User talk:Locomotive207/archive

Your submission at Articles for creation: Woodway Station (New Canaan Branch) (October 2)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Woodway Station (New Canaan Branch) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Woodway Station (New Canaan Branch), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Woodway_Station_(New_Canaan_Branch) Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:AngusWOOF&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Woodway_Station_(New_Canaan_Branch) reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F ( bark  •  sniff ) 19:02, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Woodway Station (New Canaan Branch) (October 4)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by I dream of horses were:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Woodway Station (New Canaan Branch) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Woodway Station (New Canaan Branch), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Woodway_Station_(New_Canaan_Branch) Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:I_dream_of_horses&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Woodway_Station_(New_Canaan_Branch) reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

I dream of horses (Contribs) Please notify me after replying off my talk page. Thank you. 02:16, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

October 2020
Hello, I'm Transcendental36. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Bara-Hack, Connecticut, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page.   Transcendental36 (talk) 15:09, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Welcome!!


Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Kieran207! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:


 * Introductory tutorial
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Writing an article
 * Five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Community portal
 * Task Center
 * Help pages
 * The Teahouse (newcomer help)
 * Main help desk

If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes ( ~ ) to insert your username and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! – MJL &thinsp;‐Talk‐☖ 22:28, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

Thank you!Kieran207 (talk) 16:15, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

Some baklava for you!
Thank you!-Kieran207 (talk)

Wilton media
I see you added back in the bit I deleted about promotional videos of Wilton, CT (although you neglected to offer any explanation). Per WP:BRD, you should discuss reverted material before adding it back in.

I really don't think that the material belongs. "Media" sections of localities generally include newspaper, TV, radio, etc.—not purely promotional material, especially material that does not come from secondary sources. Does that make sense? --Jprg1966 (talk) 16:26, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
 * That makes more sense now,Feel free to take it back out again if you have not done so already.Kieran207 (talk) 17:49, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Cool beans, thanks for talking it through. --Jprg1966 (talk) 03:17, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Woodway Station (New Canaan Branch) has been accepted
 Woodway Station (New Canaan Branch), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Woodway_Station_(New_Canaan_Branch) help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Bkissin (talk) 17:34, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

2004 Connecticut State Senate election moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, 2004 Connecticut State Senate election, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Troutfarm27 (Talk) 00:27, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

Copying licensed material requires attribution
Hi. I see in a recent addition to Survival of the Idiots you included material from a webpage that is available under a compatible Creative Commons Licence. That's okay, but you have to give attribution so that our readers are made aware that you copied the prose rather than wrote it yourself. I've added the attribution for this particular instance. Please make sure that you follow this licensing requirement when copying from compatibly-licensed material in the future. — Diannaa (talk) 04:06, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Survival of the Idiots
Hello, Kieran207

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Kingsif, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Survival of the Idiots, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:


 * 1) [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit Edit the page]
 * 2) Remove the text that looks like this:
 * 3) Click the  button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with. And remember to sign your reply with. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Kingsif (talk) 19:52, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Survival of the Idiots
Hello, Kieran207, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username Kingsif, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Survival of the Idiots, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Survival of the Idiots.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Kingsif (talk) 20:00, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Survival of the Idiots for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Survival of the Idiots, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/Survival of the Idiots until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Aliza Ayaz
Hi, many thanks for reviewing the draft, now Aliza Ayaz. Have reverted the manic cleanup tagging of this accepted AfC by AngusWOOF, the nominator of a previous deletion request (result was draftify). See WP:Articles for deletion/Aliza Ayaz. Clear conflict-of-interest or other issues here.  Esowteric +  Talk  +  Breadcrumbs   15:45, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Perhaps this needs looking at by uninvolved editors or by a previously-involved administrator?  Esowteric +  Talk  +  Breadcrumbs   16:05, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Esowteric, Im not exactly sure what's going on here. There appears to be some sort of conflict with this article. Do you think this needs admin attention? Im not sure, the article has been cleaned up alot since previous COI issues.-- Kieran207  talk  17:53, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
 * I really don't know what to do, Kieran. I just don't like the way this user jumped on the article and added a bunch of cleanup tags almost as soon as you reviewed it, having previously failed to have it deleted (prior to the latest Afd and draftification). I'm perfectly happy to have uninvolved editors and/or an admin check it out. Thanks again,  Esowteric +  Talk  +  Breadcrumbs   17:58, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
 * I was not the nominator for deletion. That person has since changed their username at the request of other admins for impersonating my username and signature. That said, I am still tagging with good reason issues with the article that still need improvement. There are a ton of references coming from the school she attends that is affecting the neutrality of the article and there is a section on keynotes that reads like a resume of accomplishments.  AngusW🐶🐶F  ( bark  •  sniff ) 18:02, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Abu Sayeed Ayyub
Dear Kieran,

Thank you for your review of my Wikipedia draft entry: “Draft:Abu Sayeed Ayyub”. You have suggested the following: “Needs more sourcing, The Early life and Personal life sections need sourcing from Reliable sources. Everything else seems acceptable, just fix what I mentioned and we should be good.”

There are actually several articles and at least a couple of authoritative books highlighting the academic contributions of Prof. Abu Sayeed Ayyub. A few of these also refer to personal details. However, almost all this material is in the Bengali language.

In response to your review, I have suggested the inclusion of FOUR new references (marked R1-4, below), two of which are in Bengali. Please advise me if my revised entry for the two sections (as shown below) are adequate and acceptable. I will upload the revisions after hearing from you.

Thanks and best wishes,

Early Life[edit] Ayyub was born into a traditional, cultured Muslim family and spent most of his early life in his ancestral home in Central Calcutta. He was the fifth and youngest child of Ameena Khatun and Abul Mukarem Abbad, who served as the personal clerk to the then Viceroy of India, Lord Curzon (George Curzon). [R1]

[R1]: Ayyub, Gauri (2014). Simla-r Smriti (Memories of Simla) in "Amader Dujoner Kotha Ebong Ananya (আমাদের দুজনের কথা এবং অন্যান্য: About the Two of Us". Kolkata: Dey's Publishing. pp. 126–127. In Bengali. ISBN 978-81-295-2168-2.

Personal Life[edit] Ayyub's life was a story of a constant struggle to pursue his creative ambitions against the debilitating effects of several chronic diseases, including tuberculosis in his early life. After finishing his education he moved into an apartment in Park Circus in South Kolkata, where he spent the rest of his life. Here, he lived next to the family of his elder brother, A. M. O. Ghani, a physician as well as a Communist leader and long-time member of the State Legislative Assembly.[R2] In 1956, Ayyub married his erstwhile student, Gauri Datta, who hailed from a Hindu family. Inter-religious alliances were unusual at the time, and Gauri's father (the well known Gandhian philosopher, D. M. Datta) disapproved of the marriage and severed all relations with her.[R3] During the 60s and 70s, their home at 5 Pearl Road became known as a meeting place for many of Kolkata's intellectual and literary cognoscenti.[16] Arguably, Ayyub's best literary output appeared during the last decade and a half of his life, during which period he was stricken by the neurodegenerative Parkinson's disease. Much of his writing during this time was dictated to family members and friends. His continued creativity during these years can be mainly attributed to his wife Gauri's constant supervision and care.[R4] Their only son, Pushan, was born in 1957 and pursued a career as a scientist.

[R2] Ali, S. M., “Abu Sayeed Ayyub: Some Reflections”, The Bangladesh Observer: January 22, 1983, page 10.

[R3] Sen, Arati (2007) in Muhammad Saiful Islam (Editor.) Ayyub: Smarangrantha (আইয়ুব – স্মরণগ্রন্থ: Ayyub: A Memorial Volume), Kolkata: Dey's Publishing. pp.22-23. In Bengali. ISBN 978-81-295-0749-5.

[R4] See the Wikipedia entry Gauri Ayyub

Pushan a (talk) 19:11, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Pushan a, Hello, You need to convert these into inline citations. I see the general references, but inline citations are needed when it comes to biography.- Kieran207   talk  19:34, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Request on 05:39:09, 29 January 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by Pushan a
Hi Kieran

Thank you for your review of my Wikipedia draft entry: “Draft:Abu Sayeed Ayyub”. You have suggested the following: “Needs more sourcing, The Early life and Personal life sections need sourcing from Reliable sources. Everything else seems acceptable, just fix what I mentioned and we should be good.”

There are actually several articles and at least a couple of authoritative books highlighting the academic contributions of Prof. Abu Sayeed Ayyub. A few of these also refer to personal details. However, almost all this material is in the Bengali language.

In response to your review, I have suggested the inclusion of FOUR new responses (marked R1-4, below), two of which are in Bengali. Please advise me if my revised entry for the two sections (as shown below) are adequate and acceptable. I will upload the revisions after hearing from you.

Thanks and best wishes, pushan a

Early Life[edit] Ayyub was born into a traditional, cultured Muslim family and spent most of his early life in his ancestral home jn Central Calcutta. He was the fifth and youngest child of Ameena Khatun and Abul Mukarem Abbad, who served as the personal clerk to the then Viceroy of India, Lord Curzon (George Curzon). [R1]

[R1]: Ayyub, Gauri (2014). Simla-r Smriti (Memories of Simla) in "Amader Dujoner Kotha Ebong Ananya (আমাদের দুজনের কথা এবং অন্যান্য: About the Two of Us". Kolkata: Dey's Publishing. pp. 126–127. In Bengali. ISBN 978-81-295-2168-2.

Personal Life[edit] Ayyub's life was a story of a constant struggle to pursue his creative ambitions against the debilitating effects of several chronic diseases, including tuberculosis in his early life. After finishing his education he moved into an apartment in Park Circus in South Kolkata, where he spent the rest of his life. Here, he lived next to the family of his elder brother, A. M. O. Ghani, a physician as well as a Communist leader and long-time member of the State Legislative Assembly.[R2] In 1956, Ayyub married his erstwhile student, Gauri Datta, who hailed from a Hindu family. Inter-religious alliances were unusual at the time, and Gauri's father (the well known Gandhian philosopher, D. M. Datta) disapproved of the marriage and severed all relations with her.[R3] During the 60s and 70s, their home at 5 Pearl Road became known as a meeting place for many of Kolkata's intellectual and literary cognoscenti.[16] Arguably, Ayyub's best literary output appeared during the last decade and a half of his life, during which period he was stricken by the neurodegenerative Parkinson's disease. Much of his writing during this time was dictated to family members and friends. His continued creativity during these years can be mainly attributed to his wife Gauri's constant supervision and care.[R4] Their only son, Pushan, was born in 1957 and pursued a career as a scientist.

[R2] Ali, S. M., “Abu Sayeed Ayyub: Some Reflections”, The Bangladesh Observer: January 22, 1983, page 10.

[R3] Sen, Arati (2007) in Muhammad Saiful Islam (Editor.) Ayyub: Smarangrantha (আইয়ুব – স্মরণগ্রন্থ: Ayyub: A Memorial Volume), Kolkata: Dey's Publishing. pp.22-23. In Bengali. ISBN 978-81-295-0749-5.

[R4] See the Wikipedia entry Gauri Ayyub Pushan a (talk) 05:39, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Pushan a (talk) 05:39, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Request on 06:05:47, 29 January 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by Pushan a
I am sorry that my query was submitted twice: please ignore the last entry.

What I understand from your last response is that I can now format the four newly suggested references and re-submit the entire submission. Is that correct? Pushan a (talk) 06:05, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Pushan a (talk) 06:05, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Pushan a Yes, you just convert the new references to inline citations and then resubmit.- Kieran207  talk  12:33, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Request on 13:28:12, 29 January 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by Pushan a
. Revised version submitted earlier today. Please check when possible. Pushan a (talk) 13:28, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Pushan a (talk) 13:28, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Pushan a Done- Kieran207  talk  14:30, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 January 2021
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:10, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Connecticut
I see that you help with Connecticut politician pages I was hoping you could help me complete all the Connecticut US Attorneys Bigmike2346 (talk) 16:22, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Bigmike2346 Sounds good. By my count, currently 11 DA's dont have articles. Most of them from 1934-1974.-- Kieran207 ( talk - Contribs ) 01:38, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Curious
Hi there, I was curious about this decline -- Did you manually move around some of the discussion content, or was that done automatically by AFCH. My question isn't accusatory or critical of you--I don't have a lot of experience commenting in AFCs, so if I went about it incorrectly, I'd like to know. If it was just an automated glitch, that would be helpful to know as well. Thanks! Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:38, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
 * U|Cyphoidbomb, I'm pretty sure that's just an AFCH, I usually don't manually change anything on drafts I decline.-- Kieran207 ( talk - Contribs ) 19:48, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Gotcha, thanks for that! Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:39, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

A message from Sjscott80
Hi, how are you? I saw that you declined my submission at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Samuel_Scott_(businessperson). You said that you cannot accept it until the issues are addressed. If you see the talk page, you'll see that I did address the issues that others had raised. Is there anything else you'd suggest that I do? Thanks for any help!

Sjscott80 (talk) 09:57, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Sounds good, I'll review it.-- Kieran207 ( talk - Contribs ) 14:25, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Article on Housing in Russia
Hello, I see that you declined my draft on Housing in Russia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Housing_in_Russia

You mentioned that the article should be more formal and neutral. Could you please be more specific on what parts require a more encyclopedic approach or probably give examples of the unacceptable parts so that I could understand what exactly is wrong?


 * Eh, small things like lack of links. Overly-casual language (E.G. switch "still going on" to "ongoing") Stuff like that.-- Kieran207 ( talk - Contribs ) 18:29, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

A message from Unuphrio Muralto
Hi Kieran207! You were right to ask for more references on my draft article about the LUMI supercomputer at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:LUMI_(supercomputer) - I have since added many more, would you care to take another look? Thanks!

Unuphrio Muralto (talk) 15:12, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Anna Gréki, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page French. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:20, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 February 2021
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:29, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

== How to completely, thoroughly, totally, and permanently delete a Wikipedia account? If not possible, why not? Please avoid wild, vague, invalid, insignificant, inappropriate, and unprofessional answers; instead, provide us with a logically and scientifically convincing, valid, and appropriate answer. Thank you. ==

1.136.107.137 (talk) 08:23, 4 March 2021 (UTC) How to completely, thoroughly, totally, and permanently delete a Wikipedia account? If not possible, why not? Please avoid wild, vague, invalid, insignificant, inappropriate, and unprofessional answers; instead, provide us with a logically and scientifically convincing, valid, and appropriate answer. Thank you.
 * You cant really delete an account yourself. Especially since you're and IP and technically don't have an account. Besides, only administrators can block or ban accounts.-- Kieran207 ( talk - Contribs ) 13:32, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

AfD
I'm notifying you about Articles for deletion/The State of the Union (European University Institute), an article you accepted at AfC.  DGG ( talk ) 06:03, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

Article content removals
Hi, Kieran207, can you please link where this "WP:TRAINS consensus" is? Will want to read. ɱ (talk) 03:33, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
 * ,The consensus is located here. I personally think that the diagrams are fine additions to the articles, but consensus is consensus.-- Kieran207 ( talk - Contribs ) 13:30, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

WP:USSH
I moved Kentucky Route 453 back to that previous title as it was correct per WP:USSH.  Imzadi 1979  →   05:57, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Huh, I guess I was wrong, sorry about that.-- Kieran207 ( talk - Contribs ) 12:31, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 March 2021
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:44, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Issuing level 1 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with John Ford (cricketer). Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—cyberbot I  Talk to my owner :Online 05:10, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
 * I reverted your NAC of the above article because it’s clearly a controversial topic, with four live discussions at deletion review right now on marginally notable cricket player biographies. Rather than send your close there too, I have boldly asserted it to be an oversight on your part and reverted, hope that’s ok.--Pontificalibus 05:50, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Northern Virginia United FC
Please undo your close for this AfD. Per WP:BADNAC, non-admins shouldn't close contentious AfDs. SportingFlyer  T · C  12:24, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Done-- Kieran207 ( talk - Contribs ) 12:38, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Issuing level 2 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))
Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Northern Virginia United FC. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. This is an automated message from a bot about, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—cyberbot I <sub style="margin-left:-13.5ex;color:green;font-family:Comic Sans MS"> Talk to my owner :Online 12:46, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
 * FYI, I have been following this deletion discussion and have left a message on the bot owner's talk page, as you removed the notice following your closure of the AfD, which was later reverted per WP:BADNAC. At the time you removed the notice, the discussion was closed, albeit improperly. You shouldn't have been double warned for the BADNAC and for removing the AfD notice while doing so. Smartyllama (talk) 12:58, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Arif Saeed
Please revert your closure of this discussion. A proper close must not just count !votes but also assess them on their strength relative to policy. The current policy is that subject notability guidelines (such as NCRIC) are not substitutes for meeting GNG. The discussion should therefore either have been closed as no consensus or (more properly, given this has lasted only a week) relisted. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 19:57, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
 * So are you asking me to undo my close then close it again as no consensus/relist? Before I do anything I need to figure out how to do this without pissing off the Cyberbot because I don't want to find out what the level 3 warning is. So just give me a couple hours.-- Kieran207 ( talk - Contribs )
 * A) Undo this, this and this. and B) relist Articles for deletion/Arif Saeed. If you'd rather not do it yourself I can do it. Cheers, RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 20:33, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Done-- Kieran207 ( talk - Contribs ) 20:40, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Fourth consecutive relist of an AfD
Regarding your four relists of Articles for deletion/The State of the Union (European University Institute) and Articles for deletion/Lance Edward Massey, please review WP:RELIST:Please do not relist an AfD four times, especially without explanation and for articles that you accepted at AfC (per an earlier talk page post by ). Thanks! — MarkH21talk 04:54, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Sorry about that, however for the state of the union AfD, It literally had no votes (it did however have a comment) before the 3rd relist.-- Kieran207 ( talk - Contribs ) 17:58, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
 * If there is no opposition to deletion, then you definitely shouldn't relist it at all per WP:NOQUORUM. In any case, you shouldn't be relisting it three or four times per WP:RELIST, especially without giving reasoning in the relist comment. — MarkH21talk 22:58, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
 * You're continuing to relist AfDa where there has been no opposition to deletion, like at Articles for deletion/Torus Tammer. Again, this is against WP:NOQUORUM. Please stop relisting AfDs against established guidelines. — MarkH21talk 02:08, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Welcome to the WPTC!
🌀CycloneFootball71🏈 |sandbox 03:18, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Carloleoneatconference.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Carloleoneatconference.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the file description page and add the text  below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing   with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. <span style="background:-webkit-radial-gradient(red,blue);-webkit-background-clip:text;-webkit-text-fill-color:transparent;">Dylsss(talk contribs) 20:46, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Issuing level 3 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Samanea Yangon, you may be blocked from editing. This is an automated message from a bot about, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—<sup style="color:green;font-family:Courier">cyberbot I <sub style="margin-left:-13.5ex;color:green;font-family:Comic Sans MS"> Talk to my owner :Online 18:35, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

Relisting
Re Articles for deletion/Amora (mustard), please don't relist AfDs when you have already voted. In fact, relisting in general should be left to admins wherever possible, per WP:RELISTBIAS. Thanks. – bradv  🍁  19:03, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

Articles for deletion
Hi there. I'm Barkeep49 an editor and administrator. I noticed at Articles for deletion/Sindhu Joy (2nd nomination) that you relisted it for a 4th time. According to our guideline 3rd relists should be rare and 4th relists should almost never happen. In then taking a further look at your work at AfD I have found some more relists/closes that are of concern. Specifically: This is not a complete review of your work at AfD but there is enough here to suggest that closing and relisting isn't a good fit for your skills at this time. I would ask you to please stop doing those things. If you're interested in AfD, and it seems like you are, I would encourage you to participate in the discussions as many discussions could use more editors. Let me know if you have any questions. Barkeep49 (talk) 19:05, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Articles for deletion/The State of the Union (European University Institute) where it was not only relisted four times but you were the one to have done so each time.
 * Articles for deletion/Lance Edward Massey - which is a third relist. According to the guideline needs a statement about why a third relist is appropriate is required in such circumstances. I do not see any reason that this should be relisted again and have closed it as no consensus.
 * Articles for deletion/Uday Mandal - which you relisted but which was eligible for WP:SOFTDELETION and so was probably not a good candidate for a non-admin relist
 * Articles for deletion/Samanea Yangon - which you closed and which you might have noticed I undid. Non-administrative closes should only be done on uncontroversial closes like WP:SPEEDYKEEP. This was not uncontroversial and so was not a good candidate for a non-administrative closure.
 * I see also wrote a comment on another AfD relist as I was writing my comment identifying a different issue. I hope you will consider what we're saying. Barkeep49 (talk) 19:09, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

Sorry for the late reply, but I have listened to you guys now and I have turned off XfDcloser and have shifted my focus towards nominating and voting.--🌀 Kieran207 - talk 🌀 21:33, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

Cooper station
I'm not sure if the earlier ping worked, but your article and hook is being discussed at Wikipedia talk:Did you know. SL93 (talk) 22:15, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Yeah the ping worked, I just haven't responded yet. I probably will comment on the matter in a little while.--🌀 Kieran207 - talk 🌀 22:23, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Ok. That's fine. I just know that some editors have had issues with pings coming through. SL93 (talk) 22:32, 15 April 2021 (UTC)


 * '''For the record:Wikipedia talk:Did you know/Archive 176.

DYK for Cooper station (Connecticut)
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 April 2021
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:32, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 April 2021
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:30, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 26
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Miculescu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Romanian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:2004 Connecticut State Senate election
Hello, Locomotive207. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2004 Connecticut State Senate election, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:02, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

Pamela Golbin
Hello

I work on wikipedia from 10 years, and i can say : Pamela Golbin is on the french wikipedia :  https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pamela_Golbin She is a prominent figure in the Fashion industry, and Fashion Historian, etc... There is a lot of, reliable, secondary sources. Why decline this page ?Jeanchristopheflorence (talk) 12:58, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Because, there are still large portions of the draft where sourcing is not substantial, or it's just completely unsourced. Which for a BLP is unacceptable. There are also parts of the article that are weirdly written. For example: " Pamela Golbin attended Columbia University in the City of New York" should read "Golbin attended Columbia University in New York City.🌀 Locomotive207 - talk 🌀 (Formerly Kieran207 ) 00:37, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

Your signature
Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated  tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors. As explained at WP:SIGFONT:
 * <font ></font> tags were deprecated in HTML4 and are entirely obsolete in HTML5. This means that the popular browsers may drop support for them at some point. Wikipedia is already preparing for this by delinting code project-wide through Linter. When support finally is dropped, the tags will be ignored in all signatures; any properties such as color and font family will revert to their default values. For this reason, it is recommended that you use tags and CSS properties instead.

I have prepared a replacement signature string for you. You are encouraged to change
 * : 🌀<font face="Comic Sans MS"> Locomotive207 - talk 🌀

to
 * : 🌀 Locomotive207 - talk  🌀

—Anomalocaris (talk) 03:06, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

Ana
Hi, Just to let you know I have restored the redirect for Tropical Storm Ana (2021) to List of storms named Ana, as the name Ana has already been used for a tropical cyclone this year in the South Pacific, which are also referred to as tropical storms at various times. As a result, I feel that the redirect to List of storms named Ana is more accurate than pointing it towards the 2021 Atlantic hurricane season.Jason Rees (talk) 17:52, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Fair enough--🌀 Locomotive207 - talk  🌀  18:00, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

Draft:Maya (2017 film)
I have made changes to the plot after watching the roughly 12-minute film on YouTube with subtitles. Is it worth entering the mainspace now? <b style="color: black;">Kailash29792</b> (talk)  07:53, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

A message from MichaelPackBrewGuy
In my opinion it is important because there are many rivalries in that section that aren't meaningful, but they still have articles created for them. These are two division rivals that have played some good games and if, for example, Patriots-Bills can be an article I don't see how Colts-Titans can not be an article.

MichaelPackBrewGuy (talk) 18:07, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Reconsideration Request for page ClearTax (company) - by User:കാവിന്പുറം
I have carefully reviewed the page ClearTax (company) and I couldn't see any promo material there. ClearTax is a well-known, Notable Startup in the Indian Startup Ecosystem and due to the mistake made by the first editors, the page went to the deletion phase. If you see any promotional material on the page, feel free to edit it. Please consider voting in favour for lifting the deletion notice.

The Signpost: 27 June 2021
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:15, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

GAN Backlog Drive - July 2021
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:31, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Carlo Leone
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Carlo Leone you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mikehawk10 -- Mikehawk10 (talk) 05:22, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

A message from Ianti3
Ianti3 (talk) 09:05, 7 July 2021 (UTC) Hi @locomotive207, you had rejected my "Meters and More Technology" page, saying that " the sources is not reliable" but they are. So I need to ask you how can I make to edit my contents or to review my documents and my sources. Thanks you in advance
 * At the time of my decline, there were many parts of the article that were unsourced, creating a lack of Verifibility. You can fix this by adding citations in places where there aren't any.--🌀 Locomotive207 - talk  🌀  14:06, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for the info @locomotive207. Now the article present different verifiable sources in many parts of it and where there are no is because they are no necessary. Is it not enough?

Articles for Creation July 2021 Backlog Elimination Drive
<div style="border: 2px solid #484898; background: #FFF; background-color:#98FB98; padding: 1ex 1ex 1ex 1.5ex; margin: 0px 0px 1em 1em; font-size: 99%"> Hello :

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a  month long Backlog Drive!

The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running until 31 July 2021.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.

There is currently a backlog of over articles, so start reviewing articles. We're looking forward to your help!

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject Articles for Creation at 21:54, 7 July 2021 (UTC). If you do not wish to recieve future notification, please remove your name from the mailing list.

A message from Babylonian
Hi Locomotive207 - thanks for reviewing Draft:Calyx Institute ... I have a two part question about your comment which was "I'm already a bit skeptical on the notability, but I think that this should stay declined until the potential COI issues are sorted out"

For the 1st part, notability, I am a bit confused because there are a number of in depth references from CNET, CSO Online, and BoingBoing which are solely about the organization which is the subject of the article, not just passing mentions. But I guess I will leave that aside for the moment because I am not understanding how to sort out the COI thing. On my account's talk page, User:Rosguill said something about "likely COI" and suggested that I write on my user's talk page and the draft article's talk page that I am not being paid to write and I do not have a COI, which I subsequently did. Beyond that, I'm not sure why COI is "likely", or what I can do to sort out the matter ? Thanks Babylonian

Babylonian (talk) 15:48, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

Anonymous wikipedia user: CalyxOS does appear to be a reasonably significant operating system which already has its own wikipedia page https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/CalyxOS That OS, which is developed by this nonprofit organization. Also, considering there are 25 article references, and one of the cofounders of the institute (N. Merrill) seems to be a significant figure involved in a famous USA law case, there is no reason for this wikipedia article shouldnt' be accepted. Far worse wikipedia articles are already out there. If there are any conflicts of interest in this article, (replying to user Locomotive207) please state what they are?

Minot Pratt draft rejection. A message from Neatlas
It is odd that the Wikipedia draft for Minot Pratt, a founder of the noted Brook Farm community, author of articles in Boston newspapers, praised by Franklin Sanborn in his recollections of noted Concord persons and by Thoreau in his Journal is rejected while an article on John Pratt, one of Minot's sons, was accepted when that son's only claim to fame is marrying the eldest Alcott sister and being used as the basis for a fictional character by Louisa May Alcott in two of her books. John never published any work and performed no notable public service or action.

Neatlas (talk) 18:05, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

Draft GNG issues
Hi, you rejected Draft:Empower Work due to GNG reasons, I believe that the article meets GNG based on the following analysis:

Quartz: Mentioned founder's name 8 times mentioned organization name 6 times, basically the whole article is about it

Fast Company: Founder's name 2 times, organization name 3 times Whole article is basically about it, provides a criticism section

Tech Crunch: 6 mentions for organization name, 8 mentions for founder name, section written about it (not the whole article) about 1/4-1/3

Chicago Tribune (newly added): 3 mentions for founder's name and another 3 for organization name. Article is basically interviews with NGOs and people who volunteered there, about half of the article covers the organization.

I believe that the article at least has 2-3 reliable sources that provide significant coverage, and maybe 4.

And I know that I’m resubmitted before making much changes, but my first reviewer told me to resubmit after sending them what is basically this message.

 Just ' i ' yaya  03:24, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
 * I'll take another look at it when im back from my break.--🌀 Locomotive207 - talk  🌀  14:08, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

Draft:Jon Baron help/questions
Hi Locomotive207!

Thanks for taking the time to review Draft:Jon Baron. I'd love more information on notability guidelines. Baron -- at least to me -- seems notable outside of his campaign: he's widely considered an industry leader in the evidence based policy area, and the foundation he created and ran (The Coalition for Evidence-Based Policy) is featured on that Wikipedia page, using a citation that shows Baron as president of the Coalition. Additionally, Baron seems to meet the notability requirement for Academics.

As I might be misunderstanding the rules, could you offer and clarity or suggestions on how I might fix this? Thank you again for reading this! AsimDC (talk) 14:31, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Draft:San Francisco CalHeat
Hi there,

Thank you for reviewing our draft.

I am really confused on why this submission has been declined. We are an official sports club, the actual US National Champion of an Olympic Team Sport. We have made all the changes to the initial submission and provided dozens of references from official and verified sources. The history section contains 5 references. There are no more references we can produce unfortunately.

Many handball clubs in the US have way less references than we have, but are approved.

I'd really appreciate if you could revisit your review and/or provide us with concrete information on what you expect us to provide on the article.

Hopefully this can be resolved quickly as we have been through this process for almost a year.

Thanks
 * So what you mean to tell me is that you have an undeclared Conflict of Interest (COI). Please see instructions at WP:COI on how to properly disclose your COI.

I declined your draft because the first two paragraphs of the history section, as well as the teams + most of the accomplishments section are unsourced. This leads to a lack of verifibility (WP:V). Also, I don't think the "Sports Facility Information" section is really that useful or necessary.--🌀 Locomotive207 - talk  🌀  21:54, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

Thank you. How can we address your concerns? I've added everything that I could and am aware of. I don't have reference to the teams besides the official website of the club. The accomplishments are linked to other existing Wikipedia pages. I fee hopeless at this point. The "Sports facility Information" is in fact necessary for people to find where the club is located. I hope you can help us find a way out of this a year after we initiated this process. Thank you

Mahalingam Thangavelu
Hello Locomotive207, Thank you for reviewing our revised submission. I wonder if you could point to the items that you indicate are unsourced. I will make attempts to find the sources. Thanks Mukherjee27 (talk) 01:32, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

Draft:Ajay_Patel_(Canadian_academic)
Symbol opinion vote.svg Comment: seems to fail WP:NACADEMIC. 🌀Locomotive207-talk🌀 22:27, 13 July 2021 (UTC)


 * The person has held a highest-level elected or appointed administrative post at a major academic institution or major academic society.*

Ajay Patel is the highest level appointed administrator at the institution. It is BC's oldest community college, and the largest.

AlbertaTrucker94 (talk) 20:22, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

Draft Review
Hello Locomotive207,

Please review my draft again: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Malcolm_J._Collins

I have rewritten it a bit to the best of my ability and really don't know how to make it read like a non-CV page. If you could guide me on what to rewrite or remove, then I will certainly be able to do it.

Thank you

Horseriderforyou (talk) 04:06, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

Draft:Alfons Siewert
I am puzzled as to the rejection of this article on the grounds that it "is not adequately supported by reliable sources". All the references are to well-recognised sources such as "Whonamedit?" and scientific journals, including "The Lancet", and all were given their precise references indicating the title of the work, date of publication, volume, page numbers etc. I can only imagine that the lack of support indicates that they were not hyperlinked to the source. I have now provided all the references with the original source material's web links and am resubmitting the article for reconsideration.

Ad scribendum (talk) 11:41, 15 July 2021 (UTC) , It's not that the sources you're using are unreliable, It's that parts of your draft are unsourced and therefore not supported by these reliable sources.--🌀 Locomotive207 - talk  🌀  14:10, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

I would be obliged if you would indicate to me which parts are unsourced. It is very likely that one of the cited sources may have covered more than one part of the draft article. It is an important consideration for me that you actually looked at the citations. I have now written several other articles without any problems, but I must confess that I haven't yet mastered the technique of repeating a quoted reference in the same article when required.

Draft:Wolfgang Weber (journalist)
Dear Locomotive207, all sources agree that Wolfgang Weber was one of the most important “fathers” of photojournalism alongside Erich Salomon, Felix H. Man, Alfred Eisenstaedt and some others. His invitation to the most important European art exhibition documenta proves this, and the fact that his estate was bought up by the renowned Folkwang Museum and processed in a large exhibition underscores its importance. You may be right, that the quite inadequate German Wikipedia Article about WW, is very poorly(!) quoted, but what else can I do to improve the citation in the English version? I gave a lot of serious links to find all you want and need about his life and work with one click in the internet. Every single word in the Wikipedia article about Wolfgang Weber is traceable with the sources given - even if you use only the English sources. Sorry, but I am not able to improve it any further.Rundstef (talk) 15:15, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

Draft: Foxes and Fossils
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution is the main, major, daily newspaper of record in Atlanta, Georgia, where they live. ABC News is one of the three largest television networks in the United States. Exactly what are you looking for, if that is not good enough? Typofixer76 (talk) 00:08, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
 * , The entirety of your draft is unsourced except for the external links section. Also, please don't link youtube videos inline.--🌀 Locomotive207 - talk  🌀  22:04, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

Could you please point me to an article (or two or three) you deem acceptable in terms of being sourced? I will be happy to comply with the standard you set, but I don't know what measure to hold to. Typofixer76 (talk) 17:13, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

Draft:Abdul Hakeem Azhari
Hello. You reviewed this draft recently. I have tried to address your concerns. Please review it. Thanks. ScholarM (talk) 19:49, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

Draft:List of DMP Records releases
"Loco"motive207, Your reasons for rejecting my draft are nonsensical. It is impossible to post online references for an out-of-business record label. The data exists only in piecemeal form in online auctions, Amazon and E-Bay listings, and personal collections -- none of which can be linked! And that's what makes a Wikipedia article valuable as a permanent repository for such transitory information. With all due respect, just because you're not knowledgeable about the subject of a proposed article, that doesn't make it "non-notable." Look at the Talk comments on the parent article, if you please. Rcarlberg (talk) 04:08, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 July 2021
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:11, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Sanford station (Danbury and Norwalk Railroad)
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

Request on 07:04:56, 26 July 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by Pun89
I dont aggree with your submission result, i want my submission to be posted in wikipedia asap , it's already 5 months old the event i gave info..i dont agree that my submission needs copyediting and WP-MoS checking ! if you need these two things to post it then tell someone to help me, period. P.S. iam waiting for someone to correct the errors of the submission  in copyediting and wp-mos  and tell me that it is ok to post it in wikipedia, also i spent a lot of time creating this article for free and i expect some support and sympathy from other reviewers to help me finish that article.

Pun89 (talk) 07:04, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

Draft:Antonio Peticov
This draft was rejected due to lack of reliable sources; the sources include official government websites, a recent book published by a well-known publishing house, video of a popular interview program on a major Brazilian network, one of Brazil's oldest newspapers, etc. The sources are in Portuguese, but even running them through Google Translate produces versions that support the statements made in the article. Actionactioncut (talk) 06:20, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

Draft rereview
Hello again :D

This might be a slight bit annoying, but can you rereview my draft? You promised to take another look at it when you finished your break.

--  Just ' i ' yaya  07:49, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

Cape Independence Advocacy Group
About the draft Cape Independence Advocacy Group article. As far as I can tell the article is neutral and in a formal tone. I attempted to make it more formal and to remove possible peacock terms. Please suggest improvements - or point out problems words or sections. Thank you. Joefrog4 (talk) 19:45, 29 July 2021 (UTC) - In terms of 'Reliable sources' - those are well known and respected South African news organisations. Joefrog4 (talk) 02:29, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

Laurence Oliphant, 7th Laird of Gask (July 17)
What is unreliable about the sources I have cited?

Sandy Fortingal

Sandy Fortingal (talk) 11:48, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

Laurence Oliphant, 7th Laird of Gask (July 17)
What is unreliable about the sources I have cited?

Sandy Fortingal

Sandy Fortingal (talk) 11:50, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
 * , Nothing, the issue with the draft is that there is a large unsourced section of your article.--🌀 Locomotive207 - talk  🌀  20:59, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

It's not a long article, so it would be difficult for it to have a 'large unsourced section'. There is nothing in the short paragraph which isn't fully covered by the three sources I have cited, all of which are reliable.

Sandy Fortingal

Draft: Sabina Halder Not Approved
Can you give me more reasons about why is it not approved?
 * Because she doesn't have enough significant coverage in multiple reliable, secondary sources in order to satisfy our guidelines.--🌀 Locomotive207 - talk  🌀  20:54, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

Page edits
Hello Locamotive207, thank you for your page review and suggestions. I have removed most of the external links (except for links to other Wikipedia pages), so hopefully this addressees the issue. I left in most of the citation sources. If there are any additional changes/removals needed please let me know, and thanks again.

Rejection of Sachiyo Ito Wikipedia Draft
Hello, I was wondering if you could clarify as to why the draft for Sachiyo Ito is not approved?

Thank you in advance!

2603:7000:4B40:6493:A598:7989:E055:6056 (talk) 20:40, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Carlo Leone
The article Carlo Leone you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Carlo Leone for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mikehawk10 -- Mikehawk10 (talk) 16:21, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 August 2021
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:43, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

Basir Sultan Kazm (Draft Review)
Hi. Thank you for reviewing my draft of this article. Can you suggest what particular areas of the article could do with rework? This is my first time publishing an article on wikipedia and would really appreciate some guidance on how to improve this article prior to re-submission. Thanks & regards.

AFC decline
Just a quick note, I came across this decline today. "There are external links in the text" is absolutely never the sole reason to decline. It can be part of a decline reason (e.g. "there are also external links that need removing") but going forward please do not decline drafts purely on aesthetic reasons (elinks, formatting, headers, etc). Primefac (talk) 13:07, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

Draft:Purnendu Tiwary
Hello, I’m saw that you give for authors of new articles nice recommendation and comments.Can you see, please my new article Draft:Purnendu Tiwary Thank for your time 🙏 Katerina Spravtseva (talk) 10:17, 16 September 2021 (UTC)Katerina Spravtseva

Draft:Purnendu Tiwary
Katerina Spravtseva (talk) 10:18, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

Draft:Purnendu Tiwary
Hello, I’m saw that you give for authors of new articles nice recommendation and comments.Can you see, please my new article Draft:Purnendu Tiwary Thank for your time 🙏 Katerina Spravtseva (talk) 10:17, 16 September 2021 (UTC)Katerina Spravtseva

The Signpost: 26 September 2021
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:56, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

A message from Dark Angel23490
Dark Angel23490 (talk) 22:50, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

22:46:50, 3 October 2021 review of submission by Dark Angel23490
Dark Angel23490 (talk) 22:46, 3 October 2021 (UTC) Hi, why did my value of Shay Wize was declined? I wanted to connect it with the one in Hebrew. I thought that Wiki rules says that if it's an artist that released an album we can write about. And this artist was in Shazam top 50... Did I put there something wrong? Dark Angel23490 (talk) 22:46, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 October 2021
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:14, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

Draft:Philipp_Hochmair - Submission declined on 14 July 2021 by Locomotive207. Emmy1707
Hi Locomotive207, thanks for reading the first version of "Philipp Hochmair". But you rejected the page, saying that "the sources are not reliable". Now I changed some and put out the IMDb in the References. I hope that it is now enough. Thank you very much for your support.

Emmy1707 (talk) 19:57, 28 November 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 November 2021
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 December 2021
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:07, 28 December 2021 (UTC)

GAN Backlog Drive – January 2022
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject Good articles at 21:18, 31 December 2021 (UTC).