User talk:Lockesdonkey/Archive 1

Hi, I noticed that you want to move the page I created: Ancient's Healing Device (Stargate). After reading your comments, I think you are right and agree. The only problem, is that sevral pages already redirect to it. There might be double redirects. Just something to watch out for. If you need help with anything, just ask. Tobyk777 04:18, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

After reading your and that other guy's comments on its talk page, I reread what I wrote and. The article is not about technology in general. It's about this specific device. This is about a piticular gadget. This article isn't about their supernatural abilities. It's about the device. Their abilities should probably go on their main page. I just moved it and fixed all double redirects. So I saved you the trouble. I also posted this comment on its talk page. Tobyk777 00:42, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

Minor edits
Edits like the one you did recently on the Farscape article(|Link) should probably be flagged as minor, as it's just a grammar issue. That way we know that it's just something grammatical. Smeggysmeg 02:13, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

Sakshama
please unprotect the page Sakshama, when wikipedia is having articles for techfest, techniche and other technical fetivals. then why not a article for sakshama, a technical festival which was started from a small town of india in the year 2007 and now it is going to celebrate it's third version and it has been said as no #1 technical festival of north india. so i want to write a page for it please unprotect it. you can find more at http://sakshama.org or you can find the same communities on orkut and other social web Aashish K Mahaswary (talk) 15:47, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

Jacob still has his article
I posted this in the talk page after your comment, but I wanted you to know that the Jacob Carter article still exists. Lady Aleena 21:23, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

Stargate
It looked like you removed a fair bit of content and without an edit summary, well, I'm sure you can realize what happened. The template is basically automatic for me. Sorry if you took offense Tawker 04:33, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

DNA Resequecner
Hi, on the wikiproject Stargate page you wrote that Stargate SG-1 is under peer review. It isn't. The only two articles under review are Stargate (device) and DNA Resequencer (Stargate).

I would have to say that the organization and quality of the DNA article is very good, as good as many FAs. While yes, your point is valid that is not of general interest, look what article appeared on the main page today. If that can be featured DNA resequencer can. As I stated above it is currently under peer review. Do you really think it's not good enough to become an FA? I think it is, it's one of the most comprehensive articles, and probably the largest source on the topic in existance. Why do you think it isn't worthy. Mabe I could fix it? Tobyk777 05:50, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

Spelling
I noticed that you have been criticizing my spelling recently. I just wanted you to know that I am a horrible speller and I admit it. There is no need for more criticsm. I spell as well as i can. Too bad there is no spell check on WP. Tobyk777 00:02, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

64.88.86.3.
64.88.86.3. is the address of youth services (read: teenager) computers at the Troy, Michigan Public Library. In other words, the vandalism probably won't occur again. Lockesdonkey 22:47, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

This address is used by ALL schools in Macomb county and all public libraries (or at least most) in Macomb county, which is 1,000's of computers.

DNA Resequencer pics
Hi, I am trying to add pictures to DNA Resequencer as you sugested. The only fair use pic I have found so far is

I cant figure out how to get onto wikipedia. do you know how? Tobyk777 20:48, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

Your statement of opinion on Templates-for-deletion
Your statement on Templates-for-deletion related to the deletion of the religion-related userboxes was a very positive statement about Wikipedia and contributors to it. Thank you; I liked what you said. User:Ceyockey ( talk to me ) 22:53, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

Political interps of the Wizard of Oz

 * Sorry -- that kind of thing looks like vandalism, and since you didn't cite your source (and it came from an IP address), I just assumed it was in fact vandalism. It would help if you did cite the source. You might also consider just adding it to the talk page, though I think citing the source would make it work fine, though it's up to you. Hope this helps. I'll remove the warning from that IP address. Sorry for that! Meeples 03:18, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Seal of the United States Senate
There's been some back and forth edits on what graphic should be used as the Seal of the United States Senate in the United States Senate article. In order to resolve the disagreement, I'm trying to start some discussion on the issue on the article's talk page. Since you're one of the editors that has edited the Senate article in regards to the Seal graphic, I thought I'd let you know about the discussion in case you want to weigh in. Thanks. - Walkiped (T 06:53, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

???
I did not revert that change. Why are you talking to me? Will (Talk - contribs) 00:24, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I think I now understand what happened. The diff you provided didn't have an edit summary.  So you forced me to rely on the diff to decide which edit was vandalism and which wasn't.  Martha Stewart has been one of the most vandalized pages today.  I probably misread the diff I saw (using popups by Lupin, both the before and after parts get merged into one column).  My apologies.


 * For more tips on how to avoid being mistaken for a vandal, please see my user page. Will (Talk - contribs) 00:42, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for contributing at Non-binding resolution! — xaosflux  Talk  19:59, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

fair use in portals
there is currently a proposed amendment to include fair use images in the portal space at Fair use/Amendment/Fair use images in portals2. I have decided to contact you because you expressed interest in this topic in the past. Please know that I am contacting all editors who partipated in discussions regarding this at WT:FUC. If you feel I contactd you in error, or just don't care :) please ignore me. -ΖαππερΝαππερ BabelAlexandria 22:55, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Image:Truthiness2.JPG
Hello Lockesdonkey, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:Truthiness2.JPG) was found at the following location: User:Lockesdonkey. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg, so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not re-add the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 04:43, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Apologies
Sorry for that. But please make sure that you always log in to avoid situations like this, or redirect your IP talk page to here. Peace.  Sp art an- Ja mes  17:51, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Template:1780 Encyclopedie
A template you created, Template:1780 Encyclopedie, has been marked for deletion as a deprecated and orphaned template. If, after 14 days, there has been no objection, the template will be deleted. If you wish to object to its deletion, please list your objection here and feel free to remove the tag from the template. If you feel the deletion is appropriate, no further action is necessary. Cheers. --MZMcBride 20:05, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Template:1780 Encyclopedia
A template you created, Template:1780 Encyclopedia, has been marked for deletion as a deprecated and orphaned template. If, after 14 days, there has been no objection, the template will be deleted. If you wish to object to its deletion, please list your objection here and feel free to remove the tag from the template. If you feel the deletion is appropriate, no further action is necessary. Cheers. --MZMcBride 20:05, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Please use edit summaries
Hello. Please be courteous to other editors and use edit summaries when updating articles. The Mathbot tool shows your usage of edit summaries to be very low:


 * Edit summary usage for Lockesdonkey: 11% for major edits and 32% for minor edits. Based on the last 150 major and 22 minor edits in the article namespace.

Using edit summaries helps other editors quickly understand your edits, which is especially useful when you make changes to articles that are on others' watchlists. Thanks and happy editing! --Kralizec! (talk) 15:14, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

Parliamentary Chamber infobox
I see a disagreement between CJ and Lockesdonkey about creation of a new infobox in the Australian Senate article. I thought the infobox was quite a good assembly of information dispersed throughout the article (some of it not easily found). I note Lockesdonkey's observation that these are used in other legislature pages, though the format is not always standard (compare Bundestag with Scottish Parliament for example). Unless WP has a policy that an infobox should not duplicate information in an article in any way (in which case, there seem to be a lot of info boxes that need removing!), i would favour its retention. I am posting this to both user pages, reverting the removal of the box for now, and await discussion at the Senate talkpage. hamiltonstone 23:26, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Fair use images in the userspace
I have removed the image Image:Beatles - Abbey Road.jpg from your userspace User:Lockesdonkey/Userboxes/ComeTogether. Please be aware that images that are clamied as fair use have a restriction in location:


 * From the policy page Non-free content criteria
 * 9. Restrictions on location. Non-free content is allowed only in articles (not disambiguation pages), and only in article namespace, subject to exemptions. (To prevent an image category from displaying thumbnails, add __NOGALLERY__ to it; images are linked, not inlined, from talk pages when they are a topic of discussion.)

Placing non-free images in the userspace like you did on User:Lockesdonkey/Userboxes/ComeTogether is a violation and has been removed. Please do not restore this image without consultation. Thank you. —  Κ aiba 17:04, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Corned beef
Hi there. Thanks for your recent addition to Corned beef. It's an interesting anecdote, but one that really needs to be sourced - as it is it falls under the heading of original research. If you can find a source for the information, please feel free to re-add it. Cheers, -- JediLofty User ¦ Talk 08:35, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject The Office (US)
Hey there. Saw that you're a fan of the show and have worked on some articles pertaining to it, so I just wanted to extend an invitation to you to join The Office Wikiproject. If you'd like to join, you can list your name under the "Active Members" section of the page. Thanks, and have a great day! Mastrchf (t/c) 23:54, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

AfD
I've nominated Obama Republican and McCain Democrat for deletion. Northwestgnome (talk) 18:36, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

Hillel: The Foundation for Jewish Campus Life
I am leaving you this note because you have edited this article in the past. While vandal-watching today I noticed the removal by of the entire "Criticism" section. This looked to me like common vandalism, so I reverted it with the rollback tool. Checking the article history, I saw that rollback had reverted a string of 12 edits and, checking them, it was clearly not a case of simple vandalism: on the other hand, the edits showed a pattern of removing properly-sourced criticism and inserting favourable opinions which suggested that CaseyHamMD had a COI and was not editing from a NPOV. He had made one earlier edit of a similar type, which I have also reverted.

He is a new editor, first edit 24 Sep, and his talk page was blank. I have given him a standard welcome paragraph and a note explaining what I have done, outlining relevant WP policies, and inviting him if he wants his changes made to outline them on the article talk page and try to reach consensus.

As I personally know nothing about the subject, I am posting this note to editors who have worked on the article and seem to be still active, so that they can take part in the discussion and/or watch the article.

Regards, JohnCD (talk) 23:00, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

Election infobox
The fact that the infobox is being misused elsewhere does not make it ok to put it on the Israeli article. It's managed to exist just fine without it for a few months, so I don't see the need to add it. The election is hugely unpredictable - undecided voters are probably at their highest ever, and, as shown at the last elections, polls can be a long way (5+ seats) out, which means that in theory any of the top 4 could win, and any of the next batch could come fifth.

More generally, I do not believe that the infobox is a good thing - I've noted as such on its talk page a couple of times. Unless someone can devise one capable of containing numerous (15-20) parties in manageable format, they are nothing but POV violations. пﮟოьεԻ  5  7  16:23, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I beg to disagree, infobox is to show a graphical representation of the elections and it does not show a POV violation plus it shows the parties who could actually win the elections or in the case of Israel, form the government. Rizalninoynapoleon (talk) 05:44, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

Kucinich: Mayorship versus Mayoralty
I was going to get all snippy about why you changed Mayorship to Mayoralty. I looked up several places and found Mayorship to be a perfectly acceptable word. It wasn't until I looked at this page with definitions that I found that mayorship just means the office of the mayor while mayoralty may also mean the the term of office of Mayor which was the intent in the article. I defer to your wisdom. Good catch!--Ccady (talk) 20:30, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Terraced houses
Hi Locky, I note the heading you have put on the page. Terraced housing (single houses built in the 19th and early 20th century in rows with common walls) has been a predominantly British, North American and Australian style but, as you rightly point out, despit the fact that this style originated in Britain during the industrial revolution, there are probably examples from outside the English speaking world. Because this style of housing development was often adopted as a method of cheaply housing huge numbers of industrial workers we also see large numbers of these houses in areas such as the Netherlands, Northern France and Belgium. I would love to see examples on the Terraced House page as well and have invited comments on the talk page.

In most other areas of the planet, the preferred solution to mass housing was the development of multi storey apartments (Germany, Itay, Spain, most Asian Nations) and this was often a result of different legislation in the comminity. A great example is Scotland. Even though Scotland has been part of the United kingdom since the seventeenth century they have maintained their own body of legislation. Unlike England, in Scotland it was possible to own a 'slice of air' such as an apartment three storeys off the ground. In the nineteenth century this enabled the building of huge numbers of very solid tenement apartments, which never occurred in England. As a result you won't find terraced houses in Scotland to the same degree as in England.

In the USA there were also local differences in planning legislation so that, for example Baltimore and Philadelphia are just about wall to wall row houses, yet Chicago in the same period built mostly detached dwellings although very close together.

I would certainly welcome including other language group terraced houses if we can get some contribiutions from non English comminities. Any thoughts on this?

Cheers'

Michael (Australia) --MichaelGG (talk) 10:57, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Dennis Kucinich
Regarding your edit to the Dennis Kucinich page, thanks for fixing the grammar, but please remember to assume good faith. Your comment for the edit summery ("Use good English!") came off as a bit harsh, and it seemed to be a simple mistake on the other users part. Coolgamer (talk) 14:12, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

Nuclear prog of Saudia Arabia
Hi, re: your addition "more vocal opponents of nuclear weapons in the Middle East". Do you have a reliable source that states that or something along those lines ? Perhaps it's in the existing refs, I haven't looked. The statement needs to come from an RS as per WP:V or else I guess we need to remove it to avoid WP having an editorial opinion (see MOS:OPED).  Sean.hoyland  - talk 04:03, 25 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Hi, I think it is interpretation in the sense that it is WP placing Saudia Arabia somewhere on an implied for or against continuous scale, it kind of implies a contrast with other states and it's not supported by an RS right now (despite probably being true). Saying something straightforward like "opposes" might be simpler and is supported by our refs. Anyway, it's your decision. I don't mind either way. :)  Sean.hoyland  - talk 05:02, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Coat of arms of Egypt
Thanks for the infobox; the last attempt to introduce heraldic terminology into the article was not a great success (see that article's talk page). AnonMoos (talk) 00:50, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

G versus J war
G is the Egyptian pronunciation, but J is the pan-Arab standard pronunciation, which is why there have been edit wars in the past... AnonMoos (talk) 08:00, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Irish Mist
Re this edit: Good call.--Srleffler (talk) 22:03, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Question about a template
Hello! Since you are the creator of the Template:Greek politics/leadership race, I've noticed that when you add a party other than Panhellenic Socialist Movement it doesn't appear properly. I don't know how it works to make any change, so could you help? Thank you. - Sthenel (talk) 21:42, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

Help:Translate to Arabic
Hello! I need some help on translation. Please translate the following word to Arabic. Thank you. Amit6 (talk) 16:55, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Bishop of Rome
 * Ecumenical Patriarch of Constantinople
 * Patriarch of Alexandria
 * Patriarch of Antioch
 * Patriarch of Jerusalem
 * Bishopric of Rome
 * Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople
 * Patriarchate of Alexandria
 * Patriarchate of Antioch
 * Patriarchate of Jerusalem
 * Smiley.svg Thank you for your translations. Amit6 (talk) 09:41, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:PM fayyad cropped.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:PM fayyad cropped.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Image Screening Bot (talk) 12:33, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

List of The Thick of It characters
Hi, do you have a source for those sections detailing which real politicians the characters are based on? Other than Tucker/Campbell, which is frequently commented on, I haven't come accross anything referencing those, plausable though they are. Bob talk 07:24, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Trouble is, that really counts as original research, which it's probably best not to include. Bob talk 07:37, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Democratic Social Movement/meta/color
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. GILO ACCIDENT & EMERGENCY  16:42, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

I saw your comments on the Infobox_election template and thought you might like to comment on my similar suggestion on the -elect TBD section. —sroc (talk) 15:09, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Election infobox ([title]-elect TBD section)
I saw your comments on the Infobox_election template and thought you might like to comment on my suggestion on the -elect TBD. —sroc (talk) 15:15, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Mohamed Abdul Salam Mahgoub
Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Mohamed Abdul Salam Mahgoub. The community has decided that all new biographies of living persons must contain a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article as per our verifiability policy. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:11, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Daily Show: Indecision 2006


The article The Daily Show: Indecision 2006 has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * A search for references ("The Daily Show" "Indecision 2006") found a few published (gBooks) minor mentions of the subject, fails WP:N.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:27, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

File:Galaran flag.JPG listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Galaran flag.JPG, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Kelly hi! 05:05, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

Edit on Myrrha
Hey just wanted to know where you got the piece of information you added to my article, that those words meant "bitter". Thanks in advance Mottenen (talk) 16:04, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:ND-Dem-NPL-Logo.JPG
 Thanks for uploading File:ND-Dem-NPL-Logo.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 04:43, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

A gentle reminder

 * On the page of M1 Abrams, your recent edit added a section that had been removed previously as un-encyclopedic content per common consensus on the article page (Talk:M1 Abrams). Please take your time to familiarize yourself first with WP:Consensus & WP:Recentism, and I do hope that you will understand what the other regular editors meant when we say that we are against the adding of such un-encyclopedic content. Thank you and best. -- Dave ♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫® 11:27, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

Egyptian Arabic transcription
Hi Lockes, I was wondering, why do I see people transcribe short initial and medial high vowels with (i, u), when we, in Egypt, don't have them? Instead, we always pronounce and. Is it because their supposed origins are from Arabic language? --Mahmudmasri (talk) 05:27, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:North Dakota Democratic-Nonpartisan League Party logo.JPG
 Thanks for uploading File:North Dakota Democratic-Nonpartisan League Party logo.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. —LinkTiger (talk) 22:52, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Blank/meta/shortname


A tag has been placed on Template:Blank/meta/shortname, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

''"This template may meet Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion as a subpage of a page which does not exist, has been deleted, or is itself currently tagged for speedy deletion." - in this case parent page exists but is completely unreleted''

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Bulwersator (talk) 15:41, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 24
Hi. When you recently edited James Madison College, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Commencement (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:22, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Almohad Caliphate, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Unitarian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:52, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

Language
I congratulate you on your linguistic ability, but having said that, I have to say, too, that one language that you suck at is French. Please don't write nonsense about the French language again, as you did at the RCMP article. "Maintiens le droit" does not mean "Keep right". Thank you. Kelisi (talk) 18:58, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Capitonym, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Herbert (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:08, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dominant-party system, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arab Socialist Union (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:11, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

Vandalism
Since you unblanked the article, congratulations on adding bad information to Wikipedia. You're in good company. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.107.131.23 (talk) 07:21, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Benjamin Franklin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arthur Lee (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 11 December 2012 (UTC)