User talk:Llappala

Scottevest
Hi, thanks for your edits to Scottevest - unfortunately, I have had to revert them. Let me explain. You may not be aware that there has been a lot of controversy and contention over the Scottevest article in the past. (see Talk:Scottevest for a summary.) This means that EVERY edit made to it needs to be closely scrutinised and made sure that it is as rock solid and reliably supported as possible. As so much of the article is already cited to reliable published sources, any added information must be supported by new citations that also pass WP:RELIABLESOURCE. I know your edits are obviously in good faith, but there is history to the article which means that new edits and updates must be REALLY solid and leave no room for challenge. Also, some of the language of the edits sounded a bit promotional and press-releasey, which would give Scottevest's detractors an excuse to try and get the article deleted or discredited all over again. Sorry again for reverting your edits, but I trust that you understand why. Mabalu (talk) 00:17, 13 May 2016 (UTC)