User talk:Lolabrchrt

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Velvet Queen (March 19)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Velvet Queen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The Velvet Queen, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:The_Velvet_Queen Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DoubleGrazing&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:The_Velvet_Queen reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:26, 19 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Hello,
 * It's my first time trying to create a new page. I'm trying to work on my references, I guess the format of my references was not what is expected. Thank you for your comment ! Lolabrchrt (talk) 19:39, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi — no, it's not the formatting of your references which is lacking; it's the references themselves. I've just had a look at the resubmitted draft, and unfortunately I have no alternative but to decline it again, as there has been no real improvement to referencing or sources. Best, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:26, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Hello, I don't see how the press kit is not enough ? I added several references, and the press kit is a document written by the directors of the documentary themselves. It is the most important document that is used by everyone to have some references for this documentary. I don't see what else I can find on this subject, and it is even more weird for me to understand since the French wikipedia page has less references than the one I made. 77.128.153.69 (talk) 10:47, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
 * A couple of points in response to your comments:
 * Firstly, "the press kit is a document written by the directors of the documentary themselves" — this is exactly the problem. In what comes to notability, which is the main reason I declined this draft, we need to see what others have said, meaning independent and reliable secondary sources; not what the makers themselves have said. You can use primary sources (even ones close to the subject) to verify statements of certain type, but they do not contribute towards notability.
 * Secondly, whatever referencing the French wiki article may have is immaterial in what comes to publishing an article here on the English-language wiki. Each wiki has their own criteria and guidelines, and only the English one's rules apply here. (If it's any consolation, you're not alone with this problem — the English wiki's standards of referencing are higher than any other's that I'm aware of, so this happens often when recreating articles from other language wikis.)
 * You say "I don't see what else I can find on this subject". Not to put too fine a point on it, if you cannot find adequate sources, that in itself may indicate that the subject is not notable enough to warrant inclusion in the (English-language) Wikipedia.
 * Best, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:12, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

March 2022
Hi Lolabrchrt! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:27, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Velvet Queen (March 26)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Velvet Queen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The Velvet Queen, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:The_Velvet_Queen Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DoubleGrazing&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:The_Velvet_Queen reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:30, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Lolabrchrt. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:The Velvet Queen, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:31, 26 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Hello,
 * I absolutely don't understand why you wrote that, in France Vincent Munier and Sylvain Tesson are very famous. You probably can't read the sources I put because they are in French. I don't know any of these people, and I don't get why you would assume that ? I wrote about a documentary that was very popular in France. I also don't see how this can be consider as advertising, i'm litteraly only using references from other websites, or the press kit, which is basically the "bible" for any movie/documentary. 77.128.153.69 (talk) 10:54, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
 * I am not "assuming" anything. If you read the above notice carefully, it says "if you have an external relationship". If you don't, that's great, and all you then need to do is confirm that in writing. Nobody has accused you of anything, and there is no need to react as if. Thank you. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:21, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:The Velvet Queen
Hello, Lolabrchrt. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Velvet Queen, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:01, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:The Velvet Queen


Hello, Lolabrchrt. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "The Velvet Queen".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 16:25, 22 December 2022 (UTC)