User talk:Lmf9/State feminism

Hi! I hope this helps with your article :)

Overall, this article is well structured and has the groundwork for a very good article, but there is still development needed. The article has a strong start that comprehensively leads into the following sections. The content that is included in the somewhat short sections is well written and maintains a neutral stance. However, the article could look into more countries that have implemented feminist policies. Additionally, the author could go more in depth with the sections that it does offer. The student could look into doing this work and even being more geographically organized with the different countries it discusses. In the edit that the student has made, two examples of state feminism are brought up, but not explored. The student should look more into the examples they brought up and further develop the section they are editing. Additionally, the article seems to conflate feminism in certain countries and state feminism. As the student edits the article and adds to it, they must be careful to adhere to the subject of their article. For example, the section on Sweden directs the reader to “Feminism in Sweden”, which is useful if a reader is trying to learn specifically about state feminism. In the criticism section, the student could look into adding a criticism about this and more generally about how state feminism is defined. At this point, the article is still underdeveloped and could use more depth.

Gdelc03111 (talk) 04:54, 9 December 2021 (UTC)Agustin del Campo