User talk:Ljs90

A page you started (Jan Vanriet) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Jan Vanriet, Ljs90!

Wikipedia editor Salimfadhley just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Interesting article about an interesting subject. You should add categories to your article so that people can find it more easily."

To reply, leave a comment on Salimfadhley's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Notability
Upon second consideration and review of sources I have withdrew the tag, the subject seems notable. To help, I'd recommend you read WP:ARTIST and post on Talk:Jan Vanriet an short paragraph on which sources / awards / etc. seem to help the article fulfill the requirements listed there. Thank you for your contribution, --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 07:00, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

Copyright problem: Jan Vanriet
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Jan Vanriet, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://janvanrietcom.webhosting.be/en/biography/ http://janvanrietcom.webhosting.be/en/biography/2/, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Jan Vanriet and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Jan Vanriet, in your email. See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Jan Vanriet. See Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the material is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Jan Vanriet with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at [ this temporary page]. Leave a note at Talk:Jan Vanriet saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 22:41, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

October 2020
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Edward Hopper, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.  freshacconci  (✉) 14:28, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

I have replied to this on your talk page. The source I provided is reliable, from a peer-reviewed art historical journal The Burlington Magazine. This is verified new research correcting older information and should be included in the main wiki text.

Edward Hopper
You removed a source, adding a new unverified source and are engaging in an editing dispute. You are required to discuss this suggested change on the article talk page without reverting further.  freshacconci  (✉) 14:30, 1 October 2020 (UTC) I have done so, on the article talk page.