User talk:Lokilovessemites

February 2018
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at National Policy Institute. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Calton | Talk 05:10, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:Calton, you may be blocked from editing. Calton | Talk 05:25, 15 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Edit warriors like you are a dime a dozen on that page, genius, and their rewrites of reality never stick. Given your low impulse control, I foresee a short editing career. --Calton | Talk 05:27, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

March 2018
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article. I am One of Many (talk) 04:21, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Neil N  talk to me 04:22, 14 March 2018 (UTC)