User talk:Loccitane

Orphaned non-free media (File:Nashville Scene Cover.pdf)
Thanks for uploading File:Nashville Scene Cover.pdf. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:23, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Dancin' In The Clouds
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Dancin' In The Clouds, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process
 * Non-notable song.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. TN X Man 21:39, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

Jaclyn Smith
Please stop adding redundant material to the article. We don't need to have the same information in two places. OhNo itsJamie Talk 20:44, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

May 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from 1 a Minute. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Also please note that giving special weight to a specific person on Wikipedia is a non-neutral point of view. You may want to look at Conflict of interest and see if there are Wikipedia guidelines that apply to your situation in relation to Namrata Singh Gujral. Thank you. --Closeapple (talk) 15:03, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of 1 a Minute
I have nominated 1 a Minute, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/1 a Minute. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Closeapple (talk) 07:10, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 20:27, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

August 2010
The recent edit you made to the page 1 a Minute has been reverted, as it removed all content from the page without explanation. Please do not do this, as it is considered vandalism; use the sandbox for testing. If you think the page should be deleted, see this page for instructions. Thank you. みんな空の下 (トーク) 00:46, 30 August 2010 (UTC)



And yes, I know the page blanking was done in frustration. Always best to ask someone for input before reacting. Patience here is often rewarded here.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. has given you a bubble tea! Bubble teas promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a bubble tea, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy drinking!

Spread the awesomeness of bubble teas by adding to someone's talk page with a friendly message!

What a welcome...
It's always tough to have one's first communications on Wikipedia to be about one's work being under possible deletion. All that said... I offer User:MichaelQSchmidt/Newcomer's guide to guidelines as a starting point in understanding how to get around in this place.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q.

Thank you so much. When do we know if the article "1 a Minute" is being kept or deleted? Is there a time span after which the votes are tallied? Thanks again...Loccitane (talk) 02:23, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

It's an article!
Due the input and cleanup performed by several editors in showing 1 a Minute as notable, the article has strongly survived the deletion discussion. In its present improved condition, it is unlikely that anyone will think badly of it ever again. And though yes... the wheels seem to turn slowly sometime... they DO turn. Thanks for your patience.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 04:52, 5 September 2010 (UTC)