User talk:Ljohn210

Section blanking on Article Sig MCX
Thank you for joining the Wikipedia mission! I noticed you removed several pieces of information from the article SIG MCX. While the decisions to include both the description of the Sig MCX as an “assault rifle” and the portion on its usage in the Orlando nightclub shooting were both controversial, their inclusion was decided by a sourced consensus. Your deletions have been reverted. Please use the talk page to discuss the matter before removing the information. Thank you! ~ Pbritti (talk) 19:39, 16 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Cause anything to marxist mfs is an assault rifle. Hell your pen should be and assault pen for assaulting freedom Ljohn210 (talk) 12:33, 1 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Hi! Saw your message and just wanted to respond and explain that civility in responding to this sort of issue is far more beneficial than aggression. In any case, as discussed on the Talk page for the MCX, the rifle is produced and sold both commercially and to government agencies in multiple configurations. At least one of these configurations fulfills the accepted standards for “assault rifle,” as it is a rifle chambered in an intermediate round, is designed for use with detachable magazines, and is select-fire (it possessing a pistol-grip further emphasizes its classification in certain configurations as such). Whatever positions “Marxist” might have on the issue is irrelevant, though a great many Marxists in 1940s Tula, USSR would probably take offense to your questioning their understanding of firearm classification. Have a wonderful rest of your year and reach out if you want help with any further edits! ~ Pbritti (talk) 01:04, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

January 2021
Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 12:29, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Only reason you undid them is cause they was true and went against your marxist democrat agenda Ljohn210 (talk) 12:31, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. CLCStudent (talk) 16:52, 1 January 2021 (UTC)