User talk:Loganruckmanman

A tag has been placed on Paper luigi, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. You may also want to move the page to EverythingWiki. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -LelandRB (Chat · contribs) 02:16, 23 October 2008 (UTC) == ri Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributionstryurytuyurtyuirtititurtuiitiririr%21&diff=230352249&oldid=230113102 changed] by ytriser:Loganruckmanman|(u) (t) deleting 28996 characters on 2008-08-07T06:15:35+00:00. Thank you. ir:uw-cluebotwarning1 --> ClueBot (talk) 06:15, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

August 2008
 Note: Always remember to substitute user warning templates. For help on user warnings, see the WikiProject on User Warnings. Older warnings may have been removed, but are still visible in the [ page history]. [Admin: block | [ unblock] / Info: contribs | [ page moves] | [ block log] | [ block list]]


 * 1) [[Image:Information.png|25px]] The recent edit you made to Tim and Eric Awesome Show, Great Job! constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks.  --   Darth Mike   ( Talk  • Contribs ) 06:18, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) [[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px]] Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing.  MuZemike (talk) 07:49, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

Paper Luigi
I remind you that you must include verifiable, third-party sources to establish notability of this article about a future game. Otherwise, this article may be proposed for deletion according to Wikipedia guidelines. Thank you, MuZemike (talk) 19:25, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Due to the circumstances, I have tagged the article for speedy deletion as mentioned above. Thank you, MuZemike (talk) 07:49, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

The article Foster's Home for Fuck Buddies has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 05:01, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Makemebad35
A tag has been placed on Makemebad35 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Blowdart | talk 19:27, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

I don't want my makemebad35 page to be deleted because I feel an article about one of the most subscribed of all time on YouTube needs an artivle.

Proposed deletion of Top 10 Greatest Consoles Ever
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Top 10 Greatest Consoles Ever, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process
 * Original research ... No criteria given for ranking. Opinion piece that doesn't appear to be at all useful as an article, and would likely only be good for fanboy edit-warring sourced to various Op-Eds.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Onorem♠Dil 14:13, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Onnetworks
A tag has been placed on Onnetworks, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Rwiggum (Talk /Contrib ) 16:33, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Dad 'n' me
A tag has been placed on Dad 'n' me requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. -Axmann8  ( Talk )  16:25, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Videogamecritic.net
A tag has been placed on Videogamecritic.net requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. KuroiShiroi (talk) 20:28, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Notability
You might want to review a few of our policies concerning the notability of websites: WP:WEB covers criteria for web content, not surprisingly. That might give you an idea of what's needed for an article to remain. Also, please see our requirements for verifiability, reliable sources and references.  Acroterion  (talk)  20:56, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

March 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Name generator, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Name generator was changed by Loganruckmanman (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2009-03-28T02:04:41+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 02:04, 28 March 2009 (UTC) Sorry, that was my cousin. I was eating.

Speedy deletion of Spontaneous human head combustion
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Spontaneous human head combustion, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. RadioFan (talk) 02:32, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

September 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Tim and Eric Awesome Show, Great Job! has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. --  Phantom Steve  ( Contact Me, My Contribs ) 14:01, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Favonian (talk) 14:02, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kid Klown in Crazy Chase
A tag has been placed on Kid Klown in Crazy Chase requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Quartermaster (talk) 13:41, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

February 2010
Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. - DVdm (talk) 18:50, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

This is the final warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. - DVdm (talk) 18:54, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

Blocked indefinitely
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Loganruckmanman


A tag has been placed on User:Loganruckmanman, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

it is the meaningless user page of an indefinitely blocked user.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you.  McLerristarr &#124;  Mclay1  14:36, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Loganruckmanman/videogamecritic


A tag has been placed on User:Loganruckmanman/videogamecritic, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

it is a sub-page of an indefinitely blocked user

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you.  McLerristarr &#124;  Mclay1  14:38, 4 May 2011 (UTC)