User talk:Logical2u

Archive 1 (Start of my span on Wiki to 2nd Wikibreak, November 14h 2006) Archive 2 (From the last archive to ???? wikibreak)

You're welcome
Thanks for your appreciation. The "ongoing" template you seek does not exist. I suspect that it once existed, and was deleted, I believe as redundant to the current template. There's really not much point in pointing out that something is in the news. Every day thousands of articles are in the news, and the best way to indicate that something is recent, is to say so in the text (with a date, not the words "recently") and to reference the recent source in a footnote. The various temporal templates are an example of needless proliferation, in my and a few other people's views. Though I don't agree entirely with this dated essay, I have many sympathies with it: Why tags are evil -- Yellowdesk (talk) 02:35, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:FultzHouse.PNG
Thanks for uploading Image:FultzHouse.PNG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:54, 28 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 14:54, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
 * That's great, thanks. J Milburn (talk) 16:25, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Image:Graffiti_stylaz.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Graffiti_stylaz.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. -Nard 21:09, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:NewtonWake.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:NewtonWake.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:23, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Le Patron


A tag has been placed on Le Patron, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. &mdash;  Rhododendrites talk  |  19:59, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)