User talk:LogX/Archive 3

Please comment on Talk:Scott Alexander (politician)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Scott Alexander (politician). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service.'' — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Arkansawyer96
LogX:

Thanks for the warm welcome, I'm still fairly new here. But, I can't seem to keep my mouth shut, which has resulted in two sections on Talk pages (see Concord Talk and Camel Talk) looking like they were half-edited. I'm signing with four tildes like I'm supposed to but it's saving the page funny. A little help, please? Arkansawyer96 (talk) 17:11, 17 September 2013 (UTC)Arkansawyer96
 * I think you are using the VisualEditor, am I right? --   L o g   X   17:14, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

I'm just clicking "Edit source" and going from there. On my screen, my entries show up highlighted in blue and in the same "typewriter" font as when I'm editing. Or it could just be my computer.--Arkansawyer96 (talk) 18:59, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
 * I think the issue has solved now. --   L o g   X   19:12, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Hello, it's me again. I created a section at Talk:Camel "Negative Google search result", the issue I addressed appears to have been solved and now I don't know how to delete the section. Could you either tell me how or do it yourself and notify me? Thanks a bunch.--Arkansawyer96 (talk) 00:20, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Just go the page history which you want to undo your own edits. And click the undobutton. You can find it on the right side of your name there. That's it! Now I have cleaned up your edits on the page as you wished! Thanks! --    L o g   X    13:49, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Thanks again. Whatever a cookie is on here, help yourself to one ;).--Arkansawyer96 (talk) 15:41, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

Sorry!
I was a bit rude over you, last time when we were having a discussion, sorry... By the way, thanks for your strawberries, i really love strawberries

Archana Ramdonee 17:31, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Not a problem! Eat it without tension and anger. Face-tongue.svg Happy editing! --    L o g   X   17:35, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

A cookie for you!

 * Thanks a lot buddy! --    L o g   X   21:15, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Hello!
Olá! Não falo a sua língua, mas espero que a tradução (Google Translate) fique boa.

Could you help me build my user page? I'm from Brazil and would like to create my page on InterWiki. Oh, and thanks for the welcome!Raul Caarvalho (talk) 23:08, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Go to your User page and edit as you wish. --    L o g   X  13:53, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Raul Caarvalho (talk) 00:57, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

VisualEditor newsletter for September 19, 2013
VisualEditor has been updated twice in the last two weeks. As usual, what is now running on the English Wikipedia had a test run atMediawiki during the previous week.

As announced, the toolbar was redesigned to be simpler, shorter, and to have the ability to have drop-down groups with descriptions. What you see now is the initial configuration and is expected to change in response to feedback from the English Wikipedia and other Wikipedias. The controls to add  (underline),  (subscript), and   (superscript),   (strikethrough) and   (computer code/monospace font) annotations to text are available to all users in the drop-down menu. At the moment, all but the most basic tools have been moved into a single drop-down menu, including the tools for inserting media, references, reference lists, and templates. The current location of all of the items in the toolbar is temporary, and your opinions about the best order are needed! Please offer suggestions at VisualEditor/Feedback/Toolbar.

In an eagerly anticipated upgrade to the reference dialog, newly added references or reference groups no longer need the page to be saved before they can be re-used (bugs 51689 and 52000). The 'Use existing reference' button is now disabled on pages which don't yet have any references (bug 51848). The template parameter filter in the transclusion dialog now searches both parameter name and label (bug 51670).

In response to several requests, there are some new keyboard shortcuts. You can now set the block/paragraph formatting from the keyboard: Ctrl sets a block as a regular paragraph; Ctrl up to Ctrl sets it as a Heading 1 ("Page title") to Heading 6 ("Sub-heading 4"); Ctrl sets it as pre-formatted (bug 33512). Ctrl, which creates level 2 section headings, may be the most useful.

Some improvements were made to capitalization for links, so typing in "iPhone" will offer a link to "iPhone" as well as "IPhone" (bug 50452).

Copying and pasting within the same document should work better as of today's update, as should copying from VisualEditor into a third-party application (bug 53364, bug 52271, bug 52460). Work on copying and pasting between VisualEditor instances (for example, between two articles) and retaining formatting when copying from an external source into VisualEditor is progressing.

Major improvements to editing with input method editors (IMEs; mostly used for Indic and East Asian languages) are being deployed today. This is a complex change, so it may produce unexpected errors. On a related point, the names of languages listed in the "languages" (langlinks) panel in the Page settings dialog now display as RTL when appropriate (bug 53503).

Looking ahead: The help/'beta' menu will soon expose the build number next to the "Leave feedback" link, so users can give more specific reports about issues they encounter (bug 53050). This change will make it easier for developers to identify any cacheing issues, once it starts reporting the build number (currently, it says "Version false"). Also, inserting a link, reference or media file will put the cursor after the new content again (bug 53560). Next week’s update will likely improve how dropdowns and other selection menus behave when they do not fit on the screen, with things scrolling so the selected item is always in view.

If you are active at other Wikipedias, the next group of Wikipedias to have VisualEditor offered to all users is being finalized. About two dozen Wikipedias are on the list for Tuesday, September 24 for logged-in users only, and on Monday, September 30 for unregistered editors. You can help with translating the documentation. In several cases, most of the translation is already done, and it only needs to be copied over to the relevant Wikipedia. If you are interested in finding out whether a particular Wikipedia is currently on the list, you can leave a message for me at my talk page.

For other questions or suggestions, or if you encounter problems, please let everyone know by posting problem reports atVisualEditor/Feedback and other ideas at Wikipedia talk:VisualEditor. Thank you! Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 21:46, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Arrambam section
No brother, it has to be removed since separate article exists now, that would be repetition. Also cover cannot be in film article. I just had a discussion. Sorry. Veera Dheera Sooran (talk) 15:11, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Alright bro! Go ahead! --   L o g   X   15:20, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Your request for rollback
Hi LogX. After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback: If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, seeNew admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Beeblebrox(talk) 20:01, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
 * Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
 * Rollback should never be used to edit war.
 * If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
 * Use common sense.

Please comment on Talk:Carlos Latuff
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Carlos Latuff. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name fromFeedback request service.'' — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Vivek Oberoi
Is Mid-day not a credible source for confirming the break up between the two in the Personal life section?
 * The content was not reliable. Please add it with a clear citing sources --   L o g   X   16:58, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

RE: A barnstar for you![
Thanks. i was literally just thinking about it. Wis e men think alike ;)
 * And it seems to the most popular article icreated with nearly 50k hits ysterday. To think when i created it, this would be so big.(Lihaas (talk) 18:49, 24 September 2013 (UTC)).
 * Great work buddy! Keep going --    <font color="#00CED1" style="font-family:Polo" size="3">L o g   <font color="#FF0000" style="font-family:Polo;" size="3.5">X   18:58, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Sources to Shraddha Kapoor
That is not a reliable source to prove her birth date. http://daily.bhaskar.com/article/CEL-shraddha-kapoor-shows-that-she-can-look-glamorous-even-without-makeup-4373947-PHO.html

I disagree the fact that she was born 1987 there is no absolutely sources - no sources to that. She is a young actress below 25 year old not above i can sure that. You 're making a deep mistake by removing her age and insert an fake one. You think your the best, then proved one with a primary reliable one make sure you present it well.

As, you said early to me, Wikipedia can be edit by anyone and no one has the ownership if i get reliable sources, i will put it over there. And you, do not dare threatened me, to block me, i been working on the page for past a couple of months gathering enough information and you just came do not know from where, pretend to be as if i do not who you are....

Archana Ramdonee 15:50, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
 * I didn't add any data as you mentioned above and I don't know who is inserting the exact data. That's why I removed the date of birth on her article. Please add with a reliable source. BTW, keep your words over the other editors, you are using high tempo words. I just warned you for reverting the others' edits and making them threatened. Please assume good faith on the fellow wikipedians. Thanks --   <font color="#00CED1" style="font-family:Polo" size="3">L o g   <font color="#FF0000" style="font-family:Polo;" size="3.5">X   16:05, 26 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Fuff!! You're sounding like a fool, I add 1992 (21 Year old) with sources from leading newspaper indicate her as 21 year old. I had reverted and warned editor who add she was born 1987, without any sources and destroy the current sources. BTW, Shraddha Kapooris an actress; a public figure, she has lovers and haters; The sources are from Newspaper, as an actress she interacts with journalists not Wikipedian Editors. She is 21 year old

Archana Ramdonee 16:55, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Huh! I think you are definitely a fan of her! Please mind your words, else you'll have to face the consequences! There were many sources claiming her dob in different. (i.e 1987, 1989, 1992) Nothing is reliable! I couldn't trust the sources you have mentioned are reliable! State a reliable source! Don't shout at me! --    <font color="#00CED1" style="font-family:Polo" size="3">L o g   <font color="#FF0000" style="font-family:Polo;" size="3.5">X   17:05, 26 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Okay, fine the sources are unreliable; i shall wait and see which sources you came across as reliable.

Archana Ramdonee 17:14, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Fine! Don't trust the third party sites which publishing her birth! It will be better to find a source on the word from her mouth if she intended to reveal so! --   <font color="#00CED1" style="font-family:Polo" size="3">L o g   <font color="#FF0000" style="font-family:Polo;" size="3.5">X   17:19, 26 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Absolutely, i would not believe any sites proved her age; hope you do the same too, your acting as the admin of the page Shraddha Kapoor, i will see which editors sources you found reliable, i will intervene when i do not agree to it. Till then, remember, it is your praise; No one show the ownership of a page, Everyone can contribute to Wikipedia.

Archana Ramdonee 17:44, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Hah! I don't act like anyone as you said! I act in point of view in my opinion! --   <font color="#00CED1" style="font-family:Polo" size="3">L o g   <font color="#FF0000" style="font-family:Polo;" size="3.5">X   17:47, 26 September 2013 (UTC)