User talk:Lodaï

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (July 15)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Calliopejen1 was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Lodaï/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Lodaï/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Loda%C3%AF/sandbox Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Calliopejen1&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Loda%C3%AF/sandbox reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:08, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (July 16)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bkissin was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Lodaï/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Lodaï/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Loda%C3%AF/sandbox Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Bkissin&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Loda%C3%AF/sandbox reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bkissin (talk) 16:01, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

MI 79 moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, MI 79, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  Onel 5969  TT me 14:12, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:MI 79
Hello, Lodaï. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:MI 79, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:02, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:MI 79


Hello, Lodaï. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "MI 79".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:39, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Template:RER
Hello, Lodaï. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Template:RER, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:04, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Template:RER


Hello, Lodaï. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Template:RER".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 20:49, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

SNCF TGV M
You may "know" the specification but you need to provide a source for it. WP:OR applies. Murgatroyd49 (talk) 09:22, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

-Sources internal to the company. I cannot put a link on the documents. I can only indicate certain facts.

For example, I know that the TGV M will use new Asynchronous motors, much smaller than those of the Euroduplex. For some data, they come from common sense and from video on the web.... example, the length of cars has been standardized for 40 years on TGVs. The Scharf' coupler has been used in France for 60 years on all trains.

(talk) 11:35, 14 May 2023 (UTC)


 * That's WP:Primary sources as well as original research and is not admissible. If youy are that close to the company you should be able to find suitable secondary sources, in the trade or railfan press for instance. In the meantime I will remove the additions until such time as you can source the information properly. Murgatroyd49 (talk) 09:41, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Ok no need to argue with a stubborn, I have no time to waste on this.
 * See ya Lodaï (talk) 20:18, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Tantrums don't help anybody. If you don't like the rules of the game, go play somewhere else. Murgatroyd49 (talk) 20:19, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)