User talk:Llightex/Archive 1

September 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Vespers Rising, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Vespers Rising was changed by Llightex (u) (t) blanking the page on 2010-09-27T21:42:59+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 21:43, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

October 2010
Your additions to Vespers Rising and Fossil fuel have been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. VernoWhitney (talk) 20:57, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

December 2011
Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Template:Babel/sandbox worked, and it has been reverted or removed. However, if you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 01:32, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Working People's Party/meta/shortname


A tag has been placed on Template:Working People's Party/meta/shortname requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is an unused duplicate of another template, or a hard-coded instance of another template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is not actually the same as the other template noted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page explaining how this one is different so as to avoid any future mistakes ( ).

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page, where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Llightex (talk) 22:45, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Benjamin F. Conley, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Republican (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

July 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=618089961 your edit] to Geoffrey R. Pyatt may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:39, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Nuland#Leaked phone conversation|a diplomatic scandal]] in January 2014, when his conversation with the Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs at the United States

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=619254552 your edit] to Dhanush may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:46, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
 * ]'', a romantic entertainer laced with action and directed by cinematography-turned-director [Velraj]. It released to positive reviews from critics and audience alike, and was a box office hit.

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=619277399 your edit] to Legalism (Chinese philosophy) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:04, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
 * http://www.indiana.edu/~p374/Legalism.pdf}|website=Indiana University|publisher=Indiana University}  {{cite web|last1=Pines|first1=Yuri|title=Submerged by Absolute Power: The Ruler’s

Disambiguation link notification for August 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Diary of a Wimpy Kid: Dog Days (book), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jeff Kinney. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

August 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=621284611 your edit] to Haider Al-Abadi may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:45, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Al-Abadi asserted that there was no illicit dealing in the completed awards. cite web|title=US probe fails to stop mobile licence awards|url=http://www.telegeography.com/

Disambiguation link notification for August 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hoodoo (folk magic), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Voodoo. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

Fields Medal page
Hello there,I'm that user who's been the victim of editing the Fields Medal page(i.e.I got blocked with charge of Vandalism.).I've got three question:1)When the current protected status of that page ends,Does the page current contents remain in place or they are replaced with the old version? 2)I've prepared a new and somehow comprehensive table about Fields medalists.I posted this table on the discussion section of the Fields Medal page,and I request for comments about this(If You come there and see my that table I will be really glad,and don't forget to put your comment about it down there!;-)),but so far,just one person did so.Is it normal? 3)Should I submit a request for edit to replace the new table with current one?Or should I wait for reaching a consensus?Thank You. Rezameyqani (talk) 07:50, 19 August 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rezameyqani (talk • contribs)

Toontown Online Private Servers
Hi there,

According to Wikipedia's Video Game Editing Guidelines, "Remakes" should have their own article rather than being added onto the original game's page.

Here is a statement taken from Wikipedia's Video Game Editing Guidelines:

"If you can verify enough information to write a non-stub section about the distinct reception of a video game remake, as well as a non-stub section about its distinct game development or design, then the remake will qualify for its own article."

Therefore, Private Servers need to remain off Toontown Online.

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Starsky135 (talk • contribs)

Hey,

First of all, Toontown Rewritten did not have its own section at all, only 1-2 sentences that mentioned its existence. There is not enough information to write an entire section. Also, the guidelines quote:

"If there is not enough distinct information on the remake for a complete article, the few distinct aspects of the remake should be covered in the original game's article."

Toontown Rewritten is not notable enough for its own article; look at the Deletion log, and, especially, the recent nomination for deletion. There, you will see that a separate article for TTR lacks notability, and meets the criteria for having a small mention in the Toontown Online article as per Wikipedia's Video Game Guidelines.

Note that I am not advocating an entire section for TTR, nor for any other private servers (which would be a mess). TTR is the most popular remake, and it has an authentic source, too. Llightex (talk) 23:14, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Peloponnesian League, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hellenic League. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia from the Anatomy Wikiproject!
Welcome to Wikipedia from WikiProject Anatomy! We're a group of editors who strive to improve the quality of anatomy articles here on Wikipedia. One of our members has noticed that you are involved in editing anatomy articles; it's great to have a new interested editor on board. In your wiki-voyages, a few things that may be relevant to editing wikipedia articles are:
 * Thanks for coming aboard! We always appreciate a new editor. Feel free to leave us a message at any time on the WikiProject Anatomy talk page. If you are interested in joining the project yourself, there is a participant list where you can sign up. Please leave a message on the talk page if you have any problems, suggestions, would like review of an article, need suggestions for articles to edit, or would like some collaboration when editing!
 * You will make a big difference to the quality of information by adding reliable sources. Sourcing anatomy articles is essential and makes a big difference to the quality of articles. And, while you're at it, why not use a book to source information, which can source multiple articles at once!
 * We try and use a standard way of arranging the content in each article. That layout is here. These headings let us have a standard way of presenting the information in anatomical articles, indicate what information may have been forgotten, and save angst when trying to decide how to organise an article. That said, this might not suit every article. If in doubt, be bold!
 * Lastly, why not try and strive to create a good article! Anatomical articles are often small in scope, have available sources, and only a limited amount of research available that is readily presentable!

Feel free to contact us on the WikiProject Anatomy talk page if you have any problems, or wish to join us. I wish you all the best on your wiki-voyages! --Tom (LT) (talk) 23:31, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

September 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=625292209 your edit] to AiScaler may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:35, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
 * company WBS. The project was called "Jxel", short for Java Accelerator. The technology was Java-based and intended to be run on a Java Virtual Machine sharing the

Disambiguation link notification for September 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Internet bot, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bandwidth. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Ormskirk School
My eyes are having a problem, causing the innocent edit to be reverted, so I accidentally pressed the revert button.  Eye snore  (pc) 22:33, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited PIN proteins, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page PGP. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:04, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:23, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Your contributed article, A Fragment on Government


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, A Fragment on Government. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Jeremy_Bentham. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Jeremy_Bentham – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Pam D  23:02, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Status and Advice

 * As reviewing administrator, I redirected the article to Jeremy_Bentham   because it says very little that isn't in that section. If you want to work on the article further, and I would advise you to do it because it has the potential for a full article, add to the existing section information about the critical reception of the work at the time, and subsequently--both Bentham's view of this own early work, and the views or later writers, especially recent ones. I think there's a n enormous literature on Bentham.  Then boldly move it back, with a link. If you have any difficulty about it, let me know on my user talk page nd I will help you.  DGG ( talk ) 15:48, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from CLAW hypothesis into The Revenge of Gaia. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 23:53, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lycus, son of Poseidon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Antiope. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Argument from reason, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Naturalism. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rebecca, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Laban. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:12, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

What level are you?
I found your name at Category:User js (probably because you posted the corresponding userbox on your user page), in the level-unspecified list of JavaScript programmers.

I was wondering how experienced you are at JavaScript, and whether you might be interested in getting involved with developing user scripts, hobnobbing with other JavaScript programmers, and organizing and improving JavaScript articles and support pages.

We do all of that and more at the JavaScript WikiProject.

Scripts undergoing development, and the state of JavaScript on Wikipedia, are discussed on the talk page.

For an overview of JavaScript coverage on Wikipedia, see Draft:Outline of JavaScript and Index of JavaScript-related articles. For everything on user scripts, see User:The Transhumanist/Outline of scripts.

The WikiProject also organizes every resource it can find about JavaScript out there, such as articles, books, tutorials, etc. See our growing Reference library. If you know of any good ones, please add them.

If you would like to join the JavaScript WikiProject, feel free to add your name to the participants list.

Hope to see you there! The Transhumanist 16:51, 12 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Yeah sure, I would love to help out! I've had a decent amount of experience with Javascript, but there's a lot of stuff to be done right now on the wikiproject. Let me know if there are any specific projects that need attention. Llightex (talk) 01:17, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

Reversion of my edit to the Hyde Amendment page
Since it happened less than a minute after I made the edit, I'm assuming it was automated.

Either way, I think my edit was completely justified, because the text I deleted was basically just name-calling. It was akin to appending something like "Hillary Clinton (also known as Shillary the Corrupt Hag[45])" or "Donald Trump (also known as Drumpf or 'that orange asshole'[11]) to a random mention of the name of a famous politician.

I don't doubt that there are many pro-choicers who refer to the pro-life side as the "anti-choice movement", just like I'm sure there are plenty of pro-lifers who refer to the pro-choice side as the "pro-death movement". However, including that kind of name-calling on the main pages for each movement would be a stretch, and adding it to a random mention of the name on a page about a 1976 law seems ridiculous.

I don't intend to go on a WP:POINT spree, but if you still think my deletion of that sentence was unfounded, I would like to know if you think that that kind of "also known by its opponents as" info should be added to every mention of every political and social movement on every page. If not, what makes this instance different? 194.54.31.80 (talk) 15:05, 15 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Yes, that makes sense. I'd have to admit, I didn't really think about what the edit was for and just thought an anonymous IP deleted some references. Sorry! Llightex (talk) 15:13, 15 May 2017 (UTC)


 * No problem. Happy we could reach an agreement. 194.54.31.80 (talk) 15:17, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

WikiProject
You're obviously interested in windmills. There is a dedicated WikiProject covering mills in general - WP:MILLS. Just add your name to the members list and you're in! Mjroots (talk) 16:22, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Refs
Please do not remove these from medical articles. We reference every sentence generally. Thanks. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 19:27, 17 May 2017 (UTC)


 * , thanks for letting me know. Where can I find general policies for medical articles such as this one? Llightex (talk) 22:00, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
 * WP:MEDRS and WP:MEDMOS are good places to start. Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 00:13, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Welcome to WikiProject JavaScript
Thank you for joining up!

If you haven't already, please add WikiProject JavaScript to your watchlist, so you can spot activity on the WikiProject's talk page.

(By the way, there's a new message there now, about jsfiddle). The Transhumanist 21:49, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Please check lead section at JavaScript
I heavily revised it. If you have time, please check it for accuracy and flow. Thank you. The Transhumanist 20:33, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

I made a new script!
And it actually works as intended.

It is called StripSearch.

Its instruction manual (for users) and a code walk-through (for programmers) are included at User talk:The Transhumanist/StripSearch.js.

Any and all comments would be appreciated. The Transhumanist 09:21, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Happiness, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Atman ([//toolserver.org/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Happiness check to confirm] | [//toolserver.org/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Happiness?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

Request for feedback on some JavaScript programming...
Hi Llightex,

The last time I contacted you, you replied:


 * Yeah sure, I would love to help out! I've had a decent amount of experience with Javascript, but there's a lot of stuff to be done right now on the wikiproject. Let me know if there are any specific projects that need attention. Llightex (talk) 01:17, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

I've been working on scripts to view and to develop outlines (a type of list article). Would you mind looking under the hood? They are far from perfect, so if you notice anything that could be improved (such as my approach, programming style, ideas for cool new features, or even new scripts), I'd be very interested in your feedback. To make it easier for other programmers to follow along with what each script does, I've made extensive notes explaining the source code on their talk page.

So far, there is:
 * User:The Transhumanist/OutlineViewAnnotationToggler.js – this one provides a menu item to turn annotations on/off, so you can view lists bare when you want to (without annotations). When done, it will work on (the embedded lists of) all pages, not just outlines. Currently it is limited to outlines only, for development and testing purposes. It supports hotkey activation/deactivation of annotations, but that feature currently lacks an accurate viewport location reset for retaining the location on screen that the user was looking at. The program also needs an indicator that tells the user it is still on. Otherwise, you might wonder why a bare list has annotations in edit mode, when you go in to add some. :) Though it is functional as is. Check it out. After installing it, look at Outline of cell biology, and press . And again.
 * User:The Transhumanist/RedlinksRemover.js – strips out entries in outlines that are nothing but a redlink. It removes them right out of the tree structure. But only end nodes (i.e., not parent nodes, which we need to keep). It delinks redlinks that have non-redlink offspring, or that have or are embedded in an annotation. It does not yet recognize entries that lack a bullet (it treats those as embedded).

It is my objective to build a set of scripts that fully automate the process of creating outlines. This end goal is a long way off (AI-complete?). In the meantime, I hope to increase productivity as much as I can. Fifty percent automation would double an editor's productivity. I think I could reach 80% automation (a five-fold increase in productivity) within a couple years.

There's more:
 * User:The Transhumanist/StripSearchInWikicode.js – another script, which strips search results down to a bare list of links, and inserts wikilink formatting for ease of insertion of those links into lists. This is useful for gathering links for outlines. I'd like this script to sort its results. So, if you know how, or know someone who knows how, please let me know. A more immediate problem is that the output is interlaced with CR/LFs. I can't figure out how to get rid of them. Stripping them out in WikEd via regex is a tedious extra step. It would be nice to track them down and remove them with the script.

I look forward to your comments, questions, ideas, and suggestions. The Transhumanist 08:16, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

P.S.: Please ping me so I don't miss your reply. Thanks. -TT

JavaScript WikiProject update
There's a new user script: SearchSuite.js

It enhances search results.

Please take a look at it and let me know how it can be improved.

Thanks. &mdash; The Transhumanist     10:18, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

JavaScript programmers needed at WT:WPPORT
The portal system is being overhauled.

They could really use some input from JS programmers on what is possible. &mdash; The Transhumanist  22:43, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

" Better called Islamist terrorism"
Regarding your comment on Islamic terrorism:

Terrorism is not Islamic ,because unjust violence is not Jihad and not Islamic in principle...It is a politicized distortion of Islamic teachings, like Crusades to Christianity, and modern Zionism to Judaism --Haywi (talk) 12:00, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

Ways to improve Facebook content oversight board
Hello, Llightex,

Thank you for creating Facebook content oversight board.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

"Please expand to include more sources not published by Facebook. I did a quick search and found that there are many available from the past two months."

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

ComplexRational (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Poverty Knowledge concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Poverty Knowledge, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:29, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Poverty Knowledge


Hello, Llightex. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Poverty Knowledge".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 09:04, 23 June 2020 (UTC)

Join the RfC to define trust levels for WikiLoop DoubleCheck
Hi , you are receiving this message because you are an active user of WikiLoop DoubleCheck. We are currently holding a Request for Comments to define trust levels for users of this tool. If you can spare a few minutes, please consider leaving your feedback on the RfC page. Thank you in advance for sharing your thoughts. Your opinion matters greatly! María Cruz

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:59, 22 August 2020 (UTC) If you would like to modify your subscription to these messages you can do so here.

Missing cite in Mary Emmons
The article cites " Oppenheimer 2015" but no such source is listed in bibliography. Can you please add? Also, suggest installing a script to highlight such errors in the future. All you need to do is copy and paste importScript('User:Svick/HarvErrors.js'); // Backlink: User:Svick/HarvErrors.js to your common.js page. Thanks, Renata (talk) 01:22, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

New, simpler RfC to define trust levels for WikiLoop DoubleCheck
HI , I'm writing to let you know we have simplified the RfC on trust levels for the tool WikiLoop DoubleCheck. Please join and share your thoughts about this feature! We made this change after hearing users' comments on the first RfC being too complicated. I hope that you can participate this time around, giving your feedback on this new feature for WikiLoop DoubleCheck users. Thanks and see you around online, María Cruz MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:05, 19 November 2020 (UTC) If you would like to update your settings to change the wiki where you receive these messages, please do so here.

Your draft article, Draft:Poverty Knowledge


Hello, Llightex. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Poverty Knowledge".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 20:40, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

are u gonna ignore what i said?
^^ Mywikiaccount28 (talk) 20:20, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

Hey Mywikiaccount28, if you look at my edit message (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Llightex&oldid=997272929), and my message on your talk page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Mywikiaccount28#Hawley_article), I did not ignore what you said. I started a discussion earlier on the "Josh Hawley" talk page: see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Josh_Hawley#%22Conspiracy_theorist%22, and let'd discuss there further! In the future, please check your own talk page for incoming messages 🙂 Llightex (talk) 20:25, 30 December 2020 (UTC)