User talk:LogX/Archive 1

Welcome!

 * }

Thank you
Hi thank you for the worm welcoming words, i am happy that i found the gut to start making amendments around, thank you for your patient in advance and appreciate your assistance and comments, regards --Hofman20 —Preceding undated comment added 22:40, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

Thanks
Dear LogX, Thanks for your appreciation and award --Neechalkaran (talk) 08:10, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

inre Articles for deletion/Murugaa
Hello User:LogX. I invite you to revisit the article and then perhaps return to the AFD discussion in the hopes that you might agree that your concerns have been addressed.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 11:48, 21 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Thanks for revisiting. If you think it improved enough to withdraw your nominations, it would speed up a closure if you might strike through your nomination statement, followed by an emboldened withdrawn. IE:
 * There is no reliable sources for this movie . Withdrawn.
 * Best regards,  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 19:17, 21 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Done! Thanks --  L o g    X  19:43, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Super. Happy to have helped.   Schmidt,  Michael Q. 20:13, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

Re
Hello. I am working on these articles and they definitely need to stay. The references and the bibliography will be added by time.georgian JORJADZE 15:29, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks. georgian JORJADZE 16:06, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

Hooray! You created your Teahouse profile!

 * Thank you! --  L o g    X  17:57, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

love to my cobain
I am declining speedy as I see g-hits and youtube page supporting this. Please reply here if there is a reasone I missed to call this vandalism. Dloh  cierekim''' 19:49, 22 August 2013 (UTC)


 * There is no reliable sources and the article is too short --  L o g    X  19:53, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
 * THAT is not vandalism. If the article is too short and has no sourcing, it is better to fix than to delete it.  Dloh   cierekim'''  19:55, 22 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Got that! Will try to improve then!--  L o g    X 19:59, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Dewi Humphreys
Speedy declined as there is plenty of context. 20:20, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

August 2013
Hi LogX. Thank you for your work on patrolling new pages and tagging forspeedy deletion. I'm just letting you know that I declined your deletion request for Jay Soderberg, a page that you tagged for speedy deletion, because the criterion you used or the reason you gave does not cover this kind of page. Please take a moment to look at the suggested tasks for patrollers and review the criteria for speedy deletion. Particularly, the section covering non-criteria. Such pages are best tagged with proposed deletion orproposed deletion for biographies of living persons, or sent to the appropriate deletion discussion. Dloh  cierekim'''  20:29, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Ok. Thank you! --  L o g    X  20:36, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi LogX. Thank you for your work on patrolling new pages and tagging forspeedy deletion. I'm just letting you know that I declined your deletion request for Johnson Park, Piscataway, NJ, a page that you tagged for speedy deletion, because the criterion you used or the reason you gave does not cover this kind of page. Please take a moment to look at the suggested tasks for patrollers and review the criteria for speedy deletion. Particularly, the section covering non-criteria. Such pages are best tagged with proposed deletion orproposed deletion for biographies of living persons, or sent to the appropriate deletion discussion. ''I found a reference that verifies most of the info at a glance. Not seeing the vandalism.  Dloh   cierekim'  20:38, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Franz Nieto
Hello LogX. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Franz Nieto, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Article claims coverage in reliable sources. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 02:52, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

Deleting page outcomes system
Hi I don't know why you deleted the page outcome system which I put up. It is the name for any kind of performance management system -strategic planning, performance management, evaluation, monitoring system - within outcomes theory. It is a technical term which people could look for on wikipedia. Can you tell me what I can do to get it undeleted please and what else you think needs to go on it so that you don't want to delete it any more. Maybe you want it to refer back to the outcomes theory page more, or maybe you want more detail. I can't see the page outcomes system now so I can't look at it to work out what needs to be changed. Any guidance appreciated.

Thanks

Albert

Speedy deletion declined: The Christians (Norway)
Hello LogX, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of The Christians (Norway), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not blatantly vandalism or a hoax. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Shirt58 (talk) 15:51, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your guidance and advice! --  L o g   X  14:34, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Esan (Edo) Language
Would you please explain how this is vandalism. I am very concerned that you are driving away new editors with the inappropriate CSD tags, especially the vandalism tags. Dloh  cierekim'''  23:01, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

Where You Are(Jay Sean Song) speedy deletion declined
A7 does not apply to songs. A9 would, but artist has article. I believe it is time for you to stop tagging articles for CSD and work on article building. I do not believe you have sufficient grasp of WP:CSD to continue reviewing articles with the purpose of tagging for deletion. It would be better to look at the new articles from the standpoint of sourcing, familiarizing yourself with the topic at hand and expansion of articles. I am very concerned at the overall effect your inappropriate taggings are having on new editors. I can tell you from personal experience that tagging a new editor's work for deletion feels like a slap in the face. Unfortunately, your deletion notices are the only notes on their talk pages. I believe it is better to lay a welcome on a new editor's talk page as well as a sincere offer of assistance. To tag for deletion inappropriately makes matters so much worse. Dloh  cierekim'''  23:22, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
 * I apologize for my behavior! Will do better in the future! Sorry about that! Thank you for your assistance! --  L o g    X  13:47, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

New Page Patrol
Hi LogX. Thank you for patrolling  new pages. Of all  the voluntary  work  editors do, NPP  is among  the most  important  because not  only  is it the the first  firewall  against  unwanted pages in  mainspace, but equally  important, it  is the earliest  opportunity  to  provide a welcome to  users who  are not  sure about, or who  are not even aware of our policies at  this stage. I think  it would be a good idea for you  to  stop  patrolling  pages for a while, at  least  until  you have read and fully  understood WP:NPP andWP:DELETION. I know it's a lot  to  read, but  if you  do, you  would be on  the way  to  being  a great  patroller. If ever you  need any  help, don't  hesitate to  ask  me on my  talk  page. Regards, Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 23:44, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

Deletion of 6 in (152 mm)/47 cal guns accepted
LogX, I am the one who created the previously mentioned page. I understand why you would mark the page mentioned page above for deletion. Please, by all means, delete it. I am relatively new to this and I was somewhat confused. Point being, I wish to apologize for my foolish mistake. Take any necessary steps to fix this issue. --Dreadnaught262 (talk) 06:07, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated
Hi, I'm Fylbecatulous. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Love to my cobain, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.  Fylbecatulous  talk  00:58, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

Whisperback
15:43, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Blubberella Lush
I feel that Blubberella Lush is a movie and a bad one at that. That's why I wrote a review on it. I didn't think it was a hoax or vandalism. I would like it re instated. Let me know. I am very new to this page to write. Bye..Norman Bloom . — Preceding unsigned comment added by Norman Bloom(talk • contribs) 21:27, 27 August 2013 (UTC)


 * . The article you wrote about Blubarella Lush was indeed a review. As such  it  is not  suitable as a Wikipedia article becuause it  reflects only  your Original  Research nad Point  of View. Wikipedia articles must  be neutral, descriptive, and well  referenced to Independent Reliable Sources. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 08:03, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

Page moving
Can u pls tell me whether there is any other film named Amarkallam, such that u had to move it? The same applies withVeeram and Kaadhal Mannan. Kailash29792 (talk) 02:34, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
 * No. I thought it should be named for denoting the usage. Because, the Tamil words having different meanings for that. --  L o g    X  14:16, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Kaadhal Mannan was a nickname for actor Gemini Ganesan. In that case, it can be made as either a disambiguation page or redirect to the actor. As for Amarkallam, Veeram, Thalaivaa, there are no other articles under the same title, so they should stay with their original names. Kailash29792 (talk) 15:04, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
 * I got that. Is there anything wrong denoting the usage in the brackets, which is (film) ? --  L o g    X  15:06, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
 * If there is more than one article with the same name, each of the articles' names should be preceded by an extra element. eg: Amitabh Bachchan's hit film Deewaar came in 1975. But it's Wiki article is named as Deewaar (1975 film) because there is also a 2004 film named Deewaar, which is therefore named Deewaar (2004 film). Therefore, the name Thalaivaa (film) is not advisable, because there is only one article on wiki named Thalaivaa. Do not forget this. Kailash29792 (talk) 15:10, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Fine. Thanks for the advice man! --  L o g    X 15:13, 28 August 2013 (UTC)