User talk:Lnd2024

August 2023
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Equanimitous (talk) 00:39, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, you may be blocked from editing. - Eureka Lott 00:50, 22 August 2023 (UTC)


 * I provided adequate explanation. There is false information on the page that needs to be removed. Lnd2024 (talk) 00:51, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
 * There are several studies to support the use of ivermectin in treatment of Covid. Lnd2024 (talk) 00:56, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Why did you initially say "fixed typo" in your edit summary, twice? You do not seem here to build an encyclopedia, but instead, seem to have come here with an axe to grind.  Stop lying in your edit summaries, and then we'll talk.   Equanimitous (talk) 00:58, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
 * You don’t seem like you want to build an encyclopedia, but instead, insert your political bias through falsehood. Lnd2024 (talk) 01:03, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Ivermectin shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.''You've already blown past this bright-line rule. Please self-revert.'' Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 01:06, 22 August 2023 (UTC)


 * So did the other user. Lnd2024 (talk) 01:08, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Who? Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 01:09, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
 * User:Equanimitous Lnd2024 (talk) 01:10, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:09, 22 August 2023 (UTC)


 * So you think ignoring science and promoting a political opinion is building an encyclopedia? What a joke. Lnd2024 (talk) 01:11, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
 * I can see you’re not really dedicated to making an encyclopedia because you refuse to discuss and resolve disputes. Lnd2024 (talk) 01:15, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
 * This project is based on reliable sources and where questions about sources arise then it comes down to community WP:CONSENSUS. Your edits were clearly contrary to the crystal clear scientific consensus on the subject. We do not permit editors to push agendas or promote fringe theories, including conspiracy theories, and pseudo-scientific medical quackery. If you wish to promote that sort of thing there is no shortage of dark corners on the internet. Pick one. Talk page access is revoked. -Ad Orientem (talk) 01:56, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:57, 22 August 2023 (UTC)