User talk:Lizzymckenzie/sandbox

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relationships_and_health This article has a lot of room for improvement. While it discusses much relevant information, it does not link any page for one to understand what is being addressed. This could cause readers to become confused with the information being discussed in later sections, or even within that section. The author is also stating his own belief on relationships, but providing relevant sources in order to back his argument up. It is also hard to follow at certain points due to a wide variety of different research that has been done with in- text citations. If there was more links to specific things he is talking about, I think the article would improve greatly. I also believe that if the author broke into down into more sections, it would help readers because he discusses many different concepts in a variety of ways. However, this topic is not one that has been looked at in this specific way with all of the direct links the author gives, so it provides new content and a new perspective. The references linked are fairly recent, although they range from 1976-2018. The links do work, however some articles are currently unavailable.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBTQ_psychology This article provides useful information, as well as provides links for different words and ideas that they discuss in the article. There are some sections in the article that provide dense, useful information. However, other parts are lacking detail or a deeper understanding of the idea that she is describing. I think there could also be a lot added to this article because the topic is so vague, and there are many different facts and theories to be talked about. The content is relatively easy to follow, and talks about LGBT+ in psychology; LGBT+ research and individuals not being heavily represented or talked about in society, or textbooks. Many of the sources are from before 2010, but there are several current sources. I think this article is a good start, but needs work in terms of more current sources, different sections, and more detail.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impulsivity This is a very well written, well-informed article. It goes into great detail about many parts of impulsivity. It ranges from eating, attention, and substance abuse. This article dives deeply into different aspects in psychology and how impulsivity relates to each of these things. It is clear to understand and has links to different ideas that they talk about. There are over 100 sources, thus resulting in a wide range of current, and less current, research and ideas that have been discussed. This article could use more detail in certain parts, but overall it is a very good article.

Lizzymckenzie (talk) 00:48, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

BIBLOGRAPHY: Choy, Y., Fyer, A. J., & Lipsitz, J. D. (2007). Treatment of specific phobia in adults. Clinical psychology review, 27(3), 266-286. Dwivedi, S., & Kumar, R. (2015). Efficacy of cognitive drill therapy in agoraphobia with panic disorder: A case study. SIS Journal of Projective Psychology and Mental Health, 22(2), 150-157. Tsao, J. C., Mystkowski, J. L., Zucker, B. G., & Craske, M. G. (2005). Impact of cognitive-behavioral therapy for panic disorder on comorbidity: a controlled investigation. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 43(7), 959-970. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lizzymckenzie (talk • contribs) 02:11, 8 October 2020 (UTC)