User talk:Lobeveeps

Edit warring and POV-pushing
You appear to be engaging in anti-religion POV-pushing edit wars at Performance art and Enemy, adding images to the pages that do not fit well with the topics of those pages, and with overtones that appear to be intended to mock the religious beliefs associated with those images. Please desist from this behavior. Where an image that you have added to a page has been removed, do not revert the removal of that image. Rather, initiate a discussion on the talk page to generate a consensus in favor of inclusion of that image. Pinging for any additional thoughts, as you have also reverted his removal of an image. bd2412 T 01:52, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
 * The image additions are largely problematic and unexplained; I don't have anything else to add to bd2412's comments. power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 01:55, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
 * No anti-religion here buddy. For performance art, I added a "citation needed" which is his edit summary by the way.Lobeveeps (talk) 02:32, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Oh well, guess I'll discuss.Lobeveeps (talk) 02:33, 17 April 2018 (UTC)::
 * Also, some of the images you reverted are clearly relevant to their articles; for example, you reverted away the religious image I added even though the title of the article is "Prophet"Lobeveeps (talk) 02:39, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
 * No, Power did not revert my removing of an image, he reverted my adding of an image.Lobeveeps (talk) 02:41, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Prophet already contains numerous religious images. There is no need to add another, and in many of these cases there is no need to add more images to pages that already have them. You are also removing images already on the page to add your images, without any discussion of whether those images should be removed. bd2412  T 03:05, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

April 2018
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring, as you did at Performance art. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. bd2412 T 03:12, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

I'm fine with the image on Performance art as it stands (it's a bit odd, but justified well enough in the absence of any other suggested images), but the un-awareness of the edit-warring rules means that I support keeping the block. power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 03:23, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
 * I would add that I specifically informed Lobeveeps that he needs to discuss reverted image additions rather than just counter-reverting, and this was clearly ignored. bd2412  T 03:46, 17 April 2018 (UTC)