User talk:Lmc99/sandbox/Moonlight Basin Current

Round 1 feedback
Hi ! Great work on your article so far. You made substantive additions to the three sections and you did a lot to reorganize and polish the information that was already there. Your version is better organized and easier to read. You also improved the sourcing of the claims in the article. I'd still like to see if you can add more new information to the article that wasn't there before. I can see this might be a challenge as the resort is closed and merged with Big Sky so there might not be any new developments or publications, but I wonder if anything of interest has happened since the merger or maybe there's more information about the golf course or conservation efforts. Other than that, I think that continuing to improve the article by copyediting seems like a good way to continue improving this article. Good job so far and I'm excited to see what else you can do to develop it!

Groceryheist (talk) 05:55, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Message from
I posted a peer review for you! Jeffdnguyen921 (talk) 12:48 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Round 2 feedback
Greetings, has left you some really helpful feedback in his peer review (link) and I urge you to take a look and start making revisions to prepare to publish your version of the article. had lots of praise for your work and I agree that your version of the article is really much better. When you started working on it, the article was rated as a wp:stub on Wikipedia's quality scale and I think it is getting close to being a wp:start-class article.

In his feedback said that you've done a good job with the lead, but that you might introduce the article's sections and I agree that this would be a good way to round out the lead.

I still think that it would be good to add more information as I described in my first round of feedback (above).

Finally, I suggest you take a look at my page on polishing your article for ideas for your next round of work on this project. I especially think that doing things like adding wikilinks, "also see" links, categories, and external links are good things to do when polishing an article. I also suggest that you spend some time carefully copyediting the information you've already added to make it as easy to read as possible while maintaining an wp:encyclopedic tone. Reach out to me if you'd like more feedback or when you think you're ready to make your article live. I'm looking forward to seeing where this ends up! Groceryheist (talk) 21:42, 4 February 2021 (UTC)