User talk:Localhost83

You just finished your block
You just finished a 1 month block for personal attacks and disruptive editing. The hostile edit summaries and insistence in adding unsourced material because you know it is right is exactly why you were blocked last time.

You have made exactly 49 edits and far less if you discount this user talk page. You are causing far too much disruption for too little of a contribution. I suggest you play nice with others if you want to avoid an indefinite block. HighInBC Need help? Just ask. 10:22, 16 July 2021 (UTC)


 * It is not my fault if the italian press says something but you are too lazy to search and too discriminatory to ask for sources only to me while the previous text didn't contain any source. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Localhost83 (talk • contribs) 10:25, 16 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Who is right or wrong is not relevant. The burden of providing the source is on the person seeking to add the information. Personal attacks are not allowed regardless of how right you think you are. Edit warring is not permitted. I have no intention of going back and forth with you. You have been made aware of these standards and what will happen if you refuse to follow them. HighInBC Need help? Just ask. 10:38, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:20, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

July 2021
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. RickinBaltimore (talk) 11:37, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
 * (Was part the way through doing the same, but will still leave this note)
 * Regardless of how sourced (or unsourced) other editor's additions may have been, content must be verifiable and it is your responsibility to provide sources. However, this issue is secondary to your unnecessary and hostile behaviour - Wikipedia is just a website, and getting to the point of being that downright rude is inappropriate. - TheresNoTime 😺 11:43, 16 July 2021 (UTC)