User talk:LogX/Archive 4

Sources that Shraddha Kapoor is not born in 1992
Thank you, LogX for your contributions. I just want you to keep in mind if someone in the future fabricates on Wikipedia that Shraddha is born in 1992 I fully encourage you to delete it because it's far from the truth. She is not born in the 90's for these reasons: Watch this video where she said how she existed when Aashiqui released:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mhpFVJu2Xhg. This is enough proof that she is born in the 80's. Aashiqui released in the year 1990 so how can she be alive during that time if she is born in 1992? This is enough proof she is born in the 80's. Secondly, she cannot be born in the year 1992 and also attend Boston University before joining films. She signed to do Teen Paati in 2009. No university would take a person born in the year 1992 (at that time). I'm from the United States so I know this. The youngest she could be is 1988, but anything after that is impossible. Thirdly, Varun Dhawan recently stated how he and Shraddha knew each other since childhood and how they would play together. Here is a link if you would like to see it: http://entertainment.oneindia.in/bollywood/news/2013/varun-dhawan-confirms-relationship-shraddha-kapoor-120226.html. He is born in the year 1987. Fourthly, she did an interview with Marie Claire in 2011 before her Aashiqui 2 fame. It said she was 23 at the time (which means 1988). You can view the link through here:http://www.magxone.com/marie-claire/shraddha-kapoor-marie-claire-india-november-2011/attachment/shraddha-kapoor-marie-claire-5/ Please keep in mind that Smauritius easily believed she was born in 1989 all because "there are more sites that say she is born in 1989" and now she is putting 1992 because she is seeing news articles saying she is 21.


 * Journalist asked: When you had watched Aashiqui (1990),

Shraddha said: I was a child; just born when i watched the film.

If she had born 1992; she saw the film in seventh-eighth standard; that's normal... > Pretty Woman releases in 1990 and i watched it in 2010, so what it indicates that i was born 90's, now you will come and claim that my birth date is not real.

Talking, about she was born 1989, you beg your differ on that earlier, you came and claimed she was not born in 1989, just because the page was created; with birthdate 1987; you hate the actress; you disgrace her as hiding her birthdate if i'm not wrong!.. View the history, you changed her 1989 birthdate to 1987 without sources earlier, Leading newspapers, magazine indicate her as 1992; that is wrong. Wikipedia can be contributed by everyone, everyone came and claimed another birthdate of a public figure; so cannot be accepted, as an actress she been interviewed by Journalists, so if Newspapers & Magazines indicate her as 1992, there is nothing wrong in that.

Not, like you add/claim her DOB, as 1987; and userLOGX believe it... Without regarding any depth informations about Shraddha Kapoor...

Talking, about Boston University only for 1 year, she enrolled in theatres classes, not for a mass degree or anything, only records she had for HS. She studied in Jamnabai Narsee School (Private Institution)- they had their own rules and regulations... in pursuing her study she was a year step forward in her study. She was very young, when started schooling as both her parents are actors and busy working. Had a hectic lifestyles.

She lasts for couple of months in Boston University same year she started, until she signed Yash Raj Films contracts in 17 year old; her father was the spokesperson.

She stated in an interview, She was 17-18 when she was cast for it her debut; movie! ->> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m7vbA0uUdw0

First, provide your basic informations well and appropriate, Claiming she was born in 1989 or 1988 or 1987 without any evidences. 1987 source is IMBD; which you had add at your own; In IMBD, her BOD was 1992 Search in Google; Shraddha Kapoor born in 1992 IMBD you will get the results.

Wikipedia, can edit by anyone, they add 1989 without sources, and this was for a year, the actress had a failure, two of her movies was a flop. Media, did not show any interest to her, let's just say she was not in news. Until, the blockbuster of Aashiqui 2, rose her to prominence, she clarified about her DOB as well.

One advice, '''Go and drink green tea; then you came here, think twice or even thrice, state her DOB appropriately, she was born in 1989 or 1988 or 1987, as you claimed her as 1987 earlier when it was 1989, then it was 1992 now you are claiming she was 1989 - 1988....

Do not complain me or talking about me behind my back, one thing is for sure; you are a retared girl not me. One thing also, UserLogx, is not the admin of page Shraddha Kapoor, everyone can contribute to Wikipedia, i still doing my research and find sources to that, and add the birth date appropriate with sources...

Archana Ramdonee 15:05, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

- I do not hate Shraddha at all and don't you dare get abusive by calling me retarded. How can you draw such a conclusion if I change her birth year? But one thing for sure is that ALL actresses lie about their ages. The whole industry is fake. What does it matter if Shraddha said she was born in 1992? Will you believe that? Why? Because she said so? Shraddha can keep taking years off her age. In that video, she said she was already born when it released, but saw it when she was in the 7th or 8th standard. Every passing year she seems to be doing that, but facts will say something else.

Let me tell you a story...

In the year 2011, newspapers, magazines, gossip sites would say that Nargis Fakhri is 21 (just like how it is now with Shraddha Kapoor). I knew this was false because I have seen her audition from America's Next Top Model from the year 2004 and she said she was 24. I also did research and found her property records which stated she is born in the year 1979. I put her birth year to 1979 and there was a big edit war with her agents trying to take a decade off her real age. Later, she tweeted on her twitter account how Wikipedia has her wrong information and that she isn't born in 1979. She tried to convince her fans that she is born in 1987. I even took screen caps of her tweets. She even made a personal facebook account where fans can add her and she put 1987 as her birth year. Her fans wrote on Wikipedia "I am friend's with her on Facebook and it says she is born in 1987, so 1987 is the correct birth year...not 1979." I contacted a Bollywood site to expose her age and sent them the link of her audition tape and they did so. Ever since then she kept quiet and deleted her facebook account.

Nobody believes Katrina Kaif is born in 1984. I'm a fan of hers, but even I don't believe she is born in that year, but there is no property record or any sort of indicition that she is born before that. So it's difficult to prove to the world that she is older. More than one person has told me that Kangana Ranaut passport says she is born in 1981, but once again it's difficult to prove to the world that because what other credible source is there that says she is born in 1981?

She did go to Boston University, but she dropped out her first year. If she dropped out then that means she was planning to get a degree. It was not a one year or one semester course.

I never once claimed she is born in 1989. I still stand by she is born in 1987. I said the youngest she could possibly be is born in 1988, but definitely not any younger than that. If her YRF contract and school records say that she is born is at that year then why not prove it? Have you seen them? Do you have those records? I do have links that say she is born in 1987, but to you they won't be reliable because you want to believe the newspapers.

It seems like you're going on every website similar to Wikipedia and editing her birth year and trying to pass them off as credible sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Disgrl (talk • contribs) 00:41, 29 September 2013 (UTC)


 * I was abusive towards you, because you had talk about me in another Userpage talkpage, which i didn't feel correct. Being, honest i am just like you one day i came to Wikipedia and started editing without the knowledge, policies required. Sorry, for being abusive, i was not awared of being a cool minded personlity sepecially when contributing in Wikipedia. Trust me, i do not do it again, all credit go Userlogx, for warning me i guess.

Conversation about Shraddha Kapoor age
You stated earlier, that you change Nargis Fakhri DOB, after watching her Youtube Video, claiming she was 24 year old in 2004. I do not know if it is a creditable source??, if you had change her birth age depending of that Video which seem quite correct.

But, why can't you accept the fact, that Shraddha Kapoor, stated she was 17-18 years old, droping out of college when she was cast for her debut movie. That, also seem quite creditable, because she stated on her own.

Do math now, lying about her age; tending to conceal it blah blah blah.... all this craps fall as dubious unsourced content nothing else.

Archana Ramdonee 12:23, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

Good question. I can believe Nargis truthfully stated her age in her audition tape from 2004 because she auditioned for America's Next Top Model. When auditioning for this show, you have to fill up a form and include your birth certificate, etc. You can view the application and requirements online if you like. There is no way she (or any person auditioning for that matter) could have given a false age at the time. Not to mention, there are property records available online which state her age making her born in 1979. To own property, you have to give out your birth certificate and other personal information. There is also the same information for Shraddha Kapoor because she used to live in Boston which states her age as 26. I would've stayed quiet about it Nargis took a year or two off her age, but she tried to subtract 8 years off her age and the other rabid fans tried to take off 10 years. This is complete fraud and I wanted to embarrass her.

Where is the proof that Shraddha is telling her real age in that interview? She wasn't required to fill out a form or give out her birth certificate to the interviewer or to the show. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Disgrl (talk • contribs) 04:48, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please seesuggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service.'' — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Re: Barnstar
Hey! Thanks for that. By the way, when as I create new articles, can I update you so that you can review them and create the talk page? If that will be okay with you. -- Sriram speak up  15:14, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
 * That's my pleasure to help you! Anytime bro! --    L o g   X    15:19, 2 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Thanks mate. As for now,
 * Nenjil Or Aalayam
 * Motor Sundaram Pillai
 * Iravum Pagalum
 * Idhayak Kamalam
 * Chitrangi
 * Kaithi Kannayiram
 * Vaaraayo Vennilaave


 * -- Sriram speak up  15:44, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
 * ✅! You can request Autopatroll rights if you wish to.  See WP:Autopatrol --    L o g   X    16:07, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry. The talk page still shows in red. Does it take some time to update? -- Sriram speak up  16:18, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Sorry, It needed to be updated with stub separation class. I am not familiar with that! --   L o g   X    16:20, 2 October 2013 (UTC)


 * No probs. Hey! By the way, an IP has once again messed up D. Imman. -- Sriram speak up  16:23, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I saw that long ago. It looks fine and has been sourced. If you find any error, please go ahead and clean it up! --  L o g   X    16:27, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
 * No. I mean he has added one of the images that was deleted and there are a couple of dead links too. -- Sriram speak up  16:33, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Can you have a look now? I just cleaned up when you told me. --   L o g   X    16:35, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Hmmm.. saw. You have removed the image. But links 4 and 5 shows as dead links, which means the claim that it supports is actually unsourced. -- Sriram speak up  16:39, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Ah really? I didn't saw that! Because, in my PC some sites were blocked due to official. That's why I thought! Will remove those then. Please remove them if you find yourself as it was wrong! --   L o g   X    16:44, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Gemini
Hey bro! I have opened peer review for the article Gemini (2002 Tamil film). If you have any suggestions for improvements, pls leave your comments there. Thanks. -- Sriram speak up  16:47, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

Nazriya Nazim
Hi LogX whether official fb page is a reliable source or not Perumalism   Chat  17:01, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
 * No. FB won't be a reliable source as everyone can create and edit the data there. Reliable source needed to be publish by a third party. Further see Reliable Source! Thank you --   L o g   X    17:04, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
 * But in case of verified page  Perumalism   Chat  17:08, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Though, it might be better if we get any another sources than that! --   L o g   X    17:12, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Thank Mate for a kind reply Perumalism   Chat  17:14, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
 * That's my pleasure! You are always welcome bro! --    <font color="#00CED1" style="font-family:Polo" size="3">L o g   <font color="#FF0000" style="font-family:Polo;" size="3.5">X    17:16, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

A cookie for you!

 * Thank you so much! --    <font color="#00CED1" style="font-family:Polo" size="3">L o g   <font color="#FF0000" style="font-family:Polo;" size="3.5">X    13:42, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thank you so much for the appreciation! It's really great to be a Wikipedia contributor! --    <font color="#00CED1" style="font-family:Polo" size="3">L o g   <font color="#FF0000" style="font-family:Polo;" size="3.5">X    15:11, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
JamesBWatson (talk) 20:52, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
 * ... and again. JamesBWatson (talk) 21:08, 4 October 2013 (UTC)