User talk:Lošmi

Grand Royal Coat of Arms of France & Navarre
Hi Lošmi, I've fixed the mistake now, Thanks for pointing it out! Sodacan (talk) 20:08, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Hello.
Hi, Miloše! :) Tell me, are you admin on sr wiki? All best! -- Tadijaspeaks 17:55, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, i was reorganising this
 * WikiProject Serbia/Participants
 * So, as i remember from some photos, you were in the Dom Omladine on wiki meetings, so somewhere in my mind i thought that you were an admin. It was easiest to ask you, them search... :) Thanks anyway! You are cool! What do you think about new list? All best! -- Tadijaspeaks 21:01, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

Činč
Morao sam da načinim neke male izmene u članku o grupi Činč. Uradio sam to iz najbolje namere, i doterao sam članak po uobičajenim standardima koji važe za članke o bendovima. Javljam ti ovo zato što postoji velika šansa da vratiš članak u prethodno stanje (što obićno rade oni koji naprave članak o nekom bendu da bi ga malo reklamirali), ali imaj u vidu da članak mora ozbiljno delovati da bi ga neko ozbiljno shvatio. Ostalocutanje (talk) 19:19, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Ja se bavim uglavnom člancima o srpskim i (u nešto manjoj meri) jugoslovenskim rock bendovima i izvođačima. Čini mi se da je članak o Činču tvoj jedini doprinos u ovoj oblasti (izvini ako grešim). Zato sam pretpostavio da si jedan od mnogih koji se prijave samo da bi napravili članak o nekom bendu (neretko su to i sami članovi benda, što je po meni baš jadno), a taj bend članak najčešće ne zaslužuje. Sa takvim korisnicima često ratujemo - čini mi se da ih ima dosta na srpskoj Vikipediji? Ja smatram da imenima kao što su Duh Nibor, Krivokletnik, Skepsa i još nekolicini ne treba da ima mesta na Vikipediji pa ni na srpskoj. Ako tamo dopuštate nekome da se reklamira, mi se ovde trudimo da to ne činimo. Po mom skromnom mišljenju, i mišljenju još jednog korisnika koji se bavi člancima o srpskoj rock sceni, bend Činč članak još uvek (naglašam ovo još uvek) ne zaslužuje, ali nismo ni mi sveznajući kada je o srpskoj muzičkoj sceni reč, vrlo je moguće da grešimo. E sad, što se tiče "ozbiljnosti" ona se odnosi pre svega na vizuelnu stranu članka, na sitnice koje njegov izgled usklađuju sa izgledom članaka o muzičkim grupama. To je ono što sam uradio. Uklonio sam veze za članove benda jer mislim da je teško da će ikada dobiti svoje članke. Uklonio sam i imena nepostojećih muzičkih žanrova. Svestan sam želje članova Činča da izmisle poneki novi žanr, ili budu predstavnici nekog skoro izmišljenog žanra, ali bih pričekao pre nego što ih okarakatreišem...ne sećam se više ni ja kako, uglavnom, pričekao bih barem dok ti žanrovi ne dobiju članak na Wikipedii. Ono "zbirka pop i rok pesama" sam izbrisao jer nisam znao da je deo zvaničnog imena albuma. A jedina rečenica koju sam uklonio iz samog teksta je ona koja kaže da u njihove melodije kompleksne, a tekstovi (čini mi se da je pisalo) duhoviti. Članak nije kritika. Ostalocutanje (talk) 18:32, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Nisam rekao da si član benda, niti da ja i još jedan uređivač, ne daj Bože, imamo monopol na članke o srpskim bendovima. Uostalom, članak je tu, zar ne? Možda bi i u članku i moglo da se nađe da imaju neobične tekstove, ali mislim da izbor reči treba da odgovara enciklopeiji. Ostalocutanje (talk) 19:03, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Problem je u sva tri prideva. Možda je reč unusual bolja od weird i peculiar? Ali ko osim kritičara može reći da su melodije "sofisticirane"? A što se tiče rečenice iz članka o Motorheadu, sigurno je da nije enciklpoedijska. Jedino što me sprečava da odem i promenim je to što smatram da će neko od stotina korsinika koje rad na tom članku zanima to već srediti... Ostalocutanje (talk) 20:00, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Ako ti ta recenica toliko znaci, vrati je... Ostalocutanje (talk) 13:43, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Usagi Yojimbo Characters
Template:Usagi Yojimbo Characters has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 19:40, 6 November 2010 (UTC)

Ratko Mladić - Serbian script
Hello. There is a small problem with this arrangement when we apply Serbian Cyrillic for Cyrillic-only requirements. As multi-script languages are relatively rare, the default system here is designed to take Serbian for its Cyrillic form only, most likely based on its status in Serbia's constitution which gives it rank over Latinic. This is why any text inserted into {lang-hr} will be in italics (Roman script) but in normal form for {lang-sr}. When subjects are given in English as in their Serbian Latinic (transliterated) form, it requires only a Cyrillic presentation, as with Mladić. When you have something needing a full translation (e.g. Belgrade), we then need /Београд, Beograd/. The trouble with {lang-sr} is that it doesn't accommodate this need and we are forced to compensate manually (eg. {lang-sr|Београд}, 'Beograd'), etc. One way or another, we can never use the {lang-sr} facility without one problem. Because of this, I believe it is fine to use Cyrillic only, it is more or less clear from the article name that the name is based on Serbian in the first place. Evlekis (Евлекис) 12:43, 29 May 2011 (UTC)


 * You're right about the constitution and about the widespread usage. Don't get me wrong, your edit was correct and I don't contest it. I'm just saying that {lang-sr} is set up for Cyrillic only. If you put Roman letters in, it won't italise. Evlekis (Евлекис) 12:21, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Serbian salad-01.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Serbian salad-01.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fleet Command (talk) 17:44, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

File:Serbian salad-01.jpg
Hello, Lošmi.

Unfortunately, I am unable to fulfill your rename request because the file is not located on Wikipedia; rather, it is located on Wikimedia Commons. To rename the file, please follow this link and file your rename request there:
 * commons:File:Serbian_salad-01.jpg

Regards, Fleet Command (talk) 17:47, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Politikin Zabavnik 73.png)
Thanks for uploading File:Politikin Zabavnik 73.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 14:34, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Zabavnik latinica.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Zabavnik latinica.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:31, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

An invitation to join the WikiProject Republika Srpska
--Anulmanul (talk) 21:49, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Quixotic plea
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Wikipediholism test. Thanks. —  06:38, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:B92 Cube Logo, 2012.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:B92 Cube Logo, 2012.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:25, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Potpis tadic.gif listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Potpis tadic.gif, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

File:Potpis tadic.svg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Potpis tadic.svg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 05:03, 24 November 2022 (UTC)