User talk:Lkovach5/sandbox

Article Selection
Is the article's content relevant to the topic? The content is relevant to public criminology. Since the topic is still relatively new there isn't as much information available to write about compared to say criminology as a whole.

Is it written neutrally? I wouldn't necessarily say neutrally. Although the first 2 paragraphs argue both sides of PC, I still felt like the authors were more biased towards arguing the acceptance of it. Further on in the article I felt again like only the "pros" were really talked about.

Does each claim have a citation? From what I can tell, yes. The references part at the bottom seems accurate.

Are the citations reliable? All the citations but #9 are reliable. I don't doubt the validity of #9 but the dates need to be verified.