User talk:LloydStarkiller

Welcome!
Hello, LloydStarkiller, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:


 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! JarrahTree 10:38, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

January 2019
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Australian Labor Party, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 00:48, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Australian Labor Party. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 15:04, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Australian Labor Party
Can I please make edits to the Australian Labor Party page by adding its ideologies because every other page for Australian political parties has their ideologies included. LloydStarkiller (talk) 07:19, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
 * There is concensus to not add them. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 11:04, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

Why?


 * I dont know, i did not parttake in the discussion, but unless anybody can convince a majority of editors to change their opinion on the matter, concensus must be upheld! Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 23:16, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

That’s lame I wish I could change them I mean it’s not that hard to work out the parties ideologies and political position. I don’t know why the editors made this discussion.

July 2019
Your recent editing history at 2013 Australian federal election ‎ shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.''The wording you are using this account and an IP account to edit war in is clunky. Please discuss on the talk page.'' Nick-D (talk) 05:55, 7 July 2019 (UTC)


 * As you are continuing to edit war and have not started any discussions, I've started a discussion of your changes at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Australian politics. Rather than edit war further, it would be great if you could join that discussion. Nick-D (talk) 08:38, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Labor Left, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 10:10, 11 July 2019 (UTC)