User talk:Lokeo122/sandbox

Article Evaluation

In the article New Deal, the majority of the information in this article was relevant to the article topic and did not distract from the main point. For example, the article talks about the origins of the New Deal and how the New Deal was implemented. The article even evaluates all the New Deal policies Also, the article talked about the end goal of the New Deal and how that goal was going to be accomplished. Rather that being distracting the article draws the readers attention by talking about every aspect the New Deal had to offer.

New Deal managed to be relatively neutral, most of the points offered the good things the New Deal had to offer. The article did not really talk about the bad policies in the New Deal. For the most part all of the points the author makes have a neutral stance, it is what the point is about that might tip the hat of some readers. The majority of the article the author stuck to the neutral party, but it is what the points are about that could be labeled as bias.

The links on the New Deal do work and the links support the claims of the article. The link "The Living New Deal Project" talked about things like how the New Deal had aided in the development of the U.S. by renovating and building necessary thing in cities and towns. The link "New Deal" talked about how bad the Great Depression and the efforts that the New Deal made to help the U.S. recover from this. The links for this article were factual and they support the claims of the article.

There are definitely certain points that are overrepresented and underrepresented in this article. For example, the point Fair Employment Practices is fairly short compared to most other points. As opposed to the point Recession of 1937 and recovery has seven paragraphs and most of the other points the article talks about are roughly one to three paragraphs. There are some points that go further into detail that other points.

Lokeo122 (talk) 02:47, 2 November 2017 (UTC)Lokeo122