.edu/~don.allen/history/greekorg/greekorg.html.

Violatti, Cristian. Ancient History Encyclopedia, "Greek Mathematics." Last modified September 24, 2013. Accessed February 16, 2014. http://www.ancient.eu.com/article/606/.

Dr. John Stewart,. February 14, 2014. Dr. John Stewart, (Professor of History of Science at the University of Oklahoma), interview by Andrew Zerby, Significance of Isaac Newton and Albert Einstein in Early Mathematics February 14, 2014. Lizzygabbie (talk) 18:37, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 19 February
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:45, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
 * On the De Motu Antiquorum page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=596225006 your edit] caused a URL error (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F596225006%7CDe Motu Antiquorum%5D%5D Ask for help])

Peer Review for Hippocratic Oath
Very well written and structured. Tells what it is about, what it was for, and why they needed it. The article describes it as a binding oath to keep its practitioners in moral check. I didn't notice any grammatical errors, there may have been some small changes that are needed but I didn't notice them. The article did pose a couple of questions that I feel other readers may have as well. 1) What would be the consequences if someone broke the oath in a time where it was deemed extremely important to uphold? 2) If a recent graduate in the early 20th century would not swear by the oath due to their spiritual beliefs, would they still be permitted to practice? That's all I have on the review, other than that it was very well done. 798wilkinson (talk) 00:25, 31 March 2014 (UTC)