User talk:Llahgob

Welcome
Hello, Llahgob, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and have been reverted. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on. Again, welcome! tedder (talk) 15:25, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Tedder: If in your position of administrative authority, you won't take a few seconds even to look something up ON WIKIPEDIA, what's the point in anyone trying to be helpful? There are many published sources; it's an element of the story that's mentioned repeatedly elsewhere, *including on Wikipedia*. No-one to my knowledge disputes the facts. You could have reminded me to add sources to a non-contentious factual addition, to *add to* the usefulness of Wikipedia; instead you're using your power to demolish by over-zealous application of procedural niceties. It's against the Wikipedian ethos as I understand it. Working against a thoughtless and unconstructive modus operandi like that, I can't be bothered to fix it.

Your submission at Articles for creation
Gamu Nhengu, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. Thank you for helping Wikipedia!  Kraftlos  (Talk | Contrib) 04:50, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see what needs to be done to bring it to the next level.
 * Please continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request.
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider

Nomination of Gamu Nhengu for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article Gamu Nhengu, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Gamu Nhengu until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. T. Canens (talk) 06:22, 7 October 2010 (UTC)