User talk:Llywrch/review

This is an interesting review. My first thought is that it would work better if you rearranged it. The first two paragraphs explaining what the book is about in general terms don't make clear why Wikipedians should care about this book; that content, I think, makes more sense after you've made the case for Wikipedia as independent scholarship with its peculiar joys and frustrations.--ragesoss (talk) 00:32, 23 September 2009 (UTC)