User talk:Locador

User:Edward/Find link


 * }

Link to Museum
Hi, you linked the Naval Museum of Montevideo as "Uruguay Naval Museum". If you intend to start an article on it, please use the name "Naval Museum of Montevideo" instead (http://www.histarmar.com.ar/Museos/MuseoNavalMontevideo.htm 1). Thank you. Hoverfish Talk 19:18, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

WoTP
Writing several names in the introduction is not constructive. Please stop disrupting the article. bla bla bla. You've been two years here, I assume you know the drill. Also, please get acquainted with WP:RDR and WP:LEAD. An etymology section used to be part of the article, but it apparently got removed at some point. If you want, you can re-include it and there list all the names that come to your mind. Regards.-- MarshalN20 | T al k 04:32, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Salitre War (Mexico), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Zapotlán and Sayula (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:28, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

February 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to User talk:Aravind REDrive with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.   Wikipelli Talk   16:43, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
 * huh? Locador (talk) 16:45, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
 * I can't really understand why, but it appears that you blanked another user's talk page. Is there a reason? If you're only taking your own comments off, that's fine and I apologize for reverting you. There was no edit summary so all I saw was one editor blanking another editor's page.   Wikipelli Talk   16:47, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

Not vandalism
This does not appear to be vandalism. You templated the (new) user for it. Please explain why you call it vandalism? Thanks. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:08, 25 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Considering his other edits, it does appear to be vandalism. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 04:01, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Message
04:00, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Message
06:04, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:25, 24 November 2015 (UTC)