User talk:Logical 1

In psychological Astrology most practitioners with counseling practices employ the psychological need theories that were delineated by Noel Tyl in the 70's. Astrological archetypes are paired with psychological needs based on the planet or sign's reference to Archetypal life experiences developed over millenia in traditional astrologyLogical 1 (talk) 00:33, 1 August 2011 (UTC).

October 2012
Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. You copy and pasted content into wikipedia, see WP:COPYPASTE. IRWolfie- (talk) 17:30, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Interesting reaction on your part. Let's see: I made a wee little edit (following yours), to ensure we accuratey reported the source:


 * ''Among professional astrologers The Mountain Astrologer (TMA) is reported to be widely acknowledged as the world's premiere astrology magazine.( ref)
 * And here is what our source says:
 * Among professional astrologers The Mountain Astrologer (TMA) is widely acknowledged as the world's premiere astrology magazine.
 * And here is what you want it to say:
 * ...astrologers believe it to be the world's premier astrology magazine.
 * Leave it as you have it then. I consider it more reliable to report the remark as an attributed comment rather than leave the implication that this is the belief of all astrologers, but it's hardly worth quibbling over.


 * One thing though, since I notice you have put yourself forward for a critical review of your editing behaviour. It makes more sense to assume good faith and put a talk page explanation that 'copy and paste' (which this is not) is prohibited on WP, before leaving warnings of blocks on personal user pages. It doesn't make sense to go so heavy-handed first and then explain on the article talk page afterwards. Logical 1 (talk) 20:07, 18 October 2012 (UTC)


 * It's a standard message, (and I think the only one I could find on Copy pasting). IRWolfie- (talk) 21:28, 18 October 2012 (UTC)


 * If you have a policy reason why you object to my edit you should explain it or point me in the direction of guidelines that support your objection, because nothing here justifies a warning about persistent copyright infringement leaving me in danger of being blocked as an editor. I won't remove this because I think it says more about problems with your editing behaviour than mine, but if you agree that it was uncalled for you can remove this discussion yourself. I don't agree with the edits you have made in your new attempts to paraphrase the source, and believe you are making the reported text unreliable, but your aggressive editing style is unpleasant to work with for editors who don't want to engage in edit wars over petty points. If your intention was to disencourage me, well done. You have Logical 1 (talk) 22:07, 18 October 2012 (UTC)


 * The original message links to all the necessary policies and includes all relevant instructions. I didn't make it, it's just a standard template to give information and to stop people copying and pasting into wikipedia (I think also linked to COPYPASTE as well). IRWolfie- (talk) 23:43, 18 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment on content not editors. Stop misrepresenting me, and stop with the attacks against me. IRWolfie- (talk) 19:03, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

Is this you. IRWolfie- (talk) 19:30, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

Connection
You have only 6 edits to wikipedia but appear to be able to argue at WT:FRINGE. Do you have any previous accounts which you would like to disclose? Or have you edited with another account in the past? IRWolfie- (talk) 01:37, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
 * And more WP edits are needed before someone can be assumed to possess reasoning and common sense...? Here is what I'll disclose: I can follow the blue links, I can read the policy pages; I can comprehend their purpose. Logical 1 (talk) 03:58, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

Requesting your input re the Wikipedia Astrology Project
Hi Logical1 I have joined the Wikipedia Astrology project today and am contacting you as a listed member of that project. There has been a proposal to consider the project dead and merge it with 12 other alternative subjects into a new wiki project which would oversee all aspects of fringe. I think it would be a shame to lose the astrology project on the basis that it has no active participants without contacting the members directly and exploring ideas for new ways to work together on astrology-related pages. It would be very useful if you would visit the discussion and let us know if your interest in the project is still active, or what it might take to rekindle it. Regards Tento2 (talk) 09:33, 13 September 2013 (UTC)