User talk:Logger9/Archives/2009/October

Hey!
Just came by to say hi! It's been a long time, hasn't it? Abce2 | Aww nuts!  Wribbit!(Sign here)  23:14, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
 * You think Colloidal Crystal is good enough to be a GAN? Abce2 | Aww nuts!  Wribbit!(Sign here)  23:17, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
 * At the risk of sounding like an idiot, what is a GAN ???? -- logger9 (talk) 23:21, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Good Article Nomination. It may take a long time, but eventulaly a reviewer will look over it and point out any concerns. You can fix them during the nomination too. I can nominate it if you want. Just ask. Abce2 | Aww nuts!  Wribbit!(Sign here)  23:26, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Go for it, dude !!! Mucho appreciado :-) -- logger9 (talk) 23:44, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Done. Though the wait could be from a day to several months. Any other articles you'd like me to nominate? Abce2 | Aww nuts!  Wribbit!(Sign here)  23:48, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Absolutely. My next top choices would be Transparent materials, Physics of glass, Glass transition, Sol-gel and Solids. -- logger9 (talk) 23:53, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm getting something to eat. I'm thinking that Solids could be a FA. Featured Article. Give me a sec to eat and I will be back. Abce2 | Aww nuts!  Wribbit!(Sign here)  23:58, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Heck, these could all be FANs. Shall I do the honors? Abce2 | Aww nuts!  Wribbit!(Sign here)  00:08, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Colloidal Crystal got a reviewer. Ironicly, the person above us. Abce2 | Aww nuts!  Wribbit!(Sign here)  00:09, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Just as an I'll nominate the articles. Abce2 | Aww nuts!  Wribbit!(Sign here)  00:23, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Please feel free to do whatever you think is best. I have tried my best to maintain a quality product for Wikipedia. And thanks for the support ! -- logger9 (talk) 00:25, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Could you go to the talk page of each of them (exempt Physics of glass, found some problems in that one) and help me with the nomination page? Thanks. Abce2 |  Aww nuts!  Wribbit!(Sign here)  00:34, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Sure thing. What do I need to do there ?? -- logger9 (talk) 00:37, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Explain why you think it should/could be a FA. Abce2 | Aww nuts!  Wribbit!(Sign here)  00:39, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
 * OK. I have a lecture tonight -- but I will try to get to it by tomorrow sometime. Thanks again for your support :-) -- logger9 (talk) 00:43, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

I'll keep an eye on the nominations. Also, any FAs and GAs that come out of this I'll try to get given to you, as you deserve them. Abce2 | Aww nuts!  Wribbit!(Sign here)  00:45, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I have currently withdrawn the nominations, due to concerns stated by a user. Abce2 |  Aww nuts!  Wribbit!(Sign here)  01:06, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

I understand. Step by step we climb....... -- logger9 (talk) 19:21, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
 * And we also fall down, too. Abce2 | Aww nuts!  Wribbit!(Sign here)  03:41, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Hello again. Abce2 |  This is  not a test  03:26, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Whatup ??? -- logger9 (talk) 03:28, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

Transformation toughening
Hi Logger9. In August you started a new article on transformation toughening. The article still lacks an introduction. I made a comment to this effect at Talk:Transformation toughening, hoping that someone with expertise in this subject might see my comment and add a suitable introduction. So far, no-one has done so. Would you be able to add a suitable paragraph or two of introduction? Many thanks. Dolphin51 (talk) 11:56, 11 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Sorry for the delay. I saw your suitable comment, and have been dragging my proverbial feet. I will take care of it ASAP. -- logger9 (talk) 17:59, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

Silicon dioxide
Your recent edits removed a section and broke referencing in silicon dioxide. I hope you're merely moving that section within the article. In any case, please (i) provide clear edit summary for your edits, especially major ones, (ii) use sandbox for rewriting to not handicap a main-frame article (which someone might be reading right now). Materialscientist (talk) 06:53, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
 * My Internet connection was broken for two hours by a power outtage. Gimme a break. I'm back on it. Keeping you busy ?? -- 08:25, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
 * We've got one too recently .. No, I suspected you're in the middle of something, just the article looked like a patient during the surgery, for too long, thus reverted. Materialscientist (talk) 09:06, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
 * K-O. Midnight oil time here. -- logger9 (talk) 09:08, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

Transparent materials page move
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give a different title by copying its content and pasting it into. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other articles that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 10:25, 23 October 2009 (UTC)


 * I did not do this recent thing -- but I am not surprised that it was done by another interested editor. I had heard it suggested by several other parties previously. Thanks for the help ! -- logger9 (talk) 16:53, 23 October 2009 (UTC)