User talk:Llamadog903

If I have left you a message, I'd prefer you respond here than on your talk page.

Are you bored? Please stop ammending our accurate Blackbeard entry on Wikipedia. Chris McCleary is a data pirate and well known as black beard. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Datamonkey (talk • contribs) 15:56, 2 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Apologies if my message is impatient, I was just exasperated. Ive just discussed with our lecturer who pointed out that there were 2 potential men known as black beard, and the one on wiki is indeed as arguably legitimate as Chris McCleary. I will amend the entry to reflect this, and get to the uni library this afternoon to confirm the citation references. Thanks

Hey: I just corrected a welcome message you left. When you use you should write  and don't forget the ~ at the end. Thanks for welcoming people, though! Mangojuice 01:43, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

Hey - no problem. You're still forgetting to sign the welcome message by adding ~ at the end, though. Thanks again! Mangojuice 01:52, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

PLEASE STOP
Hey -- I just realized you're welcoming dozens of users that don't actually exist. Why are you doing this? Adding nonsense to wikipedia is considered WP:Vandalism. And just in case you think this will help your RFA, it won't: people are too savvy about wikipedia to fall for it. If you want to help, I'd ask you to mark all those fake user talk pages with so that someone can clean up this mess. Mangojuice 02:03, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

Sorry, I was mistaken. Most of the users you welcomed hadn't contributed any articles, but they had been created. I apologize, I should have been more careful. Mangojuice 02:19, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

A Few Questions
When a "controversy" exists on a "discussion page", and a consensus is reached regarding that "controvesy", is it polite, for one person, who did not take part in the controversy to change (or in this instance: remove) a portion that he felt "controversial". Without even going to the "discussion" page first and re-opening the "controversy"? That is: if this happened to you, how would you feel? Mark Preston 17:14, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

UPA
KnowledgeOfSelf 12:40, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

Userboxes
Okay, here's what you do. Go to the Userboxes page. Scroll down to the bottom, and Voila! There's a bunch of codes for making userboxes! Copy one you like. Then, start a new article called Template:Name of userbox. Obviously, fill in a name. Then, paste what you've just copied. Its kind of self explanatory from there. If you have more questions, just ask!JaredW! 12:07, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

Which ID section are you asking about? The first one, where you insert pictures or very short text, or the long one, where you write the long text? JaredW! 12:00, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

Trading spaces
Hello, Llamadog903, thank you for signing up to participate in Esperanza's trading spaces program. As you requsted to have your user page renovated by another user, Smurrayinchester will be renovating your userpage. Please contact Smurrayinchester on their talk page about the renovating. The renovating will be listed at Esperanza/Programs, please feel free to update the status as it changes. Enjoy!


 * Sorry for not replying sooner. What would you like done with your page? Smurrayinchester 13:55, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

Old Skool Esperanzial note
Since this isn't the result of an AC meeting, I have decided to go Old Skool. This note is to remind you that the elections are taking place now and will end at 23:50 UTC on 2006-04-29. Please vote here. Thanks. --Cel es tianpower háblame 20:42, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

Happy Birthday
Primat e #101  01:16, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Hey, did you know there's no article for January 22, 2006 in Wikipedia?

I had to change my template to accomodate!-- Primat e #101  01:21, 5 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Happy birthday, and may many more be with you. RyanG e rbil10 02:05, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

A short Esperanzial update
As you may have gathered, discussions have been raging for about a week on the Esperanza talk page as to the future direction of Esperanza. Some of these are still ongoing and warrant more input (such as the idea to scrap the members list altogether). However, some decisions have been made and the charter has hence been amended. See what happened. Basically, the whole leadership has had a reshuffle, so please review the new, improved charter.

As a result, we are electing 4 people this month. They will replace JoanneB and Pschemp and form a new tranche A, serving until December. Elections will begin on 2006-07-02 and last until 2006-07-09. If you wish to run for a Council position, add your name to the list before 2006-07-02. For more details, see Esperanza/June 2006 elections.

Thanks and kind, Esperanzial regards, &mdash;Cel es tianpower háblame 16:00, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

WP:CVU status
The Counter-Vandalism Unit project is under consideration to be moved to and/or  status. Another proposal is to delete or redirect the project. You have been identified as a project member and your input as to this matter would be welcomed at WT:CVU and at the deletion debate. Thank you! Delivered on behalf of xaosflux 16:49, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Satanismsymbol.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Satanismsymbol.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 19:11, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

NO
ok Zlesliez (talk) 15:56, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for the revert :) —  Xy7  (talk)   22:11, 10 January 2008

Redlinks
Sure. Or you can go ahead and create a page, if it's notable enough.  bibliomaniac 1  5  22:45, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Web broker
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Web broker, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of Web broker. Redfarmer (talk) 12:18, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

January 2008
Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made: You may already know about them, but you might find Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit was inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. -- Menti  fisto  17:43, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes, it's perfectly acceptable in fact. The aim is to stop the vandal from vandalizing and anyone can do that - then, if they continue, and after a last warning, you can report them to WP:AIV. -- Menti  fisto  21:01, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

Stuff
julian look at this: from: zlesliez

Happy birthday fellow Wikipedian!
'Chubb 'enna itor  08:11, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Idontknow 610 TM 19:36, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Adam den Haene
Hi, I don't think that the above article is a speedy. I think the fact he has won some awards and is referneced in secondary sources asserts some notability. Maybe you should try prod? thanks --Bit Lordy (talk) 21:53, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

Thank You so Much
It was really kind of you to put a speedy deletion tag on David Zolotarev. I would much rather spend my time thanking you for this than actually helping make wikipedia more inclusive when it comers to dealing with prominent Russian professors of anthropology who were murdered by the Stalin. People like you make it such a lovely experience working on wikipedia, and I would be grateful if you would check ''ALL' the pages I have ever edited in case there are any other pages that should also be subject to speedy deletion.Harrypotter (talk) 21:57, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

Names for dab pages
See Disambiguation - there's no need for a disambiguation page to have "(disambiguation)" in the title unless there IS a need because there's an identified "primary usage". PamD (talk) 23:18, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

CSD Tagging
Hi, and thanks for your help tagging CSDs in Special:Newpages. You recently tagged YouTube Fred as A1 (short article). Be careful when applying A1. In this case, the article should have been tagged as A7 because it was non-notable web content. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me here or on my talk page. Other than that, please keep up the good work. :-) --cremepuff222 (talk) 01:03, 27 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Replied to your question on my talk. --cremepuff222 (talk) 01:32, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

Hello!
Please try to use my newpage tool if you want: add this line to your monobook.js: then do a hard refresh by pressing CTRL+SHIFT+F5 then it should say: new pages on the right. The update is each second. -- Crea m y! Talk 01:39, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

Thanks
I had a cut-and-paste set up for these road name redirects and I totally forgot the brackets. Thanks for the heads up, I'll go fix them. Credo From  Start    talk  13:55, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

Careful, please
Please note the circumstances surrounding your speedy deletion nomination of Filll/RfA review. Please be a little more careful with twinkle. Thanks and mahalo! --Ali'i 14:37, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

Image tags
Please see my reply on my talk page. At least one of the images you tagged as not having a license was clearly intended to be uploaded with the PD-self template, even if the uploader used the wrong template. Removing image copyright violations is important, but improperly tagging self-taken photos as copyright violations discourages new users. &mdash; Arthur Rubin (talk) 14:10, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

db-nouser
In this edit you requested speedy deletion of a user talk page on the grounds that the user did not exist. However, the user clearly did exist, since he had been vandalizing, and has been blocked for that. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 16:02, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

Trustnet
Hi, I am new to Wiki, and attempting to upload some information about a fund performance rating system but it keeps getting reported for speedy deletion, because it contains references to the company from which these ratings are issued.

I am contesting this deletion because references to the company in question (Trustnet) are made to support the article I am writing about Crown Ratings - the fund rating which this company uses to rate the performance of mutual funds in various markets.

This is a quantitative rating based on recognised performance ratios, unbiased, independent of any fund provider, and freely available to all, making it relevant to anyone who invests in mutual funds in the markets where these ratings apply, and the rating - as well as the rating provider - are no less worthy of mention than, for example, other ratings agencies featured on Wikipedia such as Standard & Poor's, so I'm a little confused.

Can you help me understand what I need to do to ensure that the ratings appear on Wiki, without compromising the purpose of the encyclopedia?

For info - this is what I am trying to draw attention to - http://www.trustnet.com/general/ratings.asp

Please stop tagging CSD tags until you review what they mean.
Hi, I noticed you tagged two articles with db-nocontext here and here. The first one is supposed to be a db-band as a non-notable band. However the second one is really not "no-context" since it did mention that the person is an actor in an internally linked British show article. Please review WP:CSD before tagging additional articles. Thanks and have a great day! And if you have questions, feel free to ask.  - Jameson L. Tai   talk ♦  contribs  13:34, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

Scotland
Hello :) I Only added the saint andrews cross information title as england, northern ireland and wales has it, why shouldn't scotland --89.240.251.201 (talk) 22:34, 12 July 2008 (UTC)--89.240.251.201 (talk) 22:34, 12 July 2008 (UTC)


 * ...because the addition of these sub-headings has been done-to-death on the talk page, and seems to be the modus operandi of a particularly strange sock-army.
 * Llamadog903, I've reverted your good faith reversion and the anon's edit - no discredit to yourself, as you were acting entirely in good faith.
 * Cheers, This flag once was red   22:47, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

Why
Howcome u want the Cibola Caounty Beacon article deleted?Dominic Edward Aragon (talk) 22:32, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to WikiProject Carnivorous plants!
Hi there! I see we suffer from the same affliction: an obsession with carnivorous plants. Glad to have you aboard. Just a heads up, as you can probably tell from the project talk page, we're not all that active. Many of the main members are busy in real-life and can't make big contributions. That being said, you've probably seen User:Mgiganteus1 around on the Nepenthes articles and I'm finishing off the final few stubs of Utricularia, though I specialize in Stylidium. User:NoahElhardt, when he's around, spends a lot of time on Pinguicula. Anything you specialize in? Right now, as a project, we lack basic stubs for many species, but we are also in need of a few more featured articles. Let me know if anything grabs your attention that you might like to collaborate on. I'm always up for a change of pace from my stub creation. I've also got access to plenty of resources (primary journals), so if you ever come across something you need and can't get, let me know and I'll see what I can do.

Anyway, enough blathering for now. Again, welcome! Cheers, Rkitko (talk) 02:28, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

Plasters
Hello, changed your csd template on this page to a re-direct to Adhesive bandage, which is where Plaster re-directs to, and removed the notification from the editor's talk page - just thought I would let you know! Not sure it would have passed a csd anyway (assuming a page on plasters somehow didn't already exist) as there was sufficient context and the subject is certainly notable, even if the page did not do it justice. Anyway that's beside the point. Have a good day :) A v nj a y Talk 15:35, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

CarnivorousPlants-stub
Hi - a stub template or category which you created has been nominated for deletion or renaming at Stub types for deletion. The stub type, which was not proposed at WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals, does not meet the standard requirements for a stub type, either through being incorrectly named, ambiguously scoped, or through failure to meet standards relating to the current stub hierarchy or likely size, as explained at Stub. Please feel free to make any comments at WP:SFD regarding this stub type, and in future, please consider proposing new stub types first! Grutness...wha?  00:55, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Your RfA was unsuccessful
I am sorry to inform you that I have withdrawn your RfA as it unfortunately no longer had a realistic prospect of being successful. I hope you will not be too disheartened as many of Wikipedia's best admins had unsuccessful early attempts. I hope you will take on board the comments made and will consider running again when you have more experience. WjBscribe 01:21, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

ACC Tool
Hi, I just need to confirm that you requested access to the ACC tool. I need to confirm your identity before approval for security reasons. Alexfusco5 02:18, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
 * You have been approved, please read WP:ACC/G for more information on the tool. There is an IRC feed of requests available in #wikipedia-en-accounts on freenode Alex<b style="color:red;">fusco</b><sup style="color:green;">5 02:21, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I can't find the info for this anywhere else. If a username is taken or such and I hit Taken, does it send them an E-mail? If it does not do I send them one from my personal E-mail account?
 * Yes, it sends them an Email. <b style="color:blue;">Alex</b><b style="color:red;">fusco</b><sup style="color:green;">5  17:36, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Unblock

 * I have suspended your access on the ACC tool. If this block is reversed your access can be restored. <b style="color:blue;">Alex</b><b style="color:red;">fusco</b><sup style="color:green;">5 19:08, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
 * It is looking like multiple established accounts were inexplicably blocked by User:Slakr for "block evasion" with no further reason. My inclination is to support an immediate unblock. --Elonka 19:35, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
 * This account is apparently a Grawp sock per Slakr's message on my talk <b style="color:blue;">Alex</b><b style="color:red;">fusco</b><sup style="color:green;">5 19:43, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Slakr is not a CheckUser. What proof is being used to justify this accusation? --Elonka 19:59, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I have no idea who Grawp even is. The Llama! (talk) 21:27, 24 July 2008 (UTC)


 * I have posted details about the investigation at User talk:Slakr. If you have any other trouble, please let me know ASAP.  And again, profuse apologies for the confusion here. --Elonka 21:33, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I have reversed your suspension on the ACC tool as this was a clear mistake, sorry. <b style="color:blue;">Alex</b><b style="color:red;">fusco</b><sup style="color:green;">5 21:37, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Now, THAT is annoying! It still says I cannot edit for another day. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Llamadog903 (talk • contribs) 21:42, July 24, 2008
 * Is it all cleared now? Or are you still getting autoblock messages? --Elonka 22:01, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Echoing the sentiments of my fellow admins, above - my apologies for the block. I feel especially bad, given my decline of your unblock request, above. Again, mea culpa! Best to you, UltraExactZZ Claims~ Evidence 22:44, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
 * BTW, Llamadog903, if/when you go up for admin again, please contact me, and I'll be happy to answer any questions that may come up about the block, to ensure that it doesn't hinder your chances in any way. I am also available for some adminship mentoring... Perhaps not a fulltime "official" mentor, but I can definitely answer any questions that you may have, or review certain situations that you are dealing with. My own area of expertise right now, is analyzing dispute resolutions procedures, especially in cases dealing with articles that are in longterm chronic edit wars.  For example, you might be interested in reading this, a page that I helped to write: New admin school/Dealing with disputes. --Elonka 16:21, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Mark Alvin Jabrica
You tagged Mark Alvin Jabrica for speedy delete as nonsense. I have removed the tag because the article is not nonsense, just not English. You may want to remove the notice from the user's page. Thanks. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 16:54, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

Not necessarily
Removing warnings, and the rest of the talk page, prevents the appeals process from working. Eventually, if the block has been upheld or is a ban, then in due course the page will be removed by a bot as the page is no longer needed. –– Lid(Talk) 12:49, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Obsolete link
Please change in this archive (I'm blocked from this operation): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Greek_alphabet/archive_1#A_different_opinion_worth_noting.3F following non-working link: "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Adamic_language/archive0" into http://www.wikinfo.org/index.php/Adamic_language that works, because new link is closest equivalent to old link, thanks. Orlowski pokemaster (talk) 10:32, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

Banned user
Please delete this talk (I'm blocked from this operation): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Wikinger It belongs to user that is banned indefinitely, and contains only bot messages, thus is unneeded at all. Orlowski pokemaster (talk) 10:39, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Please refer to Suspected sock puppets/Wikinger (2nd nomination) regarding the message above Mayalld (talk) 13:55, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

Googol
Please change in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Googol (I'm blocked from this operation): "10( 10 100 ) " into "$$10^{10^{100}}\,\!$$" to avoid bad rendering of this power tower. Orlowski pokemaster (talk) 10:52, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

thanks for speedy deletion!
that was fast! thanks for picking up that one - got the wikilinking on the archive wrong. was just about to find an admin to request deletion... cheers! Onesecondglance (talk) 10:57, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

Your rollback request
Hi! I regret that I must inform you that your request for the rollback permission has been denied. You can discover why by checking the archives at Requests for permissions/Denied/October 2008. SoxBot X (talk) 01:30, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

ECourier
Hi, I am trying to re-write this article to make it up to standards. See discussion here. If I haven't quite gotten it right, please give me some pointers. Thanks very much for your time.Travisb4279 (talk) 10:33, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

Redirects to categories
When creating a redirect to a category, please put a colon at the beginning of the link (before the word Category). For example, please use #redirect Category:Requests for unblock, not #redirect. This way, the redirect doesn't end up being one of the entries in the category. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 11:19, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

Template:User:bench
Hi Llamadog903. I initially thought this template was created by User:Bench. Is there a need to have Template:User:bench in template namespace? If not, please consider moving it to one of your user subpage and consider changing the name to something that does not imply ownership by another user. Thanks. -- Suntag  <font color="#FF8C00">☼  19:21, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

Typo redirect Template:UBX/madscientist
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Template:UBX/madscientist, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Template:UBX/madscientist is a redirect page resulting from an implausible typo (CSD R3). To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Template:UBX/madscientist, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 19:50, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

Template:User:CSD
Hi Llamadog903. I moved "Template:User:CSD" (which had two namespaces in the title) to "User:UBX/User CSD" (Which has several User:UBX/User templates). -- Suntag  <font color="#FF8C00">☼  22:08, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I moved "Template:User:Digestion" to "User:UBX/Digestion". -- Suntag  <font color="#FF8C00">☼  22:21, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

Smolt (Linux) speed deletion
The reason for my comment here is that you declared my first contribution (stub) Smolt (Linux) as candidate for speedy deletion, and whole process was so fast that when I've found your message there was no deletion marker anymore. Amazing. I'll keep for a while few links about first steps on Wikipedia that you provided. Simon321 (talk) 20:16, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

John Burgess (bagpiper)
You might consider reading articles before nominating them for speedy deletion. If an article says someone was "one of the most eminent players of the Scots bagpipes" and provides a reference to back it up, it's hard to see how you can suggest that it "does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject". Just a thought.Quelcrime (talk) 13:30, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

sorry
I accidentally reverted one of your edits here. I have my browser text magnified several times which made the link to the IP's contributions prior to yours vertically below the rollback button ... which I mistakenly hit ... sorry! THEN WHO WAS PHONE? (talk) 14:07, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

TfD nomination of Template:User:bench
Template:User:bench has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. B (talk) 04:56, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

Vandalism of Exhibitionism
Hey! I'm out doing RC Patrol right now, too, and I wanted to ask you about a reversion that you made. It was |this one. I see that you marked it as vandalism and left the level 1 vandalism warning on the user's talk page, but I had also looked at that particular edit and was thinking that it was probably a good faith edit -- they were saying that flashing also referred to exposing of a man's genitals, which I feel was a reasonable contribution. I hope you don't find my questioning offensive, I was just wondering why you found that to be vandalism? FaerieInGrey (talk) 04:19, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Talkback
Cssiitcic (talk) 21:20, 18 February 2009 (UTC) stop deleting my pages, please.

Thank You Soulja Boy
I have removed your db-band tag on Thank You Soulja Boy because that only applies to bands or singers themselves, not songs. Feel free to prod the article though. FingersOn  Roids  23:14, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Fizy
The page you suggested for deletion is not an advertisement. I have no affiliation with fizy.com The page is intended to be informative. If you find it biased you should try to improve it instead of deletion. --Nevit (talk) 20:30, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 02:32, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Bob the ghost
You tagged Bob the ghost under A1, which means that there is no context. However, upon reading the article, it simply describes a run-of-the-mill gym teacher, which is deletable under A7, the correct tag. Happy editing, --Patar knight - chat/contributions 00:49, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

VANDALISM
I was trying to revert vandalism on World Extreme Cagefighting and you reverted my edit back to the vandalised edition. Currently, WEC does not have a Flyweight division, but will have one in the near future, so the current infobox is incorrect and misleading. Thank you very much. 24.91.180.246 (talk) 18:10, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Tell me about it. This guy is a fukn asshol. As soon as you create an article he tries to get it deleted. If you hate Wikipedia that much why not log out and get a life? You'll never get the whole of Wikipedia deleted, Llamapig.
 * Yeah he really sucks. He deleted some crappy article!!!!  The Llama! (talk) 01:11, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

Warning
... Tim Song II (talk) 02:21, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Duh - I assume that it was a mistake? Tim Song (talk) 03:13, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

Please mark yourself out of 10 for this edit
Hi! Philip Trueman (talk) 12:51, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

Vandalism to Saint Patrick
If you did not make this edit you might want to check that your account is secure. Richard Keatinge (talk) 15:51, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

Membership of the Counter-Vandalism Unit
As you may know, the Counter-Vandalism unit is inactive. So for reviving the WikiProject, we will need to sort out the members. So if you are active, please put your username at the bottom of the list at Wikipedia talk:Counter-Vandalism Unit.

You are receiving this message as a current member of the CVU.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Counter-Vandalism Unit at 00:35, 30 October 2011 (UTC).

Requests for unblock listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Requests for unblock. Since you had some involvement with the Requests for unblock redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). John Vandenberg (chat) 06:55, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Quixotic plea
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Wikipediholism test. Thanks. —  06:37, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)