User talk:Lokisandal34

December 2022
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Alejandro Mayorkas. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:52, 23 December 2022 (UTC)


 * I deleted the NYTimes article. But the HIAS aspect stays.The American people should know facts about public officials as it pertains to their jobs. Lokisandal34 (talk) 22:54, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Oh, so you think that you're here to right great wrongs? You're not. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:57, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Alejandro Mayorkas shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:57, 23 December 2022 (UTC)


 * The edits were factual and not against policy. Lokisandal34 (talk) 22:58, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
 * WP:OR is the policy that you violated. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:00, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
 * There was no original research. The HIAS explicitly listed him as a member of their board. Lokisandal34 (talk) 23:01, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Did they talk about conflict of interest? – Muboshgu (talk) 23:02, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
 * That is irrelevant. Nevertheless, I offered to remove that. Lokisandal34 (talk) 23:04, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Edit warring is also against policy. Enjoy your Christmas. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:31, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring, as you did at Alejandro Mayorkas. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:01, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

I published factual content with no original research. Everything was sourced directly from the primary author. The editor vandalized my contribution. I broke no rules. Lokisandal34 (talk) 23:03, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Center for Immigration Studies. Roundish  ⋆  t c) 23:49, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

re the above warning - if they do this again, they need either a full block or a block from the page. I'll do it if I'm around. Doug Weller talk 09:17, 28 December 2022 (UTC)

Important Notice
Doug Weller talk 09:19, 28 December 2022 (UTC)

Important Notice
Doug Weller talk 09:19, 28 December 2022 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month as you may have expected, because of your return to edit-warring following the end of your previous block for the same thing. If you continue in the same way then before long you are likely to be blocked indefinitely. It is clear from things you have written that you are convinced that you are right, and that anyone who does not see things in the same way as you is just being unreasonable; however, in a collaborative project it is necessary to accept the fact that sometimes that happens. That is how Wikipedia works. If we were to simply allow anyone who is convinced they are right to just keep reverting an article to their personally preferred version, the result would be chaotic reverting and counter-reverting until eventually all but one of the people involved had given up. That would simply mean that the most stubborn editor would always eventually get their way, which would not be a good way of resolving disputes. We don't do it that way. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. JBW (talk) 19:54, 28 December 2022 (UTC)

January 2023
 You have been blocked temporarily from editing certain pages (Alejandro Mayorkas) for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:29, 30 January 2023 (UTC)


 * You are pathetic. You are obviously silencing the truth because of fear. Lokisandal34 (talk) 23:30, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Would you like me to extend this block site-wide? – Muboshgu (talk) 23:31, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Based on what justification? Your arbitrary dislike of my contributions? I did not know bots had feelings. Lokisandal34 (talk) 23:35, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

Lokisandal34 (talk) 23:38, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:47, 30 January 2023 (UTC)