User talk:Llaudable Llama

Nomination of Michael F. Rehill for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michael F. Rehill is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Michael F. Rehill until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kleuske (talk) 12:13, 21 May 2019 (UTC)

May 2019
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to move pages to bad titles contrary to naming conventions or consensus, as you did at Michael F. Rehill, you may be blocked from editing. —— SerialNumber  54129  17:59, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi Llaudable Llama. User:Serial Number 54129 is correct that your page move was disruptive but I don’t think you were being deliberately so. From your “delete” edit summary it looks like you realized that the second version of the page was redundant because User:SoWhy had responded to your request to recreate the first version of the article at Draft:Michael F. Rehill. However, moving the page to a nonsense title was not the way to do it. In the future you can tag the page for speedy deletion under the criteria “author requests deletion” and an admin will get rid of it for you if no-one else has substantially edited the page. Pawnkingthree (talk) 22:39, 21 May 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Pope John XXIII Middle School


Hello, Llaudable Llama. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Pope John XXIII Middle School".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 18:34, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Michael F. Rehill


Hello, Llaudable Llama. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Michael F. Rehill".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 14:12, 22 November 2019 (UTC)