User talk:Logicaltheology

Welcome!
Hello, Logicaltheology, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Favonian (talk) 22:41, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Introduction to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

This page should not be speedy deleted because...
I apologize if I previously came across as if I were heated. One could say I was. Moreover, please note that I am a newcomer, and currently learning how to properly utilize Wikipedia's editing characteristics.

Instead of biting, please assist me by informing me as to what is generally tolerated here, and what isn't; and I will have no problem complying. As I stated, I am a newcomer.

I was merely unawares of the implications of a copy-paste in this "Wikipedia circle". Help me, do not hinder me.

Educate me, do not segregate me. Thank You... Logicaltheology (talk) 23:01, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

"The principle Ignorantia juris non excusat (Latin for: "ignorance of the law does not excuse") is incompatible with the guidelines of "do not bite" and "assume good faith". In this case, ignorance of Wikipedia's guidelines can excuse the mistakes of a newcomer. Furthermore, you yourself violate Wikipedia's guidelines and policies when you attack a new user for ignorance of them." - taken from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Please_do_not_bite_the_newcomers

Blocked
According to your original userpage, this account belongs to an "Antioch Bible Society". We do not permit group accounts of any kind. -- Orange Mike &#x007C;  Talk  04:51, 12 March 2013 (UTC)


 * First of all, there is only one owner of the URL "antiochbiblesociety.org". I have not registered privacy to this URL, so feel free to do a whois lookup. The owner is the same as I said it is. Secondly, the yahoo "group" antiochbiblesociety's messages are not private either. check to verify that there is anyone but myself adding messages to said yahoo group. I am the only person on the yahoo group. Thirdly, the association of the term "logicaltheology" IS tied in with ABS, however this does not indicate that ABS is a group. on the contrary, it validates my claim that the website is MINE. Fourthly, the blog on the ABS website describes the author and only author, me, in detail with a bio, verifying again that it is my website. Fifthly, if you believe you can find a single post from any of the four inactive members of the yahoo group, or evidence from the website that there is anyone other than myself on it, or simply dislike the website for an unstated reason in general, than please simply delete my account. I am not in falsification of any of the facts presented. I have done my best to be honest. I am an amature theologin and philosopher who loves to educate and be educated. No more, no less.

Logicaltheology (talk) 01:16, 14 March 2013 (UTC)


 * note; if you wish to ever decide that I am not a "wikispook", or anything of the sort, I do verify that I will not even make mention ABS on my further edits, if it is hidden somewhere in the rules that cannot. I do not mind this. I am not here to promote anything, except philosophy and theology, and the knowledge thereof. The burdon of proof rests upon the accuser. Logicaltheology (talk) 19:00, 17 March 2013 (UTC)