User talk:Locknessmonster

First advice
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Dave1185 (talk) 06:05, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

Second advice
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Dave1185 (talk) 21:55, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

Third advice
Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Dave1185 (talk) 21:56, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

No spam on 14th Dalai Lama page
Hi Dave, I just wanted to add a couple of links that are negative about Dalai Lama. This is by no means spamming. If you have read through the whole article, and checked up all the existing links and references, and if you are truly neutral on this political issue, you would find that the whole page is a spam! If promoting and advertising is not allowed, then tell me what I am promoting with my links. On the other hand, the whole page itself is promoting and advertising Dalai Lama.

Who decides what links can be put on the page? How about 50% positive and 50% negative? How about setting up "Positive links" and "Negative links" sections? By the way, although I haven't tried, I've been wondering that if I go edit the main text and said something bad about Dalai Lama, will I be allowed?

I don't have to see my contributions on the page, I just want make it look better, not like a political brainwashing propaganda.

Wikipedia isn't doing well in providing space for different ideas, which is no surprise, because no media has as of yet. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Locknessmonster (talk • contribs) 22:52, 27 May 2008 (UTC)


 * First, get the consensus of the masses on the discussion page to agree before adding them in, this article is still being monitored because of too many issues with regards to WP:NPOV. Some may have been solved but not all, so what you are doing now is threading very thin ice, so to speak. Besides, I'm also all for this article to be as NPOV as possible. You got me? --Dave1185 (talk) 22:59, 27 May 2008 (UTC)