User talk:Logkailp/sandbox

Comments on your draft: - I like how Sub 1 and Sub 3 explore aspects of the topic which are very factual and can be very well supported; they can be grounded in hard evidence. - There are some claims in your lead/background which are not very hard and factual, and extremely difficult to support. (eg. "the institute has put the issue at the forefront of its collective mind") - Beware of conflict of interest while expanding this draft. Sub 2 seems like it could easily become biased. - Note that an article on the MIT Nuclear Research Reactor already exists. - Perhaps consider a new section on MIT's plans for the future of the environment, and organizing things roughly chronologically. --Iliao2345 (talk) 14:51, 22 October 2019 (UTC)