User talk:Locke Perkins

Welcome!
Welcome to Wikipedia, Locke Perkins! Thank you for your contributions. I am Lixxx235 and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Questions or type at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes ( ~ ); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Cheers, Thanks,  L235 - Talk Ping when replying 00:46, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article
 * Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

From Hatigges
Hi there! I'm doing my best to navigate around Wikipedia, so I thought I'd stop by and check on how this experiences has treated you so far. Are you hanging in there? It has taken me quite some time to find what I am looking for, but am slowly learning. My best advise thus far would be to utilize the Wiki markup cheatsheet, and revert back to the orientation tutorial. It has helped me, although, some areas are slightly unclear. I look forward to grasping a clear understanding of what constitutes an article in need of editing. I have an idea, however, I need to look at these articles with a critical eye. Practice, practice and more practice! Good luck to you. Have a great weekend! Hatigges (talk) 03:45, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

From Bellrive37200
Hello Locke Perkins! My name is Bellerive37200. I am interested in studying about systematic bias in the information about Universal primary education. Perhaps we can assist each other? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bellerive37200 (talk • contribs) 03:52, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

Great start!
Hi LP - I like what you did very much! Keep up the good work. I look forward to seeing where you take the "awkward age" article edits. This is particularly fascinating if you were to go global - is this "awkward stage" true cross culturally? How do other societies mark this transition? Nice job!

In looking at your edit of the youth article, I would like you to clarify the terms "level dependency", what it means to define youth by "personal experience", and what you mean by "various ways." It just needs a bit more polish. Prof.Vandegrift (talk) 03:35, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Interesting
I think the page Youth voice that you found is really interesting. I look forward to seeing your edits. 12thManSeaFan (talk) 03:47, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Feedback
Hey, I really like the idea of looking at the awkward age concept around the world and seeing what kinds of terms are coined for these groups and how their experiences differ. Kjatczak (talk) 23:08, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Great Ideas
Hey Locke Perkins. Your ideas on looking at this specific age period seems very interesting and I look forward to seeing where your work takes you. Maybe we could possibly collaborate?

Cales23 (talk) 23:42, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

=more specific?= I think that this is a very broad topic. I noticed that you had a few references in accordance to technology, within your article some of the potential headings you could have would be self-esteem, technology, dating life, independence, etc. There are lots of components of the awkward transition, so be sure to split things up in a way that is easy to understand for your readers. Psychnut93 (talk) 20:15, 14 September 2014 (UTC)psychnut93Psychnut93 (talk) 20:15, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Proposal Feedback
Locke Perkins,

I think a key question to think about before proceeding is what are the major differences between emerging adulthood in general and youth exclusion? In other words, what justifies this being a separate page? (This isn’t a question that’s meant to make you want to change your topic. I think that answering this question would give you a few ideas about where you can take your article—what sections should there be? What key terms seem important?)

The difficulty, perhaps, in adding individual accounts of youth exclusion is that you may be in danger of typifying the experience of one person to the experiences of an entire country. If you focus more on institutional, policy, and legal barriers of youth exclusion, I think you’ll encounter less critique from the Wikipedia community. It may also be important to consider how systemic bias plays into conceptions of race, socio-economics, education, and socialization. Most of these factors are entirely dependent on the country and they vary across the world.

I also see the possibility of your article getting buried in the Wikipedia universe. How often are people going to search for ‘youth exclusion’? It’ll be crucial for your page to be linked to high traffic pages or put in ‘see also’ lists. Pages like ageism and emerging adulthood will be good places to start. You could even add sentences in those articles that directly reference youth exclusion. Though the edit wouldn’t be directly made on the page your working on, I would consider it improving the article by making it more visible. The lead in paragraph certainly needs some attention, and I think that it’s a really good idea to clean it up. I also think talking about institutions and mechanisms will be a valuable thing to include in your work on the page.

AbbeyMaynard (talk) 18:24, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the feedback.


 * This information has been very helpful. I am narrowing down my project so that I am focusing on understanding youth exclusion in terms of social institutions and cultural contexts. I don't think I will have time to elaborate on individual case studies of youth, but I will look at wider research done in different countries regarding youth exclusion. I have started to gather some resources and have grouped them together to explain the main areas of focus that my edits will have. Thanks again for the insight!


 * --Locke Perkins (talk) 17:01, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

A kitten for you!
Hi LP! You are off to a great start. I think that Abbey's feedback will serve you well as you begin your edits. You have a solid list of sources. Your next step is to look through them carefully to see what information you have. This will help you to narrow your scope and do fact-based edits.

Let me know if I can be of help. You are well on your way to having what you need to write your sandbox draft.

Prof.Vandegrift (talk) 21:05, 4 October 2014 (UTC) 