User talk:Lneedell

Welcome!
Hello Lneedell and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions, such as your edit to the page Typhoid Mary, seem to be advertising or for promotional purposes. Wikipedia does not allow advertising. For more information on this, please see: If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write   below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia: I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Dawn Bard (talk) 16:28, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Policy on neutral point of view
 * Guideline on spam
 * Guideline on external links
 * Guideline on conflict of interest
 * FAQ for Organizations
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and how to develop articles
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * Article wizard for creating new articles
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Linkspam
I've removed your links. If you persist in reposting them, I'll block your account from editing.

June 2013
This is your last warning. The next time you insert a spam link, as you did at PS General Slocum, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Rklawton (talk) 17:49, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Listen - you have an obvious conflict of interest. You are adding links to our articles that benefit you personally, and you've got multiple editors telling you to knock it off. Take a hint. This is an encyclopedia - not a tool for your personal marketing. Rklawton (talk) 17:51, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Maybe you should take a look at the work. I will refrain from wikipedia because it is so zealously guarded by people who thrive on taking down other people's work rather than making their own. Original 3D photos taken on an island with restricted access are APPROPRIATE FURTHER READING. Your zealousness is misplaced.

You've got a non-name application on iTunes with so few reviews they can't even calculate an average rating, and somehow you think it's worth posting links to it in an encyclopedia? Get over yourself. Rklawton (talk) 18:02, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Actually I think you need to get over yourself. The photographer has been in a Whitney Biennial and is an internationally exhibited video artist. He wrote a proposal to visit the Island which was accepted. He went there on a Parks Dept boat and took these photos. I am sorry you are such a sheep that you can't see the value in that. I stand by what I said.