User talk:Lmlmss44

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~, which will automatically produce your name and the date.
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or place  on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zdenek_Konvalina I removed one empty external link,but the only other one looks like a spam link to a commercial website having nothing to do with the subject. Shall I remove it? Also the subject and his wife both have non-private instagram accounts that look interesting. Can those be linked to or just newspaper articles? Lmlmss44 (talk) 06:33, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
 * I agree with you, and you should remove it. As for their Instagram pages, I think it's appropriate per WP:ELOFFICIAL but just the subject's one should be added. Thanks, Darylgolden(talk) Ping when replying 06:46, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
 * I have removed the link. Darylgolden(talk) Ping when replying 06:48, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

=== https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silvio_Amato This page is one long list in conflict with the "what wikileaks is not" guidance. I want to remove some of the films and link to IMDB. All of various compositions can be trimmed. How ruthless should/can I be with these lists? A long time ago, I trimmed a list of publications, some of which were not open access, and someone reverted all of them. I wasted hours of work. I'd rather search for articles about the composer and just try to figure out his most notable works.Thanks. Lmlmss44 (talk) 05:28, 19 January 2018 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 04:29, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

Shiva Ayyadurai
Please see WP:TPG and WP:NOTFORUM. The comments you put on the talk page clearly violate them and are not acceptable Wikipedia conduct. Please refrain from continuing to engage in edit warring your soapbox comments on the article talk page since they are not clearly about improving the article. If such disruptive behavior continues, you may end up getting banned by an administrator. Thank you. TylerDurden8823 (talk) 22:08, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Okay, HELP then. My "soapbox" is a call for neutrality in tone and information. This subject is not getting an unbiased treatment. This article violates standards on writing about living people. It is contentious and hostile and not fair to the subject. Who can edit this article so it is neutral, fair and balanced? I'm not the first reader to notice this problem with regard to this article. This deserves a review of some sort. I have seen Wikipedia subjects, dead and alive, subjected to ridicule, gossip, rumor etc..before, and it is wrong. I don't like slanted advocacy articles, regardless of the POV; that is fine on Twitter, not here!Lmlmss44 (talk) 22:48, 24 January 2021 (UTC)