User talk:Lmhswikipedia

Ways to improve We are number one
Hi, I'm HenryMP02. Lmhswikipedia, thanks for creating We are number one!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Hello, you recently created the page We are number one. Please consider adding more content and sourcing, as it might get deleted if it isn't deemed notable (see WP:N). Henry TALK  18:43, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Henry TALK  18:43, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of We are number one
Hello Lmhswikipedia,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged We are number one for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is significant enough to be included in an encyclopedia, and the artist doesn't have an article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Henry TALK  18:44, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Contested, contested, contested. Lmhswikipedia (talk) 18:47, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of We are number one


The article We are number one has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * No evidence of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Adam9007 (talk) 18:59, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of We are number one for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article We are number one is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/We are number one until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Adam9007 (talk) 19:17, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

November 2016
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Bishonen &#124; talk 21:58, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Unblocked
I speedy deleted the article per WP:A9, but that has been contested, so I've unblocked you for now. If you continue to make nonsense edits such as, you may be reblocked, though. Bishonen &#124; talk 03:46, 7 November 2016 (UTC).

December 2017
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is only being used for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Drmies (talk) 02:30, 8 December 2017 (UTC)